Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0610

Plan an osmosis investigation with dialysis tubing

Use stated membrane permeability, matched conditions and mass measurements.

Section 3.2 · Osmosis

Osmosis pathway · 3.2

Core and Extended; Biology 0610, 2026–2028. Use the stated specimen features and evidence. Diagrams are schematic. Written practice is self-checked

Before you begin

  • Recall osmosis and signed mass change.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Why blot the tubing consistently before weighing?

What you will learn

  • Use stated membrane permeability, matched conditions and mass measurements.
  • Apply the idea to a supplied biological example or investigation.
The specified tubing permits water and retains the named solute. A sealed bag increases from 12.0 g to 13.8 g, a gain of 1.8 g. Matched blotting and leak checks are required before interpreting the change as net water entry.A sealed membrane modelWater-permeable sealed bagMass comparison12.0 g → 13.8 g: +1.8 gBlot consistently · checkleaks
The specified tubing permits water and retains the named solute. A sealed bag increases from 12.0 g to 13.8 g, a gain of 1.8 g. Matched blotting and leak checks are required before interpreting the change as net water entry.

Define the membrane model

Dialysis tubing provides a classroom membrane model. Its permeability depends on the tubing and particle; this exercise explicitly uses a membrane that permits water but retains the named larger solute. Do not generalise that assumption to every solute or tubing product.

An investigation can put a solution in sealed tubing and immerse it in a different surrounding solution. Measure the sealed bag before and after the same interval. Check seals and leaks, and keep tubing dimensions, immersion time, temperature and blotting method comparable. Practical work requires teacher-approved materials and supervision.

Attribute the mass change carefully

Blot the outside consistently to remove surface liquid before weighing; do not squeeze water from the bag. A gain in bag mass is evidence consistent with net water entry when the solute is retained and there is no leak. A mass change alone is not proof that the membrane retained every solute.

A bag containing the same solution as the surrounding liquid is a useful comparison. Repeat the conditions, calculate changes and discuss measurement variation. Written planning and supplied data do not demonstrate that the learner has performed the practical competently.

Pause and explain

Why check the bag for leaks?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A sealed bag gains mass from 12.0 g to 13.8 g. The stated membrane passes water, retains the solute and has no leaks. Interpret the result.

Show the worked solution
  1. Change = 13.8 − 12.0 = 1.8 g.
  2. The retained solute cannot explain entry.
  3. Net water entered under the stated conditions.

Answer A 1.8 g gain, consistent with net water entry by osmosis.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A bag changes from 10.0 g to 11.2 g. Calculate mass change.

Give me a hint

Final minus initial.

Compare my reasoning
  1. 11.2 − 10.0 = 1.2 g.
  2. The sign is positive.

+1.2 g.

Look for these in your work

  • State gain.
2 · Independent

A bag changes from 15.0 g to 13.5 g under the stated retained-solute model. Interpret it.

Give me a hint

Find the signed change.

Compare my reasoning
  1. 13.5 − 15.0 = −1.5 g.
  2. With no leak, net water left.

A 1.5 g loss, consistent with net water leaving by osmosis.

Look for these in your work

  • Use the assumptions.
3 · Transfer

The initial bag is dry outside but the final bag drips. Explain why the apparent gain is unreliable.

Give me a hint

Separate attached liquid from internal contents.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Surface liquid adds final mass.
  2. Use the same gentle blotting method at both measurements.

Unequal surface liquid confounds mass change; standardise blotting.

Look for these in your work

  • Name the measurement error and repair.

Common mistakes

  • A wet outer surface can produce a misleading mass gain.
  • Check the stated solute permeability rather than guessing.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Why check the bag for leaks?

Compare with the explanation

A leak could change mass independently of osmosis.

The interpretation depends on the sealed model.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

List four controls and one leak check for a tubing investigation.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Biology

Course scope and assessment

780 sequenced lessons provide 2340 guided, independent and application problems in characteristics, classification, cells, organisation, specimen size, membrane transport, biological molecules, enzymes, plant and human nutrition, plant transport, circulatory systems, the heart, blood vessels, blood, disease transmission, body defences, immunity, gas exchange in humans, respiration energy uses and investigations, aerobic respiration, anaerobic respiration and recovery, excretion in humans, coordination and response, sense organs, hormones, homeostasis, tropic responses, drugs, asexual reproduction, sexual reproduction, sexual reproduction in plants, sexual reproduction in humans, sex hormones in humans, sexually transmitted infections, chromosomes, genes and proteins, mitosis, meiosis, monohybrid inheritance, variation, adaptive features, selection, energy flow, food chains and webs, nutrient cycles, population, community, ecosystem, population-growth phases, food supply, habitat destruction, pollution, conservation, biotechnology and genetic modification. 61 of 61 syllabus sections have linked teaching and staged practice. The earlier inheritance overview remains introductory, and the monohybrid pathway develops the relevant Core and Supplement requirements. This is not full programme completion or guaranteed exam readiness. Written practice is self-checked.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.