Explain English in the world
Examine the history and global role of English, multilingual settings and the development of diverse English varieties.
Exam scope and assessment notes
These original lessons support study of the official syllabus; they are not Cambridge materials. Practice is self-checked and does not award Cambridge marks or grades. Extended writing and analytical essays need qualified subject-teacher review. Full timed papers and examiner-marked learner responses are not provided here. Interpret language choices in context and qualify claims about audience response.
Before you begin
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
How should an analyst discuss a standard variety?
What you will learn
- Explain historical and contemporary factors in global spread.
- Discuss standard and non-standard Englishes, creolisation and sociolect continua.
- Use examples without ranking speakers or varieties.
Trace spread through history and contact
The syllabus includes colonialism, cultural influence, multilingualism and the future of English. Global roles developed through historical power and institutions as well as continuing communication, education, migration, media and technology.
A global role does not mean one uniform English. Local histories and contact shape varieties, language practices and attitudes. Ask who uses English, for what purpose and alongside which other languages.
Describe variation without ranking speakers
Topics include standard and non-standard Englishes, varieties used by first-language users outside the UK, creolisation, sociolect continua and official or unofficial language attitudes and policies.
A standard variety can have institutional prestige in particular contexts; prestige does not prove linguistic superiority. Creoles have complex contact histories and systematic patterns. Avoid describing multilingual speakers or non-standard features as deficient.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
Why include historical context when analysing global English?
Worked example
A school policy accepts one standard written variety while students use several Englishes and other languages. What issue does this raise?
Show the worked solution
- Separate the institutional purpose of a shared writing convention from the value of other language practices.
- Consider access, identity and possible exclusion.
- Use local evidence before claiming how students are affected.
Answer The policy may provide a shared convention for formal writing, while recognition of other Englishes and languages affects whose identities are treated as legitimate. Whether exclusion occurs depends on implementation and learner experience.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
A text says English is used in a region's courts, schools and online media. Give two questions to deepen analysis.
Give me a hint
Ask how English acquired these roles and how it relates to other languages.
Compare my reasoning
- Ask how historical or political processes established these roles.
- Ask which communities use English and alongside what languages.
- Ask who gains access or faces barriers under current policy.
Useful questions include how history and policy established English in these institutions, how communities combine it with local languages, and whose access or language practices current policies support or restrict.
Look for these in your work
- Includes history or policy
- Recognises multilingualism
- Considers access
A commentary calls a local English variety 'broken'. Reframe the claim for linguistic analysis.
Give me a hint
Describe a feature and distinguish social judgement from linguistic evidence.
Compare my reasoning
- Identify 'broken' as a value judgement.
- Name an observable feature such as vocabulary, pronunciation or grammar.
- Describe its pattern and context without calling it deficient.
'Broken' expresses a negative attitude rather than analysis. A more precise account would describe a specific pronunciation, lexical or grammatical pattern and examine where speakers use it and how audiences evaluate it.
Look for these in your work
- Separates attitude from description
- Names evidence
- Avoids deficit framing
Discuss one benefit and one risk of making English an official language in a multilingual country.
Give me a hint
Consider institutional communication and unequal access or language shift.
Compare my reasoning
- Explain a possible shared administrative or international role.
- Consider access and effects on other languages.
- Qualify the judgement and identify evidence needed.
An official role may support communication across institutions, but it can disadvantage citizens with less access to English or reduce support for other languages. Outcomes depend on education, translation, resources and community choice.
Look for these in your work
- Gives a possible benefit
- Examines an ethical risk
- Qualifies the view
Common mistakes
- Treating English spread as historically neutral
- Calling a prestigious variety inherently better
- Using 'creole' for any mixed or non-standard speech
What can you explain now?
What is the difference between prestige and linguistic superiority?
Compare with the explanation
Prestige is a social judgement attached to a variety in context
Social status does not make a language system inherently better.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
How can you explain a variety's prestige without calling it linguistically superior?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.