Write the A Level argumentative essay
Develop the Paper 3 Section A response on Topics 3–6 with a clear position, evaluated counterargument and accurate Modern Standard Arabic.
Section P3-A · Argumentative writing
Exam scope and assessment notes
StudyForA lessons and questions are original and are not Cambridge materials. Answers to language and literature responses are examples for self-review, not Cambridge marks or grades; ask a qualified Arabic teacher to review extended writing and interpretation. This route is not a full timed specimen paper. The 9865 grammar-and-structures list is a separate, non-exhaustive Cambridge document and has not yet been reconciled item by item. Literature set-text passages are not reproduced; use the correct books and pages for your examination year. Cambridge has not yet published past papers, examiner reports or example candidate responses for this new qualification.
Before you begin
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
Which approach fits Paper 3 Section A?
What you will learn
- Write 350–450 words on one of the four A Level topic areas.
- Support and evaluate viewpoints with reasons and relevant examples.
- Review content, organisation and accuracy without claiming an official mark.
Know the Paper 3 task
Paper 3 lasts 2 hours 30 minutes and is worth 60 marks. Section A offers two argumentative questions from Topics 3, 4, 5 or 6; candidates write one 350–450-word response worth 20 marks.
The response categories are content (10), linguistic range and organisation (5), and language accuracy (5). Section A must be prepared across all four A Level topics.
Develop a line, not a list
State a position, develop reasons, use relevant examples, address an opposing view and evaluate its strength. Your conclusion should follow from the argument and may be conditional.
Choose examples that clarify the reasoning. Distinguish evidence from prediction and avoid claiming that one example represents all countries or communities.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
Which topics may supply a Section A question?
Worked example
Question: «هل ينبغي أن تتحمل شركات التكنولوجيا مسؤولية أكبر عن المعلومات المضللة؟» Outline a strong structure.
Show the worked solution
- Define responsibility in relation to platform design and moderation.
- Explain the case for company action and a possible benefit.
- Consider free expression, feasibility and government or user roles.
- Conclude with a specific, accountable standard.
Answer A focused essay can support greater company responsibility for transparent systems and response processes while requiring clear rules and appeals. It should explain how the policy works and what evidence would show its effects.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Plan: «هل يحق للحكومات تنظيم استخدام وسائل التواصل؟» Include a position, one counterargument and one evaluation criterion.
Give me a hint
Balance protection, expression, transparency and enforcement.
Compare my reasoning
- Define what kind of use or harm is at issue.
- Give a reason for regulation.
- Test the free-expression or enforcement objection against a clear criterion.
A defensible plan could support narrow, transparent rules against specified harms, while recognising risks of overreach. Evaluate clarity, appeals, privacy and consistent enforcement; other positions can work if similarly reasoned.
Look for these in your work
- Defines the issue
- Includes a serious objection
- Uses criteria to evaluate
Write one Arabic sentence that introduces evidence cautiously: 'In one survey, students reported ...'
Give me a hint
Mark the sample and do not turn a survey response into a claim about all learners.
Compare my reasoning
- Name the source or group.
- Use a reporting verb.
- Keep the conclusion within the stated sample.
Example: «أفاد الطلاب المشاركون في أحد الاستطلاعات بأنهم ...» This says what participants reported without generalising to all students.
Look for these in your work
- Signals reported evidence
- Limits the group
- Uses clear formal Arabic
A strong essay has several fluent paragraphs but never answers the exact question. What revision sequence will help?
Give me a hint
Start with task alignment before sentence-level editing.
Compare my reasoning
- Underline the key decision in the question.
- Write your answer in one clear position sentence.
- Check each paragraph's link to that position, then revise transitions.
Rewrite the position so it directly answers the question. For each paragraph, state how its reason supports or challenges that answer; remove or connect material that does neither. Proofread language after the argument is aligned.
Look for these in your work
- Restores task focus
- Connects paragraphs to the position
- Orders revision effectively
Common mistakes
- Arguing only from personal experience
- Treating the counterargument as a token sentence
- Using a broad claim about 'all cultures' or 'every user' without evidence
What can you explain now?
What must an argumentative response do with a counterargument?
Compare with the explanation
Evaluate its strength and explain how it affects the position
A counterargument is part of reasoning, not a box to tick.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Why should you prepare Topics 3, 4, 5 and 6 even though you answer only one Section A question?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.