Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0979

Plan graphic-product making, printing and finishing

Connect graphic-product measurement, cutting, shaping, joining, printing, finish and technology to quality and safe practice.

Cambridge IGCSE Design & Technology 0979 · 2026–2030 · exams 9–1 · 28-3.3 / 28-3.4 / 28-3.5 / 27-GP / 28-3.3.1 / 28-3.3.2 / 28-3.3.3 / 28-3.3.4 / 28-3.3.5 / 28-3.3.6 / 27-5-REPROGRAPHICS
Exam scope and assessment notes

StudyForA provides original teaching and scenario-based practice, not Cambridge past papers, official marks or an authenticated practical course. It cannot assess a candidate's actual workshop skills, finished product or Component 2 portfolio. Component 2 is school-based, internally assessed and externally moderated; the teacher authenticates candidate work. Any real making requires centre facilities, risk controls and direct qualified supervision. Candidate project work must remain their own. Follow the syllabus for the exam year.

Before you begin

    Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

    Quick readiness check

    Which method can help assemble a graphic package without adhesive?

    What you will learn

    • Select suitable measuring, cutting, forming, joining, printing and finishing methods for graphic products.
    • Analyse product quality, production scale, technology and safe working practice.

    Plan the graphic manufacturing sequence

    Measure and mark sheet stock consistently, using hand or CAD methods. Cutting, shaping and forming methods depend on the material, geometry and quantity; joining may use adhesive, slots, tabs, flaps, fasteners or pre-manufactured parts.

    Printing techniques transfer information or imagery to a substrate. A finish may decorate, protect or rely on the material's self-finished surface. Plan registration, legibility, edge quality and assembly as part of the process, not as last-minute decoration.

    Quality and safety remain part of the design

    Graphic-product analysis includes scale of production, quality assurance, use, maintenance, disassembly and end-of-life. Quality checks can inspect dimensions, print alignment, legibility, colour, joining and finish against stated criteria.

    Safe use of hand tools, power tools, machines or CAM equipment requires local training, risk controls and suitable PPE. StudyForA teaches process selection and checklists; it cannot supervise a workshop or certify practical skill.

    Sources for this lesson

    Pause and explain

    What should a quality check compare?

    Put the idea to work

    Worked example

    A small batch of printed menu holders has inconsistent folds and misaligned text. How should the production process be investigated?

    Show the worked solution
    1. Check file dimensions, print registration and marking out against a sample.
    2. Inspect fold positions, material grain or direction and any forming method.
    3. Use a jig or fixture if appropriate and compare a controlled batch.
    4. Record quality checks and safe procedures.

    Answer First find whether the error starts in the file, print alignment or physical fold. A registration mark and simple jig may improve consistency for a small batch. Compare samples before and after, and check the material and print process with the teacher or supplier.

    Try a topic test

    Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

    Test this topic →

    From guided practice to a new situation

    Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

    1 · Guided

    A printed label is readable on screen but blurry on the product. What should be checked across the production steps?

    Give me a hint

    Follow artwork resolution, print setup, substrate and final viewing distance.

    Compare my reasoning
    1. Check image resolution and text size in the source file.
    2. Check the selected print process and substrate.
    3. Inspect a physical sample at the intended viewing distance.

    Check resolution, font size, export settings, print process, substrate absorbency and final viewing distance. A screen preview cannot prove print quality; inspect and measure a sample, then adjust the file or production method as the evidence indicates.

    Look for these in your work

    • Checks file and process
    • Considers substrate
    • Tests the final physical output
    2 · Independent

    A one-off promotional stand is replaced by a run of 2,000. What quality checks could be added to maintain consistency?

    Give me a hint

    Choose checks for repeatable dimensions, print and joining at key stages.

    Compare my reasoning
    1. Identify critical dimensions and visible graphic features.
    2. Set in-process sample checks for alignment, folds and assembly.
    3. Record failures and corrective action across the batch.

    Use a first-article check, then sample checks for key dimensions, print alignment, fold positions and assembled stability at defined intervals. Record defects and corrective action; adapt the sample plan to risk and supplier capability.

    Look for these in your work

    • Selects measurable checks
    • Includes in-process control
    • Uses records to improve consistency
    3 · Transfer

    An online design file is sent to a remote print supplier. How can version and specification errors be reduced?

    Give me a hint

    Use controlled filenames, a documented proof and a confirmed final specification.

    Compare my reasoning
    1. Identify file version, dimensions, colours and materials.
    2. Send a proof for review and record approval.
    3. Check the production sample against the approved file and specification.

    Use a versioned final file and written requirements for size, material, colour and finish. Approve a proof, then compare the delivered sample with it. Control access and avoid sending personal or confidential data unnecessarily.

    Look for these in your work

    • Controls file versions
    • Confirms production requirements
    • Checks delivered output

    Common mistakes

    • Changing artwork before diagnosing a manufacturing error
    • Ignoring print alignment and fold tolerance
    • Treating a jig as safe without a risk assessment
    Recall without your notes

    What can you explain now?

    What should a quality check compare?

    Compare with the explanation

    The manufactured product with stated design or customer requirements.

    A check needs a criterion such as dimensions, alignment, legibility or fit.

    After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

    Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

    Make it stick

    Recall the main decision in “Plan graphic-product making, printing and finishing”, name the evidence that supports it, and identify one limitation that still needs checking.

    If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

    Keep learning Design & Technology (9-1)

    Course scope and assessment

    29 original lessons map the 2024–2026, 2027 and 2028–2030 syllabus routes; each includes an explained worked example and Guided, Independent and Transfer practice. The 2028 syllabus has revised common content and Materials/Graphic Products options; the earlier route retains Resistant Materials, Systems & Control and Paper 5 Graphic Products. For exams 2028–2030, candidates take Paper 1 (1h, 50 marks, 25%; answer all questions), Component 2 Project (100 marks, 50%), and either Paper 3 Materials or Paper 4 Graphic Products (1h, 50 marks, 25%; answer all questions). Systems & Control is no longer a separate option. Overall AO weightings are AO1 25%, AO2 35%, AO3 20%, AO4 20%. 0979 awards 9 to 1. For exams 2026–2027, candidates take Paper 1 Product Design (1h 15m, 50 marks, 25%; answer one of three questions), Component 2 Project (100 marks, 50%; school-based, internally assessed and externally moderated), and one option: Paper 3 Resistant Materials, Paper 4 Systems & Control or Paper 5 Graphic Products (each 1 hour, 50 marks, 25%). Older overall assessment objectives are AO1 30%, AO2 50%, AO3 20%. Component 2 requires the candidate's own portfolio and practical product, centre marking, authentication and external moderation. StudyForA can teach and coach with fictional scenarios, but cannot grade or authenticate real project work. Workshop tasks require school facilities and qualified supervision. Cambridge's updated 2028 coursework handbook is not yet available; use the 2028–2030 syllabus as the definitive assessment source. Cambridge describes 0979 as the 9–1 graded syllabus otherwise the same as 0445. Cambridge's subject page says June availability is in Administrative Zone 3 and for centres in Oman and the UAE. Confirm the current exam series, zone and centre entry with the exams officer; this route is a separate qualification code.

    StudyForA · Learn with understanding

    Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.