Run, evaluate and improve an event
Manage time, customer care, feedback and problems during an event, then evaluate evidence, team contribution and personal learning.
Section Paper 2 · Planning and Managing a Travel and Tourism Event · Topic 5
Exam scope and assessment notes
This original lesson maps Cambridge International AS & A Level Travel & Tourism 9395 syllabus sections 5.5, 5.6 for exams in 2027, 2028 and 2029. Build AO1 knowledge, AO2 application, AO3 analysis and research, and AO4 evaluation. Examples and practice are original StudyForA material, not Cambridge questions, mark schemes or official grades. Use current, reliable local evidence; tourism effects and customer needs depend on context. Paper 2 requires learners to plan and manage a real event as a team, then present their project individually. This site can teach and simulate the planning process, but cannot conduct the event, verify participation or evidence, replace centre approval and supervision, award a coursework mark, or provide Cambridge moderation.
Before you begin
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
Before you start: What should a team do when the event departs from the plan?
What you will learn
- Explain timekeeping, customer care, feedback and problem-solving during event delivery.
- Identify suitable evidence that the event took place, collected lawfully and with appropriate consent.
- Evaluate outcomes, the team and personal contribution, then recommend practical improvements to planning, preparation and delivery.
Run the plan while adapting safely
Monitor time, attendance, transitions and service quality against the itinerary. Give visitors accurate updates and invite feedback, while prioritising safety and centre procedures.
If a problem occurs, confirm facts, assign responsibility, choose an authorised response and communicate the change. Keep a record of decisions and what happened, not only what was intended.
Evaluate evidence and learning
Potential evidence may include customer surveys, witness statements, annotated photographs, screenshots, advertisements, discussions, group chats or blogs. Use only appropriate evidence, with centre guidance, permissions and data protection; do not expose private information.
Compare results with goals and costs, evaluate the team and your own contribution, and make specific recommendations for planning, preparation or delivery. Separate evidence of an event taking place from evidence that it met its aims.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
What is the best basis for an improvement recommendation?
Worked example
At a visitor event, a speaker is delayed and participants begin waiting. Explain the immediate response and what the team should record for evaluation.
Show the worked solution
- Confirm the delay, assess visitor and safety needs and use the authorised contingency, such as a revised sequence or alternative activity.
- Tell participants what is known, when the next update will arrive and where to get help.
- Record the actual timings, decision, feedback and effect on the planned objectives.
Answer Use the approved contingency, communicate verified information and record actual outcomes and visitor response for later evaluation.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
A group arrives 25 minutes late and the attraction cannot extend its closing time. Show how the team should adapt and keep a useful evidence record.
Give me a hint
Protect safety and essential objectives; record what changed and why.
Compare my reasoning
- Confirm the new arrival time and remaining access window with the attraction and team lead.
- Select an authorised shorter route or rescheduling option and tell visitors what will change.
- Record planned and actual timings, the decision, visitor feedback and any objective that could not be completed.
Adapt the itinerary with the provider's approval and communicate the revised plan. The record should show the actual outcome, not imply the original itinerary was delivered.
Look for these in your work
- Verifies operational constraints
- Communicates a feasible change
- Records actual evidence
Plan an evaluation of whether a tourism fair met its goals for visitor learning, local-provider participation and safe delivery.
Give me a hint
Use one suitable measure for each goal and compare it with the plan.
Compare my reasoning
- Check learning through a short visitor response or activity evidence, interpreted within its limits.
- Record provider attendance and feedback against the planned participation target.
- Review safety records and incident/near-miss procedures with the centre, then compare all outcomes with goals and costs.
Use separate evidence for learning, provider participation and safety, then compare results with the stated targets. A successful event can still have gaps that need action.
Look for these in your work
- Measures each goal
- Uses appropriate evidence
- Compares outcomes with targets
Write one balanced recommendation after an event that exceeded attendance targets but ran over budget and received mixed feedback about access.
Give me a hint
Acknowledge success, trace the budget and access evidence, and propose a testable change.
Compare my reasoning
- Recognise the attendance result while checking whether it caused additional cost or capacity strain.
- Review specific access feedback and verify which journey or facility barriers were reported.
- Recommend a costed response, owner and measure for the next event, such as an accessible route audit before ticket release.
Attendance exceeded its target, but the budget and access results reveal unresolved issues. A specific pre-event access check and cost control should be assigned and measured next time.
Look for these in your work
- Balances positive and weak outcomes
- Uses specific feedback
- Makes an actionable recommendation
Common mistakes
- Following the original itinerary when conditions make it unsafe or impractical
- Treating photographs or screenshots as usable without permission and policy checks
- Writing a reflection with no evidence or actionable recommendation
What can you explain now?
What is the best basis for an improvement recommendation?
Compare with the explanation
A specific difference between the goal, evidence and outcome
A strong response applies the concept to the evidence, explains the effect and qualifies its conclusion where conditions matter.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Name one live-event indicator, one suitable feedback method and one piece of evidence that needs careful privacy handling.
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.