Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0972

Compare planetary gravity by mass and distance

Interpret surface field data and explain weakening gravity farther from one planet.

Section 6.1.2 · The Solar System

Solar System pathway · 0972 (9–1) · 6.1.2
Exam scope and assessment notes

Core and Extended · Physics 0972, 2026–2028. Use supplied distances, periods and stated orbital models. Drawings are not to scale. Written practice is self-checked. Human subject-teacher review, supervised practical competence and cumulative assessment remain pending. Cambridge states that IGCSE 0972 has the same subject content as IGCSE 0625, with 9–1 grading. This StudyForA pathway maps the 2026–2028 syllabus only. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. Cambridge has published a separate syllabus for 2029. StudyForA has not reconciled that version yet; this page supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

Before you begin

  • Use weight = mass × field strength.
  • Distinguish radius from altitude.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does gravitational field strength express?

What you will learn

  • Interpret surface field data and explain weakening gravity farther from one planet.
  • Compare mass and distance effects separately and preserve the limits of local uniform g.
Mass is compared at matched radius; distance is compared around one planet. A local uniform surface approximation does not describe all altitudes.Separate mass and distance effectsMatched surface radiusMore planet mass → stronger gSame planet · greater distanceWeaker gravitational fieldGiven local g = 6 N/kg4 kg object: W = 24 NUnequal radii need more information
Mass is compared at matched radius; distance is compared around one planet. A local uniform surface approximation does not describe all altitudes.

State the comparison controls

The strength of a planet’s gravitational field depends on its mass and on distance from its centre. For matched centre distances, a more massive planet has a stronger field. Around one planet the field weakens as centre distance increases. These are different controlled comparisons.

A surface is itself at the planet’s radius from its centre. Comparing two planets’ surface fields therefore changes both mass and radius unless the radii are matched. “More mass always gives greater surface g” is not justified when surface distances also differ.

Keep field strength separate from force on a sample

Gravitational field strength g describes force per unit mass. A supplied local value lets you calculate weight using W = mg. Changing a test object’s mass changes its weight but does not change the stated planetary field value at that location.

Near a small region of a surface, problems may approximate g as uniform. That local approximation does not mean the field has the same strength everywhere around the planet. Moving significantly farther from the centre weakens it; use supplied values rather than assuming a universal surface g.

Pause and explain

For one planet, what happens to gravity farther from its centre?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Two equal-radius planets have different masses. Which has stronger surface g, and why is equal radius relevant?

Show the worked solution
  1. Their surfaces are at matched centre distances.
  2. The more massive planet has stronger gravity at that distance.
  3. Equal radius controls the surface-distance factor.

Answer The more massive planet, because centre distance is matched.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Compare surface g for two equal-radius planets where B is more massive than A.

Give me a hint

Identify the controlled centre distance before comparing mass.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Equal radii give equal surface centre distances.
  2. B has greater mass.
  3. Its surface field is therefore stronger in this matched comparison.

B has stronger surface g.

Look for these in your work

  • State the matched-radius control.
  • Connect the mass difference to field strength.
2 · Independent

A supplied surface model has g = 6 N/kg. Find the weight of a 4 kg object.

Give me a hint

Use the given local field value rather than Earth’s value.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Write W = mg.
  2. Substitute 4 × 6.
  3. Obtain 24 N.

24 N.

Look for these in your work

  • Use the stated planetary g.
  • Distinguish kilograms from newtons.
3 · Transfer

A table gives a more massive planet a weaker surface g than a smaller-mass planet. Is the table necessarily wrong?

Give me a hint

Ask whether their radii and surface centre distances are equal.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Surface distance can differ.
  2. Greater radius can reduce surface field.
  3. Mass alone is insufficient without radius or supplied measured g.

No; unequal radii can make mass-only ranking invalid.

Look for these in your work

  • Identify the missing control.
  • Avoid declaring a contradiction from mass alone.

Common mistakes

  • Surface g depends on radius as well as mass.
  • Test-object mass changes weight, not local g.
  • A local uniform approximation is not a global uniform field.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

For one planet, what happens to gravity farther from its centre?

Compare with the explanation

The field becomes weaker

Increasing centre distance from the same planet reduces its gravitational field strength.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Compare mass and distance effects separately and preserve the limits of local uniform g.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Physics (9-1)

Course scope and assessment

491 sequenced Physics lessons provide 1473 guided, independent and application problems. 58 of 58 syllabus sections have full linked teaching sequences; 0 sections remain pending. Three earlier starter overviews remain available but are not counted as full sequences. The map covers all six subject areas for 2026–2028 and keeps review and assessment limits visible. This is available content, not full programme completion, an exam grade or certified mastery. Written practice is self-checked. Supervised practical experience, cumulative assessment and human subject-teacher review remain pending. Paper method exercises do not demonstrate practical competence or complete either practical-assessment route. This is the separate 9–1 qualification 0972; Cambridge states that its 2026–2028 subject content is otherwise the same as 0625. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. The 2029 syllabus is separately published at https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/764368-2029-syllabus.pdf and is not yet mapped here. This course supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.