Paper 2 · Analyse photographs and visual sources
Practise extracting evidence from aerial photographs, cartoons, diagrams, photographs, pictures and satellite images.
Exam scope and assessment notes
Original StudyForA teaching and practice, aligned to the named Cambridge syllabus version. These are not Cambridge questions, specimen resources, mark schemes or grades. Written practice feedback is formative, does not automatically award marks, and does not replace teacher review. Map and image tasks use clearly labelled practice data unless a source is linked; check its date, scale, units and context before drawing conclusions.
Before you begin
- Identify the command word and the resource type.
- Read labels, keys, units, date and source before making a claim.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
Which method supports a reliable resource answer?
What you will learn
- Describe visible evidence, infer cautiously, and connect a visual source to a Pakistan environment or development question.
- Use an original resource-based practice task and explain what the evidence can and cannot show.
Observe before inferring
Describe features that can actually be seen, using relative position, pattern and scale where available. Then make a cautious inference and explain what visible evidence supports it. Do not invent people’s motives, income or risk from an image alone.
Different visual sources
Aerial and satellite images show land cover and spatial patterns; diagrams represent a process; photographs capture a view; cartoons may use symbolism or exaggeration. Identify date, perspective, labels, source and purpose where available. Use another source to test claims about change or cause.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge IGCSE Pakistan Studies 0448 syllabus for examination in 2028–2030
- Cambridge IGCSE Pakistan Studies 0448 syllabus for examination in 2027 (separate version)
- Cambridge IGCSE Pakistan Studies 0448 qualification page
- UNDP Pakistan Climate Resilience Programme
- UNFPA Pakistan · Sihat Mand Khaandaan project
- FAO · Sustainable and regenerative rice production in Pakistan
Pause and explain
What makes a decision answer convincing?
Worked example
Invented practice image description: an aerial image shows dense housing beside a river channel with little open space. Identify two visible features, infer one possible risk and name evidence needed to test the inference.
Show the worked solution
- Identify the resource, question and relevant unit or context.
- Select evidence and explain the connection to the task.
- State a limitation, alternative or further check.
Answer Visible features include dense housing and limited open land beside the channel. This may indicate exposure to flooding, but the image alone does not show water levels, construction quality, drainage or flood history. A map, dated rainfall and river data, or local planning information could test the risk. The scene is invented and is not a photograph.
From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Invented practice image description: an aerial image shows dense housing beside a river channel with little open space. Identify two visible features, infer one possible risk and name evidence needed to test the inference.
Give me a hint
Start with the resource labels, then connect one piece of evidence to the question.
Compare my reasoning
- Identify the resource and command.
- Select a precise observation or value.
- Explain what it supports and one limitation.
Visible features include dense housing and limited open land beside the channel. This may indicate exposure to flooding, but the image alone does not show water levels, construction quality, drainage or flood history. A map, dated rainfall and river data, or local planning information could test the risk. The scene is invented and is not a photograph.
Look for these in your work
- Reads the resource correctly
- Uses specific evidence
- States a limitation
Plan a response using this skill: Invented practice image description: an aerial image shows dense housing beside a river channel with little open space. Identify two visible features, infer one possible risk and name evidence needed to test the inference.
Give me a hint
Choose a clear criterion and support it with evidence.
Compare my reasoning
- State the question and criteria.
- Compare evidence for the options or interpretations.
- Reach a justified conclusion with a caveat.
A strong response states its criteria, selects relevant resource evidence, explains the connection and acknowledges a limitation. Visible features include dense housing and limited open land beside the channel. This may indicate exposure to flooding, but the image alone does not show water levels, construction quality, drainage or flood history. A map, dated rainfall and river data, or local planning information could test the risk. The scene is invented and is not a photograph.
Look for these in your work
- Criteria made clear
- Evidence compared
- Conclusion justified
Original practice claim: ‘A chart proves the policy caused the change.’ Explain what further evidence is needed.
Give me a hint
Check dates, alternative explanations and whether the evidence supports causation.
Compare my reasoning
- Describe the pattern the chart shows.
- Identify another factor that could explain it.
- Name a comparison or source that would strengthen a causal claim.
A chart can show a change or association but does not alone prove that a policy caused it. Check timing, comparison groups, other changes and the source’s methods. Further evidence could include before-and-after data with a suitable comparison and independent information about how the policy was implemented.
Look for these in your work
- Pattern distinguished from cause
- Alternative considered
- Further evidence named
Common mistakes
- Ignoring a scale, unit, date or key
- Describing a pattern as its cause
- Making unsupported claims about people from a visual source
- Treating an invented resource as authentic evidence
What can you explain now?
What should be checked before interpreting a resource?
Compare with the explanation
Its title, source, date, units, scale and context.
Resource interpretation needs evidence and a cautious explanation.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Before using a resource, record its source, date, units and one limitation; then explain how a specific observation answers the question.
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.