Crocodiles · a divided boat and a missing companion
Explain how uncertain direction becomes a conflict within the group · Distinguish losing sight of Liaqat from knowing every detail of his fate · Analyse how the later conversation gives scale to a remembered danger
Section SET-2025-3 · 2025 · Paper 3 · In the Sea There are Crocodiles
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2025, 2026, 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for the 2025–2027 Paper 3 option In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, by Fabio Geda, translated by Howard Curtis. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters, with passage, whole-book essay, voice and retrieval workshops. All three complete 2025–2027 selected-work entries link this whole-book teaching pathway. Reading completion, qualified teacher assessment and calibrated full papers are not certified by these self-review exercises. Read the entire unabridged centre-selected book; lessons and models do not replace it. The public reader is a reflowed 133-page version; its page numbers are locators, not certified centre-edition pagination. Use your copy for exact wording, typography and paragraph breaks. The protected book is linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported readings can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. In 2025–2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This book is not a 2028–2030 Paper 3 option. It is excluded from 2025–2027 coursework because it is on those years’ Paper 3 lists; private candidates cannot enter 0408. The lessons analyse a narrative of past experience, not present-day travel, legal or personal-safety advice.
Before you begin
- Read the Author’s Note and the named chapter scenes in the centre’s complete Howard Curtis translation. Use the linked reader’s text version if needed; its page numbering differs from print editions.
- Distinguish the experiencing child, the later narrating Enaiat, Fabio’s conversational questions and the authorial/translation process. Reconstructed dialogue is not a certified recording.
- Read all six country chapters before the whole-book workshops. Teaching availability does not certify individual reading, mastery or an official assessment result.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Explain how uncertain direction becomes a conflict within the group
- Distinguish losing sight of Liaqat from knowing every detail of his fate
- Analyse how the later conversation gives scale to a remembered danger
Crocodiles · direction, disappearance and arrival
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected book or the linked public reading before answering. The protected book is not reproduced here.
- Reader page numbers identify this web version only. Use chapter and scene locators when working with another edition.
- Write your own developed response before opening the model. Use brief accurate evidence from your copy; paraphrase plainly when exact wording is uncertain.
Original whole-book teaching and self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated full paper. The lessons and models do not replace reading the complete centre-selected book or qualified assessment.
A boat working against itself
Read the opening sea sequence and disagreement, reader pp.96–97.
1. How does the writing make the crossing a crisis of shared judgement as well as physical danger?
Compare after trying
Darkness and waves prevent reliable orientation, while the boys turn fear into opposing decisions. Their effort becomes counterproductive because they row and then fight against one another.
Hussein Ali’s plea draws attention back to the task they share. Enaiat’s refusal to repeat the journey is understandable, but it does not settle their location. I read the boat as a small community whose survival needs cooperation that fear makes difficult.
Why this response fits
- Connect perception, disagreement and action.
- Do not make the eventual arrival proof of earlier navigational certainty.
A companion the story cannot restore
Read the passing vessel, Liaqat’s disappearance and the flag, reader pp.97–100.
1. How does the telling prevent the arrival in Greece from swallowing up Liaqat’s loss?
Compare after trying
The brief physical contact before Liaqat disappears makes the loss personal, and the search and repeated calling continue after the vessel has passed. Fabio’s questions pause the journey and insist on attention to what happened.
The crew’s awareness and Liaqat’s final fate remain unknown. The flag gives the survivors a location, but the group is now four rather than five. I find the arrival qualified by that missing person, rather than a victory which restores everyone.
Why this response fits
- Analyse pacing and the listener’s intervention.
- Retain the unsuccessful search and the limits of knowledge.
Working hard does not establish a direction
The boat’s movement is experienced through darkness, waves and uncertainty about which coast lies where. The boys’ arguments divide their rowing instead of producing progress. Hussein Ali’s imaginative explanations convey how immense the water seems to a small child; they are not scientific descriptions of an uphill sea or a collapsing mountain. The narrator’s determination to continue draws force from the fear of repeating the whole journey. It does not prove that he knows their position or that the others’ desire to turn back is simply cowardice. The group’s vulnerability grows from disagreement as well as the sea.
The story pauses over a particular loss
The large vessel passes close, but the account does not establish whether anyone aboard sees the boys. Its waves throw Liaqat from the dinghy. The remaining boys search and call, without finding him. Do not add a witnessed drowning, a rescue, a later reunion or a deliberate decision by the ship’s crew to ignore them. Fabio’s questions slow the telling, giving a physical comparison from the present room to help the listener imagine distance. His clarification makes the loss harder to pass over, while the narrator’s uncertainty about what happens next remains part of the account.
Arrival changes a border without cancelling absence
At dawn, land is not immediately identified. The Greek flag eventually gives a name to the place, and the four remaining boys reach shore without their clothes. The change from five to four matters to the meaning of arrival: a new country is reached with a companion missing. Relief is therefore inseparable from loss and continuing exposure. Later comparisons with an Italian amusement park belong to the teller’s subsequent experience; their familiarity does not make the earlier terror amusing. Read the two times together without converting the retrospective comparison into the child’s original thought.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Geda · In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · Howard Curtis translation · public 133-page reading and text version
- Howard Curtis · first-person account of translating Geda’s book · English PEN
- In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · publisher’s edition and translator record · Penguin
Pause and explain
Does the narrative establish that the ship’s crew sees the dinghy and deliberately refuses help?
Worked example
Qualify “They reach Greece because Enaiat always knows which way to row”.
Show the worked solution
- The boys disagree about direction and row against one another.
- They identify the shore only later through a flag.
Answer Determination continues in the absence of secure knowledge; arrival cannot retrospectively supply that knowledge.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
How does the argument make the boat’s vulnerability collective?
Give me a hint
Connect disagreement with action.
Compare my reasoning
- The boys favour opposing directions.
- Their rowing and fighting work against one another.
The conflict gives fear a physical consequence and challenges the idea of one competent leader controlling the crossing.
Look for these in your work
- Use actions as evidence
- Avoid hindsight certainty
What do Fabio’s questions change?
Give me a hint
Read the interruption instead of skipping it.
Compare my reasoning
- He asks about distance and then clarifies Liaqat’s fall.
- The teller must slow down and explain what the others did.
The dialogue gives scale and attention to a loss that could otherwise disappear inside a rapid journey summary.
Look for these in your work
- Use the conversational form
- Explain its emotional effect
Why is the flag not a complete happy ending?
Give me a hint
Compare a named place with the people who reach it.
Compare my reasoning
- The flag establishes Greece after uncertainty.
- Four boys arrive, with Liaqat still missing and immediate needs unmet.
A geographical success contains loss rather than erasing it.
Look for these in your work
- Use the changed group
- Distinguish place and security
Common mistakes
- Do not write that all five boys land in Greece together.
- Do not turn the unsuccessful search for Liaqat into a confirmed account of his final moments.
What can you explain now?
Does the narrative establish that the ship’s crew sees the dinghy and deliberately refuses help?
Compare with the explanation
No; the narrator cannot tell whether the vessel’s people have seen them.
The ship’s passage and its effects are narrated, but the crew’s knowledge and intention are not established.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Does the narrative establish that the ship’s crew sees the dinghy and deliberately refuses help?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.