Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Pearson Edexcel · 4MA1

Identify all lines of symmetry in complete figures

Test and draw every mirror line of a complete given figure, including oblique axes, no-axis examples, concavity and true decoration.

Pearson 4MA1 · Shared Geometry · Symmetry · Foundation 4.3A · inherited by Higher
Exam scope and assessment notes

Foundation and Higher share the one published F:4.3A requirement: identify any lines of symmetry and the order of rotational symmetry of a given two-dimensional figure. The Higher table says See Foundation Tier; there are no additional H4.3 rows. Both complete-figure capabilities matter. This chosen three-lesson split requires the lines, rotational-turn and comparison lessons, each with substantive teaching, a worked example and every Guided, Independent and Transfer stage, before the one structural link is retained. Three lessons, twelve original worked/practice cases and twenty original figures are StudyForA’s design, not a syllabus-prescribed count. The official note asks learners to name a quadrilateral with no mirror line and rotational order2; the additional learner completion A(0,0),B(5,0),D(2,3) to find C and the midpoint is chosen original practice within SYM3, not a new source row or a mandatory formal construction. Keep C, the completed outline and its centre/reference result hidden until the learner has attempted the completion. Draw and test all full mirror lines on the entire supplied figure; equal-area division, a diagonal or one successful guess is insufficient. Keep a fixed original and separate rotated tracing, choose/test the centre and record all distinct matches in one turn. Count identity once:0° and360° are the same position. Finite order1 means no nontrivial return before360°, never order0; a full-turn test anchor is not a uniquely determined nontrivial centre. A blank circle has infinitely many mirror axes and matches at every angle about its centre, so it has no finite rotational order or least positive matching angle; never force it into a finite-order integer answer. Preserve true boundary indentations, disks/bolts, category identity and radii; explanatory vertex labels and external legends are not physical decoration unless stated. Rigid page orientation changes preserve counts while moving axes and centres; they are not themselves self-symmetry tests. The scalene seed is (0,0),(5,0),(1,2); the oblique kite is its separately supplied turned fixture. Its numerical reference-grid guidance is reserved for the attempted comparison, rather than required trigonometry. A fixed reference diagram, count choice or acknowledgement does not establish that the learner drew, tested or justified the figure. Written work is not automatically marked. Attempt records and revealed references do not award marks or establish mastery. These are structural links, not exhaustive subskill approval; specialist approval and formal assessment validation remain unestablished. Source assessment notes allow tracing paper and say diagrams need not be to scale; do not measure them unless instructed. Reflection/rotation overlays do not complete5.2 transformations,4.5 instrument/scale/compass constructions,4.11 similarity or the full H4.7 reasoning programme. No blanket formal-proof waiver is imported from unrelated circle-theorem notes. The wider course remains incomplete. Publisher navigation is separate evidence: the only literal F4.3A chapter tag is Book2 Shape and Space6 on map physical10, pages128–160; public uncorrected proof contents start128 and next chapter161 agree. The map supplies no explicit4.3 Hub tag; nearby Hubs58/59,36/37/38 must not be retagged as symmetry. No Book1 chapter has a literal4.3 tag. Limited Book1 printed64 triangle discussion is not a substitute tag: its generic right-triangle zero-lines wording is limited to the drawn scalene case, and its no rotational symmetry wording means finite order1 for non-equilateral examples, with the inclusive equilateral exception preserved. The relevant Book2 mapped chapter body is absent from the public sample; no explicit contents symmetry heading locates every skill. Full final-book and Teaching Hub body/pagination alignment remains unverified; chapter links confer no full-book or modular teaching credit.

Before you begin

  • Read polygon boundaries, equal-side marks and right-angle marks.
  • Distinguish a complete straight line from a ray or boundary segment.
  • Use tracing or folding as an instructed check without treating an unscaled sketch as exact measurement.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

For a non-square 6 cm by 4 cm rectangle, which candidate is a mirror line?

What you will learn

  • Use reflection or folding to test the whole boundary rather than merely equal areas.
  • Draw all distinct symmetry lines, including oblique lines, and justify failed candidates.
  • Distinguish a blank circle’s infinitely many axes from the symmetries of a physically decorated design.

Use three complete outline cards and keep each boundary fixed while testing a reflected tracing. Card R is a 6 cm by 4 cm rectangle, with corners A(−3,−2),B(3,−2),C(3,2),D(−3,2). Card S is a non-square rhombus with diagonals 8 cm and 6 cm, with corners A(−4,0),B(0,−3),C(4,0),D(0,3). Card P is the oblique parallelogram A(0,0),B(6,0),C(8,3),D(2,3). Join each list in boundary order. Draw every mirror axis on each card, naming its location and showing a reflection or fold check. Explain why a diagonal splitting P into equal-area halves does not automatically make a mirror line. Use the coordinates to locate the cards, not to impose a distance-formula method.

Draw and test on paper first. The fixed original stays still while the separate orange tracing moves. All comparison panels share one drawing-unit scale. Include every inward corner and physical disk. A successful numeric trial is evidence about this fixed drawing, not a complete proof or an automatic mark.

Candidate fields always use the original worksheet grid. The entire grid, figure and candidate tracing turn or reflect together in the alternative view. Changing figure, case or view clears your trials and references.

Click a named corner on the active board to use its exact location. Other clicks use the nearest half-unit grid point, with keyboard fields available below. Points never snap to a reference axis or centre. Select a different point role before placing it.

Card R · active drawing

Card ROriginal complete boundary and physical disks. Vertex letters, grid and external keys are explanatory, not physical decoration. Correct symmetry axes, counts and rotation centres remain hidden.ABCD
  • The supplied card is a non-square rectangle.
  • Adjacent side lengths are 6 cm and 4 cm.
  • AB: 6 cm
  • BC: 4 cm

My mirror-line candidate

Accepted tested lines: 0 of 0 distinct candidates recorded. Reversing or moving points along the same line does not add a second axis. These tests do not establish that you found every axis.

My rotation candidate

Positive turns are anticlockwise in the original worksheet grid. Complete reflected displays reverse their screen direction. Keep records grouped by the centre you supplied; do not combine different centres into one order.

The board retains your last submitted valid numeric trial; invalid field entries do not move that tracing.

Compare other given figures at the same scale

Card S

Card SOriginal complete boundary and physical disks. Vertex letters, grid and external keys are explanatory, not physical decoration. Correct symmetry axes, counts and rotation centres remain hidden.ABCD
  • The supplied card is a non-square rhombus.
  • The given diagonal lengths are AC=8 cm and BD=6 cm.
  • AC: 8 cm
  • BD: 6 cm

Card P

Card POriginal complete boundary and physical disks. Vertex letters, grid and external keys are explanatory, not physical decoration. Correct symmetry axes, counts and rotation centres remain hidden.ABCD
  • The supplied outline is an oblique parallelogram.
Original fixed StudyForA symmetry exploration · one shared Foundation4.3A requirement inherited by Higher. Vertex letters, external keys and grid are explanatory. Complete physical categories and radii are retained in every test. Candidate coordinates−20…20 and integer trial turns−360…360 are tool bounds, not mathematical domains; a blank circle still has every turn and no least positive angle. Numeric comparisons use a bounded1e−7 tolerance on these fixed figures, not arbitrary-sketch recognition or formal proof. Up to12 line and24 position records are retained; clear work to start again. Full instrument constructions4.5, transformation5.2, wider H4.7 reasoning, final-book/Teaching Hub alignment, specialist approval and formal assessment remain separate and unestablished.

A mirror line must preserve the whole figure

A line of symmetry is a full mirror line across which reflection maps the entire figure onto itself. Imagine folding the paper along that line, or reflect a separate tracing while keeping the original fixed. Every boundary segment and every true feature must coincide with a matching part. A line that divides the area equally need not pass this test.

Draw the candidate as one complete straight line, extending through and beyond the figure, rather than counting its two rays separately. Name where it passes, such as opposite side midpoints or two vertices. Try the reflection before accepting it: a failed corner, edge, indentation or coloured mark is enough to reject that candidate. A familiar polygon name can suggest candidates, but the complete given figure decides.

Find every axis, including sloping ones

A non-square rectangle has the two lines through midpoints of opposite sides; its diagonals are not mirror lines because the adjacent side lengths differ. A non-square rhombus instead has its two diagonals as axes. A square combines both types and has four. Do not turn the correct axis for one family into a rule for all quadrilaterals.

A kite with two different-length adjacent equal-side pairs has the diagonal through the vertices where the pairs meet as its one mirror line. In an equilateral triangle, each vertex-to-opposite-midpoint line works, giving three. A non-equilateral isosceles triangle has one, and a scalene triangle none. In particular a right triangle can be isosceles or scalene, so the word right does not determine a single mirror-line count.

Keep indentations and physical features

A concave boundary must be reflected in full. For a T-shaped outline, a candidate line must match both the broad top bar and the narrow stem, including the inward corners. Turning the page does not remove an axis; it turns the correct line with the figure. Horizontal and vertical are descriptions of a displayed orientation, not requirements in the definition.

Treat a printed disk, hole or colour as part of the design when the question says it is physical. Vertex labels and a separate explanatory legend normally identify parts without becoming decoration themselves. A blank circular region has every line through its centre as an axis, so there are infinitely many; draw representative diametral lines and state the whole family. One off-centre printed disk usually removes most of those axes because its centre must also be fixed by reflection.

Sources for this lesson

Pause and explain

A circular badge has exactly one small blue disk away from its centre. Which description gives every mirror line of the full design?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Use three complete outline cards and keep each boundary fixed while testing a reflected tracing. Card R is a 6 cm by 4 cm rectangle, with corners A(−3,−2),B(3,−2),C(3,2),D(−3,2). Card S is a non-square rhombus with diagonals 8 cm and 6 cm, with corners A(−4,0),B(0,−3),C(4,0),D(0,3). Card P is the oblique parallelogram A(0,0),B(6,0),C(8,3),D(2,3). Join each list in boundary order. Draw every mirror axis on each card, naming its location and showing a reflection or fold check. Explain why a diagonal splitting P into equal-area halves does not automatically make a mirror line. Use the coordinates to locate the cards, not to impose a distance-formula method.

Show the worked solution
  1. On R, reflect across the horizontal and vertical lines through the rectangle’s centre. Each swaps equal opposite sides and the matching corners, giving its two midlines. A diagonal reflection would interchange unequal 6 cm and 4 cm directions, so the diagonal candidates fail.
  2. On S, reflect across AC and BD. The two equal-side halves on either side of each diagonal coincide, so both diagonals are axes. The lines through opposite side midpoints do not preserve this non-square rhombus.
  3. On P, a reflection across a diagonal or a centre midline leaves some corners or sloping edges unmatched. Its oblique, non-rectangular, non-rhombus outline has no mirror line.
  4. The diagonal of P does split it into equal-area triangles, but reflection does not superimpose those complete halves. Equal area therefore supplies no replacement for the overlap test. The line counts for R,S,P are 2,2,0.

Answer R has 2 axes, the two opposite-side midlines. S has 2 axes, its diagonals AC and BD. P has 0 mirror axes: equal-area halves do not guarantee reflection overlap. These are conclusions about the complete specified cards.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Use four complete marked outline cards: kite A(0,5),B(−3,0),C(0,−2),D(3,0), whose different-length equal-side pairs meet at A,C; an equilateral triangle with all three equal-side marks; the isosceles right triangle A(−2,0),B(2,0),C(0,2); and the scalene right triangle A(0,0),B(6,0),C(0,4). Join the coordinate lists in boundary order and retain the right/equal-side marks. Draw every full mirror line and test it by reflection of the complete outline. Explain why right triangle alone would not tell you the exact line count.

Give me a hint

Keep the kite’s different top/bottom portions, and separate an isosceles right triangle from a scalene right triangle.

Compare my reasoning
  1. In the kite, the equal adjacent pairs meet at A,C. Reflect across AC: B and D swap while A,C stay on the line, so this is one axis. Reflecting across BD would move the unequal top and bottom portions onto the wrong parts, so BD is not an axis.
  2. For the equilateral triangle, draw each of the three vertex-to-opposite-midpoint lines. Each exchanges two equal sides and preserves the complete triangle, so all three work.
  3. For the isosceles right triangle, draw the line from its right-angle vertex C to the midpoint of hypotenuse AB. Reflection exchanges the equal legs, giving one axis. The scalene right triangle has unequal side lengths and no reflection exchanging its full boundary, giving none.
  4. Thus the counts in the stated order are 1,3,1,0. A right angle alone does not say whether the two legs are equal; that missing condition changes the answer. Under the inclusive isosceles definition, an equilateral triangle is the three-axis special case, not a universal one-axis example.

Kite: 1 axis, AC. Equilateral triangle: 3 vertex-to-opposite-midpoint axes. Isosceles right triangle: 1 axis from the right vertex to the hypotenuse midpoint. Scalene right triangle: 0. The right-angle condition alone does not select between the last two results.

Look for these in your work

  • Draw full candidate lines on all four given figures without treating their rays as separate axes.
  • Accept exactly the axes that map the entire marked boundary onto itself.
  • Explain the 1,3,1,0 counts and the missing equality condition in a generic right triangle.
2 · Independent

Use unannotated complete outline cards. The concave T boundary is A(−3,2),B(3,2),C(3,0),D(1,0),E(1,−3),F(−1,−3),G(−1,0),H(−3,0), closed to A. The scalene triangle is A(0,0),B(5,0),C(1,2), closed to A. Draw and test every mirror axis, challenging vertical and diagonal guesses. Explain which indentation or side correspondence rejects a false candidate; do not replace the entire T by only its top bar. Record one rejected candidate with a specific boundary point that fails to land on its reflected partner.

Give me a hint

Reflect the whole boundary, including every inward corner; a triangle reflection would need a matching equal-side pair.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Trace all eight sides of the T, including its inward corners. Reflection across the vertical line through the middle of the bar and stem exchanges left and right boundary parts, so that full line is an axis.
  2. A horizontal reflection would send the upper bar to the lower stem region, and a diagonal reflection would turn the broad bar into an unmatched side feature. These failures show why the complete indentation and stem matter. The T has one axis, not several inherited from a rectangle drawn around its bar. For a specific failed point, the horizontal candidate y=0 sends A(−3,2) to (−3,−2), which is not on the original T boundary.
  3. For the triangle, test a line through each vertex towards the opposite side. A triangle mirror would fix one vertex and exchange the other two, forcing two corresponding side lengths to agree. This given scalene triangle has three unequal sides, so none of those candidates works.
  4. Record one axis for the T and none for the triangle. Leave failed candidates visibly distinguished from accepted axes, rather than presenting a guessed diagonal as a second solution.

T: 1 mirror line, through the middle of its bar and stem (vertical in this orientation). Scalene triangle: 0. The T’s whole indented boundary must match, and a scalene triangle cannot exchange two unequal sides under reflection. For example, reflection in y=0 sends A(−3,2) to (−3,−2), which is not on the T boundary, so that candidate fails.

Look for these in your work

  • Draw and test the T’s one axis while rejecting misleading bar-only and diagonal matches.
  • Justify no axis for the scalene triangle using a side correspondence.
  • Keep every indentation and closing side in the tracing rather than simplifying the outline.
3 · Transfer

Two circular badge designs have the same outer radius of 4 drawing units. One is blank. The other has exactly one small blue disk of radius 0.3 centred 2 units directly above the outer circle’s centre. Keep that blue disk as a true physical part of the second badge, while centre labels are explanatory. Draw representative mirror lines on the blank badge and describe all of them; draw every mirror line on the printed badge. Use a reflected tracing to show why at least one discarded line fails for the complete printed design.

Give me a hint

Test the physical blue disk as well as the outer curve. A line fixing a circular disk must pass through its centre.

Compare my reasoning
  1. On the blank circle, any full line through its centre reflects the whole circular region onto itself. Draw several diametral examples, including an oblique one, and state that every centre-line works: the line count is infinitely many, not the number of examples drawn.
  2. For the printed badge, the outer circle still requires an axis through its centre. The single off-centre blue disk must also map onto itself, so the same line must pass through the blue disk’s centre.
  3. Only one full line passes through both distinct centres. In the supplied orientation it is vertical, and reflecting across it preserves both circular regions.
  4. A horizontal centre-line sends the blue disk to an unprinted position below the centre, so it fails. The printed badge has exactly one axis; ignoring the decoration would give the wrong infinite count.

Blank badge: infinitely many axes, every line through the circle centre. Printed badge: exactly 1, the line through both circle centres. A horizontal reflection fails because the single blue disk would move to an unprinted location.

Look for these in your work

  • Draw representative centre-lines and state the infinite family for the blank badge.
  • Draw the printed badge’s unique common-centre line.
  • Demonstrate a failed reflection using the actual off-centre blue disk.

Common mistakes

  • Accepting a line because it divides the area equally or because it is a diagonal.
  • Counting only vertical or horizontal guesses, or ignoring inward boundary details.
  • Ignoring actual decoration, treating bookkeeping labels as decoration, or giving a finite count for every centre-line of a blank circle.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

A diagonal divides a given oblique non-rectangular, non-rhombus parallelogram into two equal-area triangles. Is that enough to call the diagonal a line of symmetry? Describe the required test.

Compare with the explanation

No. Reflect or fold the complete figure across the diagonal and test full coincidence.

The two triangles can have equal area while their reflected boundaries do not coincide. A mirror line requires every corresponding boundary part to match, not merely two equal areas.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Explain a complete-figure reflection test. Contrast rectangle and rhombus axes, give a no-axis example, and explain what an off-centre physical feature does to a blank circle’s axes.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Mathematics A

Course scope and assessment

Linked teaching: sections 1.1 to 1.11, 2.1 to 2.8, 3.1 to 3.4,4.1–4.11 and5.1–5.2 and6.1–6.3; 2.5, 3.2,3.4 and5.1 are Higher only. This includes Foundation content inherited by Higher and Higher extensions for recurring decimals, surds, fractional powers, algebraic sets, Venn counts, repeated percentage changes, calculations with measurement bounds and standard-form application problems. Algebra includes Foundation symbols, integer index laws, substitution, like terms, brackets and monic factorisation, plus Higher fractional indices, multiple brackets, non-monic factorisation, algebraic fraction operations with domain restrictions, completing the square and proofs. Formulae include derivation from words and diagrams, substitution, single-occurrence subject changes including squares and roots, and Higher repeated-subject and harder power/root rearrangements. Linear equations cover both sides, brackets, fractional coefficients and constructing models from data. Section 2.5 adds all eight direct/inverse x, square, cube and square-root proportion families with actual graph exploration and domain checks. Section 2.6 adds shared elimination and substitution, exact fractions, contextual feasibility and repeated or inconsistent conditions; the additional Higher graphical lesson interprets genuine-line intersections, vertical lines and off-screen crossings. Section 2.7 adds Foundation monic quadratic factorisation, with Higher general factorisation, quadratic-formula and completing-square alternatives, context derivation and line–parabola/line–circle systems including full branches and exact paired solutions. Section 2.8 adds required open/closed number-line intervals, linear and compound solving, construction and identification of Cartesian regions, and Higher quadratic sign intervals and harder linear regions. Its Cartesian boundary-drawing convention note does not remove number-line endpoint requirements. Section 3.1 adds term-to-term and position-to-term generation, integer continuation and linear nth terms, plus Higher arithmetic a,d recovery, the general nth-term formula and finite arithmetic sums. Section 3.2 adds Higher-only mappings, both function notations, actual domain/range reasoning, composition in Pearson order with original restrictions, and affine/rational/restricted-branch inverses. Section 3.3 has nine shared coordinate, straight-line, travel, speed, conversion and quadratic-plotting lessons, followed by two additional Higher line-equation lessons, four Higher graph-family lessons, nine transformation/equation-recovery lessons and three drawn-tangent/intersection lessons. All nine Foundation source rows have lesson links, with paired interpretation and linear/quadratic plotting breadth guards. The broad additional Higher H3.3A row requires integer polynomial/cubic, sparse mixed reciprocal, degree sine/cosine and degree tangent lessons with every practice stage. H3.3B requires all four transformation forms across linear, quadratic, degree sine and degree cosine functions in eight core lessons; H3.3C also requires their algebra recovery and the ninth domain/equivalence/order synthesis lesson. H3.3D requires drawn-tangent construction and signed rise/run using actual units; calculus is not a replacement. H3.3E requires both line/quadratic and genuine line/cubic intersections and their nonlinear-minus-linear difference graphs, with all practice stages. All sixteen Graphs source rows now have teaching and staged-practice links; exhaustive subskill approval, mastery and assessment readiness remain unestablished. Section 3.4 adds six Higher-only lessons for variable rates, integer-power differentiation, gradient/rate conditions, stationary coordinates classified by original graph shape, one-dimensional motion and other practical models. H3.4C requires gradient and stationary slices; H3.4E requires both motion and other-practical slices. Preserve original domains, negative-power exclusions, admissible counts and boundary candidates. All five source rows have structural links, not exhaustive subskill approval or specialist/assessment validation. Section4.1 adds six shared Foundation/inherited-Higher lessons for selected acute/right/obtuse/reflex arcs, point/straight/intersection and parallel-transversal angles, triangle sums/exteriors, isosceles/equilateral and right/mixed triangles. All four shared rows have structural links; B requires both local and parallel strands and D both special and right-triangle strands, each with every practice stage. No additional H4.1 rows are invented. Preserve labelled geometry and reasons, the auxiliary-parallel triangle-sum argument, actual straight extensions, inclusive equilateral/isosceles and right-isosceles categories, and impossible/insufficient-data checks. Section4.5 constructions,4.4 measurement/bearings and the full H4.7 reasoning scope remain separate, without a blanket formal-proof waiver. Section4.2 adds seven shared Foundation/inherited-Higher Polygons lessons for all nine named polygon examples, convex/concave quadrilateral sums, all six named quadrilateral property families, general/regular polygon angles and congruence correspondence. Its seven rows A–G have structural links, with no additional Higher rows; C requires both family lessons and every practice stage. F/G remain two distinct published IDs supported by the same congruence lesson. Rhombus/square and kite endpoint-angle bisection and isosceles-trapezium equal diagonals are conservative standard-property breadth, not invented verbatim source bullets. Preserve reflex interiors, valid internal triangulations, local trapezium/kite conventions, exact integer side counts and impossible-data guards. Section4.3 symmetry,4.5 formal constructions,4.11 similarity and the full H4.7A reasoning programme remain separate. Literal book tags omit A; G has no Hub tag, and the Book2 map/proof congruence location and chapter7 page-range conflict remain unresolved. Section4.3 adds three shared Foundation/inherited-Higher Symmetry lessons for the one F4.3A source row, requiring every lesson and practice stage for the joint line/rotation capabilities. Draw all mirror lines, test a fixed original against a separate tracing about a chosen centre, count identity once and distinguish order1 from a blank circle’s non-finite rotations. Preserve indentations and true physical disk/colour features; the chosen missing-vertex parallelogram completion is original breadth, not an extra row or4.5construction credit. No additional H4.3 row is invented. The sole literal book link is Book2 Shape and Space6; no Book1 tag or explicit4.3Hub tag is invented, and its mapped chapter body/full final-book alignment remains unverified. Section4.5construction,5.2transformations,4.11similarity and full Higher reasoning remain separate. Section4.4 adds eight shared Foundation/inherited-Higher Measures lessons for seven A–G source rows and no additional Higher rows. Use complete instrument-scale, time-interval, sensible-estimate, nearest-degree protractor and three-figure-bearing teaching. F4.4F requires the full speed lesson; broad F4.4G requires speed, density and pressure, each with its worked explanation and every practice stage, with source binding on the same complete record. Preserve calibrated ticks and actual instrument action, compatible units, midnight/day order, approximate readings and north conventions. Keep numerical references hidden until calibrated attempts. Time recovery requires positive speed; at zero speed positive distance is impossible and zero distance alone is underdetermined. Density uses positive volume, displacement differences and explicit additive-volume assumptions; pressure uses the given formula, supplied forces and positive contact areas. Literal book navigation names only D and G; no A/B/C/E/F tags are invented, and Book1 map255–268/proof256–269 remains unresolved. These structural links do not complete4.5 instrument/compass constructions or scale drawings,5.2 transformations or formal assessment. Section4.5 adds six shared Foundation/inherited-Higher Construction lessons for four A–D rows and no additional Higher rows. A requires both nearest-millimetre measurement and actual line drawing. BroadB requires complete triangles and other two-dimensional shapes; broadD requires both straight-edge-and-compasses bisectors. Source binding and complete teaching/worked/all three practice stages must belong to the same required record. Use real ruler, protractor and compass action with retained construction evidence, physical calibration and honest approximate readings. Keep private endpoint readings, pose coordinates, solved vertices/crossings and reference directions hidden before instrument attempts. Respect valid mirror branches and selected minor/reflex angles; reject impossible triangles, insufficient data and degenerate crossings. Scale drawings require construction before measuring the unknown, compatible units and a labelled positive scale; drawing placement offsets remain givens. Literal book navigation names B/C/D only in Book2 Shape and Space6 with Hubs37/36/38. A has no literal chapter/Hub tag and no Book1 tag is invented. Public proof contents agree with map128–160 and show generic Constructions139, but the relevant body, full-book/Hub content and exact subtype pages remain unavailable. These structural links do not grant4.6 circle properties,4.7 whole geometrical reasoning,4.8 trigonometry,4.9 mensuration,4.11 maps/similarity,5.2 transformations or loci credit. The nearby circle formal-proof note is not imported. Section4.6 adds nine original Circle properties lessons for two shared Foundation and three additional Higher rows. The first three shared lessons cover all nine named parts, both chord/centre implications and both tangent facts. F4.6B requires both chord and tangent lessons. Additional Higher H4.6A requires both internal-chord and external-secant products with original named lengths, positive lengths and correct internal/near-far point order. H4.6B requires actual concyclic boundary vertices. H4.6C requires all five theorem parts across centre/circumference, diameter/same-segment, cyclic-opposite-angle and alternate-segment lessons. Every required slice needs substantive teaching, explained worked work and all three practice stages on one source-bound record; no half-row or untagged duplicate closes the bundle. Keep given marks separate from derived marks and retain selected major/minor arcs, tangent rays and physical algebraic-root domains. The no-formal-proof note belongs to H4.6C, not a blanket H4.6A/H4.7 exemption. Literal Book2 chapter5 tags F4.6B/H4.6B/H4.6C and chapter8 tags H4.6A/H4.6C are navigation only; no F4.6A or Book1 tag is invented. Chapter8 map326–349 versus proof chapter-start325 and next chapter349 remains unresolved; relevant final bodies and Hub content are unverified. These structural links do not complete construction, whole geometrical reasoning, trigonometry or mensuration, or establish specialist approval, mastery or formal assessment. Section4.7 adds five original Geometrical reasoning lessons for one shared F4.7A and one additional H4.7A row. The shared row jointly requires line/triangle, polygon and chord/tangent numerical reasoning, including lengths; the Higher row jointly requires both circle and mixed-angle standard-statement chains. Every required record needs substantive teaching, its explained worked example and all three fresh practice stages, with the source ID on that same complete record. Preserve actual diagram hypotheses, common arcs, contact radii, selected tangent rays, cyclic/straight point order, valid internal triangulations and the unknown regular-polygon outline after deduction. Each geometric equation needs a named reason; a correct number or sufficient text length does not validate an arbitrary written argument. The H4.6C formal-theorem-proof note remains local, not a blanket4.7 waiver. Only literal H4.7A Book1 Shape and Space1/Hub89,137,138,139 navigation is used; no Foundation4.7A or Book2 tag is invented. Public Book1 chapter60–99 is available but does not establish full Higher circle-angle or Hub body scope. These links do not award4.5construction skill, specialist approval, mastery or formal assessment. Section4.8 adds eleven original Trigonometry and Pythagoras’ theorem lessons for three shared F4.8A–C and six additional H4.8A–F rows. The first four are shared; the last seven are additional Higher. F4.8B jointly requires lengths with all acute ratios and inverse-angle work; H4.8C jointly requires sine-rule and cosine-rule teaching. Every row needs all its named source-bound records, substantive teaching, explained worked work and every Guided/Independent/Transfer stage. Preserve both missing-leg and missing-hypotenuse Pythagoras, signed bearing components with local north, all three obtuse functions, actual elevation/depression horizontals, admissible SSA branches and included-angle area restrictions. Three-dimensional work requires perpendicular sections and the actual foot/projection for a line-plane angle; plane-plane angles are excluded. Positive physical lengths, inverse domains, triangle inequalities, degree mode, exact forms and final-only rounding remain explicit. Chosen SSA two/one/no and inverse-area comparisons are safeguards, not extra syllabus rows. Literal navigation uses Book1 SS1–4 only: no Book2 tag or dedicated H4.8A Hub is invented. Hub145 is tagged F4.8A in SS1 and H4.8D in SS3; the former title does not extend Foundation into3D. Public Pythagoras body74–76 is available, but SS2/3/4 bodies and Hub content are unverified. SS2 map176–197 versus summary198, and SS3 map243–254 versus proof-start244/summary255 remain unresolved. No4.5construction,4.9mensuration, full-book, specialist, mastery or formal-assessment credit follows from these structural links. Section4.9 adds eight original Mensuration lessons for five shared F4.9A–E and one additional H4.9A row. The first six are shared; the last two are Higher. F4.9E jointly requires complete circle and semicircle/compound-boundary lessons; H4.9A jointly requires degree arcs/perimeters and sector-area/recovery lessons. Every required source-bound record needs substantive teaching, its explained worked example, checks and all Guided/Independent/Transfer stages. Retain both-direction linear/area conversions, exposed polygon boundary traces and internal joins, triangle/rectangle decomposition and contained disjoint cutouts, outside perpendicular heights, both parallelogram/trapezium methods, radius/diameter recovery and semicircle arc-versus-perimeter distinctions. Preserve major/remaining sector sweeps, positive physical roots, inverse dimensions, annular inner arcs and radial gaps, compatible square/linear units and question-specific precision; no universal3sf rule is invented. Radians are excluded; ordinary sector arc-plus-two-radii boundaries require0<θ<360, while a full disk has no radial cuts. Literal Book1 SS1 tags B/C/D/E and HigherA with Hubs47/48/118, plus Number4A/Hub14, are navigation only; no Book2 tag or verified Hub body is inferred. Public SS1contents summary98 versus actual99 and Number4map198–206 versus proof199–207/next208 stay explicit. Chosen compound/inverse/annular safeguards do not add source rows or grant construction, volume, similarity, full-book, specialist, mastery or formal-assessment credit. Section4.10 adds nine original 3D shapes and volume lessons for six shared F4.10A–F rows and one additional H4.10A row. The first seven are shared; the final sphere and right-cone lessons are additional Higher. Teach all seven named solid families, complete face/edge/vertex incidence with hidden features, planar triangle/rectangle surface inventories and cylinder surfaces with actual open/closed conditions. F4.10E requires both complete prism and cylinder-volume slices; H4.10A requires both complete sphere and right-cone surface-and-volume slices. Every required source-bound record needs substantive teaching, worked methods, checks and all Guided/Independent/Transfer stages. Preserve actual face altitudes, positive inverse dimensions, full-length groove conditions, internal capacity and fill levels, contact-patch removal, cubic unit factors and1L=1000cm³. Curved-solid tasks state their flat-face/rim/apex convention without inventing a universal mark-scheme count. Nets, joins, inverse applications and solid hemispheres are chosen breadth, not extra official rows or instrument, frustum, similarity, pyramid-volume or hollow-capacity credit. Keep exact values/π and question-specific precision, including explicit significant trailing zeroes or scientific form. Literal Book2 Shape and Space9 tags C/D/E/F and HigherA are navigation only; no A/B or Book1 tags are inferred. Hubs56/57/55/84/131 do not establish body coverage, and no F4.10F Hub tag is invented. Map359–385 versus proof358–384/next385 remains unresolved; relevant chapter body and full-book/Hub content are unavailable. Specialist, formal-assessment and mastery approval remain pending. Section4.11 adds seven original Similarity lessons for exactly two shared F4.11A/B rows and three additional H4.11A/B/C rows. The first four are shared correspondence, forward/inverse lengths, maps and plans; the final three cover area factors, volume factors and mixed problems. F4.11A requires both complete correspondence and length slices, and F4.11B requires both map and plan slices, with source binding, substantive teaching, worked methods, checks and every explained Guided/Independent/Transfer stage in the same actual record. Retain matching angles and every corresponding side, concave reflex corners, positive factors, inverse recovery, parallel/shared-vertex hypotheses, whole/part order, compatible units, route versus direct distance, and uniform print-resizing scale recovery. Higher work distinguishes k, k² and k³, positive roots, similarity hypotheses, unit powers, actual closed-cuboid total surfaces, physical dimensions, exact money before rounding, and parallel-section cone subtraction as a chosen application. No extra official row, transformations, instrument calibration, formal construction or general frustum-formula credit is claimed. Literal Book2 Shape and Space6 F4.11B/Hub36, Shape and Space7 F4.11A/Hub85, and Shape and Space9 H4.11A/B/C with Hubs143/144 are navigation only, with no Book1 tag invented. Shape and Space6 map128–160/proof128/summary159/next161, Shape and Space7 map223–248/proof222/summary247/next248, and Shape and Space9 map359–385/proof358/summary384/next385 remain explicit. The actual proof places Similar shapes at147 under Shape and Space6 while the literal F4.11A map tag remains under Shape and Space7; this topic-location conflict is unresolved. Relevant chapter and Hub bodies are unavailable; no full-book, specialist, formal-assessment or mastery approval follows. Section5.1 adds nine original additional Higher Vectors lessons for exactly H5.1A–G and no shared Foundation rows. All required source-bound notation, scalar, arithmetic, magnitude, route, position/division, parallel/collinear, simple-proof and intersection strands need substantive original teaching, an explained worked example and exactly one complete Guided/Independent/Transfer task in the same record. Preserve directed endpoints, signed/scalar and zero-vector exceptions, exact fractions and radicals, final-only rounding, current own head-to-tail joins, one-origin positions, t=0/t=1 endpoints and external points without clamping. Geometric conclusions require actual nonzero, nonparallel, noncollinear or simple-boundary hypotheses; formal two-to-four-symbol planar identities do not assert an independent spatial basis. H5.1G requires genuine explained geometric proof, not numerical resemblance or unchecked text. The H4.6C local theorem-proof note is not a blanket vector-proof waiver. Literal Book2 Shape and Space10 H5.1A–G map427–450/proof426/summary449/next450 remains unresolved; Hub167 covers A/B/C/D/F,168 A/E and169 G. Navigation does not establish modular equivalence. No Book1 tag or unseen Vectors chapter/Hub body is invented: the public uncorrected2025proof exposes contents and Number8 body, not Vectors. November2026/June2027 linear entry and regional-centre limits remain separate. Full-book, specialist, mastery and formal-assessment approval remain pending. Section5.2 adds twelve original shared Transformation geometry lessons across exactly F5.2A–M and no additional Higher row. Full source-bound bundles require substantive teaching, explained worked and exactly one complete Guided/Independent/Transfer task in each record. Retain every labelled corner and corresponding trace, signed/general rotations, complete equivalent mirror lines, common translation columns, rigid distances/angles, positive and fractional factors, supplied/free centres and factor1 identity exceptions. General-degree written3dp is separate from unrounded geometry. Ordered compositions are chosen breadth rather than an extra source row; compare both orders, including commuting perpendicular reflections, and distinguish reverse order from the inverse. Source/book/year and proof/physical-construction limits remain explicit. Graphical representation6.1 adds ten original lessons: six shared Foundation tabulation/two-way/pictogram/bar/pie/interpretation slices and four additional Higher histogram construction/reading and cumulative construction/use slices. Each complete source-bound record and every practice stage are required; tables or diagram names alone do not establish actual construction. Keep scales/units/keys, zero categories, unequal continuous widths and density/area, hidden missing calibration and pie labels, uniform partial-class estimates, cumulative boundaries and nonunique flat inverses. No Statistical measures6.2 or Probability6.3 credit follows. Literal book/Hub metadata is navigation only: Book2 Handling Data4 F6.1Aii is a modular subpart; Book1 Handling Data3 map398 starts differently from proof397 and Book2 Handling Data6 map208 from proof207. Relevant chapter/Hub bodies remain unavailable. Statistical measures6.2 adds eight original lessons: four shared Foundation list/frequency averages, simple mean problems and grouped midpoint estimates/modal classes; four additional Higher spread, discrete quartiles, median and IQR from cumulative diagrams. Every source-bound record needs substantive teaching, its explained worked example and all three unique practice stages. Preserve repeated positions, weighted counts, observed zero-frequency extremes, compatible units, grouped estimation limits, the explicitly chosen median-of-halves convention, actual graph guides, each curve’s own total and nonunique plateau intervals. Literal Book2 Handling Data4/5/6 tags and Hubs are navigation metadata only; no Book1 tag, complete chapter body or Hub access is inferred. Handling Data6 map208–222 versus proof207/summary221/next222 stays explicit. Statistical measures alone does not replace Probability6.3 teaching. Probability6.3 adds nine original lessons for ten shared F6.3A–J and four additional H6.3A–D rows. The first five are shared language/scales/models, complete single/two-event sample spaces, Venn probabilities, experimental estimates/expected frequencies and complement/mutually-exclusive addition; the final four are Higher independent trees, actual without-replacement trees, simple conditioning and contextual inverse/mixed models. Each required source-bound strand needs substantive teaching, an explained worked example and exactly one complete Guided/Independent/Transfer task in the same actual record. F6.3C requires both model and sample-space slices; H6.3A requires independent, dependent and application trees; H6.3B requires independent and application slices; H6.3C requires without-replacement, simple-conditioning and application slices; H6.3D requires conditioning and application slices. Retain physical identities, nonuniform weights, original ordered histories, complete branches/terminal events, unchanged versus changing contents, restricted positive conditional denominators and undefined empty conditioning. Experimental variability and fractional expected counts are model predictions rather than guaranteed observations. Inverse physical counts keep original nonnegative integer/positive-total domains. Chosen three-set, three-stage and inverse safeguards do not add source rows or a named general conditional theorem. Literal Book1 HandlingData1/2/3 tags and Hubs are navigation only; no Book2 tag or unseen probability chapter/Hub body is invented. Preserve map228–242/proof229–243/next244, map303/proof304–328/next329 and map398–428/proof397/summary426/next428; missing explicit Hub A/B/F/J tags remain absent. The common two-coin elementary model is not claimed as novel. All39 source sections and242 requirements now have structural teaching/practice links; that is not exhaustive subskill, teacher, full-book, mastery, specialist or formal-assessment approval. The independent source inventory contains 162 Foundation requirements and 80 additional Higher requirements; some lettered requirements contain multiple skills. A lesson link alone does not verify every skill or examination readiness. Written practice is self-checked, not automatically marked. Specialist approval and cumulative assessment have not been established. This course follows the linked Issue 2 linear 4MA1 specification. The 2026/2027 entry manual lists F/H in November 2026 and June 2027; regional FR/HR entries are June 2027 only and depend on centre eligibility. Modular 4XMAF and 4XMAH coverage is separate.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.