Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9700

Investigate limiting factors in whole plants

Plan whole-plant or aquatic-plant tests of light intensity, carbon dioxide concentration and temperature.

Section 13.2 · Limiting factors

Photosynthesis investigations pathway · 13.2

A Level; Cambridge International Biology 9700, 2028–2030. Written practice is self-checked; practical investigations need supervised work and human subject-teacher review remains pending.

Before you begin

  • Chloroplasts contain photosynthetic pigments, and enzymes catalyse metabolic reactions.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

If testing carbon dioxide concentration, which factor should be varied systematically?

What you will learn

  • Describe whole-plant measurements for photosynthesis rate
  • Control conditions and evaluate indirect gas-rate measures

Build the explanation

Whole plants, including aquatic plants, can be used to investigate how light intensity, carbon dioxide concentration or temperature affects photosynthesis rate. Measure oxygen production or carbon dioxide uptake over a fixed time using a suitable gas collector or sensor, then calculate a rate. Change one factor at a time, keep plant species and size, water supply, light spectrum and other conditions consistent, and allow the sample to equilibrate. Repeat each condition and use a control where possible.

Apply it carefully

Counting bubbles is a convenient proxy but bubble sizes vary, so it is less reliable than collected gas volume or a calibrated sensor. A rise in oxygen output is an indirect measure and net gas exchange also reflects respiration. Prevent lamp heating when changing light distance, and distinguish the measured range from a universal optimum.

Pause and explain

Why can counting bubbles give a less reliable gas-rate estimate than collecting volume?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A plant releases 9 cm³ oxygen in 3 minutes. Calculate its mean oxygen-release rate.

Show the worked solution
  1. Divide gas volume by elapsed time.
  2. 9 ÷ 3 = 3 cm³ per minute.

Answer 3 cm³ min⁻¹.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Outline a whole-plant method to test how carbon dioxide concentration affects photosynthesis rate.

Give me a hint

Include the carbon dioxide treatment, gas measurement, controls and repeats.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Expose matched plants to different CO₂ concentrations at the same light and temperature.
  2. Measure oxygen volume or CO₂ exchange over fixed time, calculate rate and repeat conditions.

Use matched whole plants or aquatic shoots with different controlled carbon dioxide concentrations. Keep light intensity, temperature, species, shoot size and time constant. Measure oxygen production or carbon dioxide uptake with a suitable sensor or collected gas volume, calculate rate and repeat each concentration. Use a control and supervised handling.

Look for these in your work

  • CO₂ varied
  • Other factors controlled
  • Direct gas measurement described
  • Rate and repeats stated
2 · Independent

An aquatic plant produces 18 cm³ oxygen in 6 minutes at one light intensity and 30 cm³ in 6 minutes at another. Calculate both rates and compare them.

Give me a hint

Divide each volume by the same time.

Compare my reasoning
  1. 18 ÷ 6 = 3 cm³/min.
  2. 30 ÷ 6 = 5 cm³/min; the second measured rate is 2 cm³/min higher.

The first rate is 3 cm³ min⁻¹ and the second is 5 cm³ min⁻¹. The second measured rate is 2 cm³ min⁻¹ greater under the tested conditions.

Look for these in your work

  • Both calculations correct
  • Units included
  • Comparison bounded to conditions
3 · Transfer

A student moves a lamp closer to increase intensity and observes more bubbles. Explain one confound and one measurement limitation.

Give me a hint

Consider lamp heating and variable bubble volume.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The closer lamp may warm the plant or water, changing temperature.
  2. Bubble counts do not give a precise gas volume because bubble size varies.

Moving the lamp closer may also raise temperature, so light intensity is not isolated unless temperature is controlled. Bubble counts are an imprecise rate measure because bubble volume varies; a gas syringe, collector or sensor can measure volume more directly.

Look for these in your work

  • Temperature confound identified
  • Bubble-size limitation stated
  • Improved measurement suggested

Common mistakes

  • Changing light distance without controlling temperature
  • Treating bubbles as equal volumes
  • Calling net oxygen output a direct carbohydrate measurement
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

If testing carbon dioxide concentration, which factor should be varied systematically?

Compare with the explanation

Carbon dioxide concentration

Other conditions such as light and temperature should be controlled.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How can a whole-plant experiment compare photosynthesis rates fairly and reliably?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Biology

Course scope and assessment

Two hundred and fifty-nine new lessons map every published learning outcome in Cambridge International Biology 9700 Topics 1–19 for exams 2028–2030. Each topic lesson includes guided, independent and transfer practice. Fifteen additional practical-assessment lessons provide online preparation for Paper 3 and Paper 5 practical assessment skills. Online Paper 3 lessons cannot provide supervised laboratory competence. Full timed cumulative exam practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding, so this is not exam-readiness evidence.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.