Crocodiles · telling a life and hearing a mother again
Distinguish asylum as a narrated outcome from universal legal advice · Analyse the hearing’s return to the dangers and effects of the journey · Explain a circular ending which reconnects without undoing separation
Section 2025-P3-A · 2025–2027 · Set-text extract response
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2025, 2026, 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for the 2025–2027 Paper 3 option In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, by Fabio Geda, translated by Howard Curtis. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters, with passage, whole-book essay, voice and retrieval workshops. All three complete 2025–2027 selected-work entries link this whole-book teaching pathway. Reading completion, qualified teacher assessment and calibrated full papers are not certified by these self-review exercises. Read the entire unabridged centre-selected book; lessons and models do not replace it. The public reader is a reflowed 133-page version; its page numbers are locators, not certified centre-edition pagination. Use your copy for exact wording, typography and paragraph breaks. The protected book is linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported readings can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. In 2025–2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This book is not a 2028–2030 Paper 3 option. It is excluded from 2025–2027 coursework because it is on those years’ Paper 3 lists; private candidates cannot enter 0408. The lessons analyse a narrative of past experience, not present-day travel, legal or personal-safety advice.
Before you begin
- Read the Author’s Note and the named chapter scenes in the centre’s complete Howard Curtis translation. Use the linked reader’s text version if needed; its page numbering differs from print editions.
- Distinguish the experiencing child, the later narrating Enaiat, Fabio’s conversational questions and the authorial/translation process. Reconstructed dialogue is not a certified recording.
- Read all six country chapters before the whole-book workshops. Teaching availability does not certify individual reading, mastery or an official assessment result.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Distinguish asylum as a narrated outcome from universal legal advice
- Analyse the hearing’s return to the dangers and effects of the journey
- Explain a circular ending which reconnects without undoing separation
Crocodiles · a decision, a call and an open future
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected book or the linked public reading before answering. The protected book is not reproduced here.
- Reader page numbers identify this web version only. Use chapter and scene locators when working with another edition.
- Write your own developed response before opening the model. Use brief accurate evidence from your copy; paraphrase plainly when exact wording is uncertain.
Original whole-book teaching and self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated full paper. The lessons and models do not replace reading the complete centre-selected book or qualified assessment.
A life told under judgement
Read the letter, hearing, newspaper and asylum decision, reader pp.128–130.
1. How does the hearing make the act of telling consequential without turning the scene into a universal recipe?
Compare after trying
The friend’s refusal makes a similar personal history a source of fear rather than reassurance. Enaiat chooses direct speech and tells how past danger continues to disturb sleep in the new household.
The commissioner’s challenge makes that account contested, and the newspaper gives Enaiat a way to name a possible life he has escaped. The later decision matters profoundly, but its narrated sequence is not a general legal guarantee. I read the scene as a particular life being heard under uncertain authority.
Why this response fits
- Connect anticipation, narrative and judgement.
- Attribute beliefs about interpretation and retain the limits of a single case.
The sound of two lives continuing
Read the search for the family, telephone call and coda, reader pp.130–132; return to the opening farewell.
1. How does the ending answer the opening separation without simply undoing it?
Compare after trying
Contact depends on a chain of people and on the security which lets Enaiat think towards his family again. His mother has moved, so neither the old address nor the old childhood is waiting unchanged.
The call brings breathing and shared crying where an explanatory dialogue might have been expected. Knowing she is alive also allows a tentative recognition of his own life. I find the ending circular but open: the separation is answered by contact, while eight years, distance and the hoped-for physical reunion remain real.
Why this response fits
- Connect the changed circumstances with the opening.
- Keep the telephone contact distinct from a face-to-face meeting and total recovery.
A similar story does not guarantee a similar judgement
Another boy’s refusal of asylum makes Enaiat fear that his own application will fail. At the hearing he chooses to speak without the offered interpreter, explaining a belief about communicating emotion directly. This is his judgement in this scene, not proof that interpreters cannot convey emotion or that other applicants should refuse help. The hearing returns to Nava, the journey and disturbed sleep after arrival. Corners, the car and the bathroom show past habits continuing within a new home. Read their narrative effect without turning the description into a diagnosis or a universal account of recovery.
The claim to safety is contested, then an outcome follows
A commissioner questions why return would be dangerous. Enaiat responds with a newspaper account of a boy used in a violent act and identifies an alternative life into which he might have been forced. The report is evidence used within the scene, not a licence to identify every Afghan child with that act. Asylum is granted a few days later; the narration does not give a general legal test or guarantee that this single response always produces that result. The contrast with his friend’s refusal preserves the frightening uncertainty surrounding the outcome.
The opening separation returns through sound
Only after gaining the tranquillity he describes does Enaiat try to reconnect with his family, using friends across Iran and Pakistan. His mother has moved from Nava, and another person’s work makes the phone call possible. After eight years, breathing and shared crying carry more than a fluent exchange. This is renewed contact, not a physical reunion: the closing note says he hopes to see her. The possible recognition of his own life closes the circle without explaining away the original pain. The coda keeps age uncertain despite an administratively chosen birthday and corrects the earlier certainty about sea crocodiles. Neither narrative completion nor a recorded date makes every fact of the past fully recoverable.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Geda · In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · Howard Curtis translation · public 133-page reading and text version
- Howard Curtis · first-person account of translating Geda’s book · English PEN
- In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · publisher’s edition and translator record · Penguin
Pause and explain
What kind of reunion does the ending actually narrate?
Worked example
Correct “The ending reunites mother and son physically and proves his exact birth date”.
Show the worked solution
- They speak by telephone and still hope to meet.
- The date has been chosen by authorities while the age remains qualified.
Answer The ending reconnects lives without replacing distance and uncertainty with invented certainties.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Why include the other boy’s refused application?
Give me a hint
Use the similar history and different outcome.
Compare my reasoning
- Enaiat anticipates his own future through the friend’s experience.
- The refusal makes that future frightening rather than certain.
The comparison puts pressure on hope without determining the later decision in advance.
Look for these in your work
- Explain the comparison
- Keep outcomes separate
How does the hearing bring the journey into the new home?
Give me a hint
Connect remembered movement with disturbed sleep.
Compare my reasoning
- Past dangers return during the nights.
- He seeks corners and other places within the house.
Arrival changes surroundings while remembered patterns continue, complicating an instant-recovery ending.
Look for these in your work
- Use the recurring spaces
- Avoid a diagnosis
How can a nearly silent call complete a narrative of voice?
Give me a hint
Compare the opening absence with the final contact.
Compare my reasoning
- The early separation removes the mother’s available voice.
- Breathing and crying later make mutual life known without an explanatory speech.
The ending gives sound emotional recognition while leaving physical distance and some knowledge unresolved.
Look for these in your work
- Connect beginning and ending
- Retain the distance
Common mistakes
- Do not turn the choice to decline an interpreter into legal advice or a universal claim about translation.
- Do not describe asylum, contact or narrative closure as erasing all effects of the journey.
What can you explain now?
What kind of reunion does the ending actually narrate?
Compare with the explanation
A telephone reconnection after eight years; a physical meeting is still hoped for.
The coda preserves distance even as contact restores something vital.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
What kind of reunion does the ending actually narrate?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.