Write clear, accurate formal English
Choose precise words, control sentences and revise paragraph connections so the reader can follow the argument.
Original StudyForA teaching and fictional practice scenarios. Model responses illustrate reasoning; other well-supported answers are possible. These tasks do not award Cambridge marks or grades. A broad topic map is not a complete current-affairs reading programme. Full-length unseen-paper practice, an authenticated reading bank and calibrated human assessment remain outstanding.
Before you begin
- Read short English passages
- Distinguish a claim from its supporting reason
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should a reasoned answer do?
What you will learn
- Use accurate grammar, punctuation and appropriate vocabulary
- Maintain a formal register with clear, coherent expression
Precision is more useful than complexity
Choose words that match the claim and its certainty. ‘May improve access’ makes a different claim from ‘will solve inequality’. Formal writing can use straightforward language; long words and long sentences are not evidence of good communication.
Check agreement, tense, pronoun reference and punctuation. Break an overloaded sentence into linked ideas where helpful. A sentence must make clear who does what and how its reasoning relates to the question.
Edit meaning and organisation together
Revise vague nouns, unsupported absolutes and unclear connections before polishing spelling. Keep vocabulary varied where the meaning requires it, but do not replace a precise term with an inaccurate synonym merely to avoid repetition.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
Which is more appropriate when evidence is limited?
Worked example
Revise: ‘The scheme are obviously gonna fix every problem, it is good.’
Show the worked solution
- Correct subject–verb agreement.
- Replace informal and absolute language.
- Give a specific benefit and limit.
Answer ‘The scheme may improve access if transport and staffing are adequate.’ This version corrects agreement, uses a formal register and states a precise, conditional claim. It does not invent evidence that the scheme solves every problem.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Guided: Correct ‘These policies improves access, they costs too much.’ without deciding whether the claim is true.
Give me a hint
Check agreement and the sentence connection.
Compare my reasoning
- Use improve with plural policies.
- Use cost with they.
- Show the contrast with although or but.
‘These policies improve access, but they cost too much.’ The revision fixes subject–verb agreement and the comma splice. It improves expression without verifying the factual judgement about benefits or cost; those still require evidence.
Look for these in your work
- Corrects agreement
- Connects clauses correctly
- Separates language from factual validation
Independent: Improve ‘Everyone knows online lessons are always better.’
Give me a hint
Replace unsupported universality with a testable claim.
Compare my reasoning
- Remove an invented consensus.
- Specify a criterion.
- Add a condition or evidence requirement.
‘Online lessons may improve access for learners who cannot attend in person, provided connectivity and teaching support are adequate.’ This is formal and testable, identifies a benefit and limits its reach. It avoids claiming universal agreement or superiority across every learner and purpose.
Look for these in your work
- Removes unsupported consensus
- Uses a specific criterion
- Qualifies the claim
Application: Explain why replacing every repeated use of ‘evidence’ with ‘proof’ can weaken an essay.
Give me a hint
Compare the strength of the terms.
Compare my reasoning
- Evidence can support a claim without establishing certainty.
- Proof may imply a stronger conclusion.
- Use vocabulary for accuracy rather than mechanical variety.
Evidence can support a judgement while leaving uncertainty or competing explanations. Calling it proof may overstate what the material establishes. Repetition of a precise term is preferable to an inaccurate synonym; vary wording only when the meaning remains correct.
Look for these in your work
- Distinguishes strength
- Preserves uncertainty
- Prioritises accuracy
Common mistakes
- Using elaborate vocabulary inaccurately
- Confusing confident tone with evidence
- Editing spelling while leaving the reasoning unclear
What can you explain now?
Which is more appropriate when evidence is limited?
Compare with the explanation
A precise qualified claim such as ‘may improve access under these conditions’
Match certainty to evidence and explain the conditions.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Which is more appropriate when evidence is limited?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.