Unseen prose translation: build meaning before polishing English
Work through a fresh Latin passage by clauses, endings and verb forms, then write clear English.
Exam scope and assessment notes
Original teaching foundations for the 2026–2028 syllabus. Six prescribed texts have passage-specific sequences; all 693 printed vocabulary rows have been reconciled into 692 distinct records, with additional number, comparison and compound-verb practice. Linked teaching and lexical self-checks do not certify mastery. Complete line-by-line annotation, further translation and scansion practice, qualified Latin-teacher review, full timed papers and human marking remain outstanding. Open the assigned edition alongside these lessons: public ancient texts can differ in spelling, punctuation or editorial readings from the prescribed prose anthology. Practice explanations are formative, not Cambridge questions, marks or predicted grades. Cambridge has announced withdrawal; the last assessment is June 2028, in administrative zones 3, 4, 5 and 6 only. Confirm entry with your centre.
Before you begin
- Read a short Latin sentence with a finite verb
- Check endings and vocabulary in context
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
Which evidence should you check first when a Latin sentence is unclear?
What you will learn
- Parse clauses and preserve relationships before drafting.
- Write a coherent English translation that communicates the passage rather than copying Latin word order.
Read the whole sentence before choosing a meaning
Locate finite verbs, clause boundaries, conjunctions and any indirect speech. Then assign subjects and objects from case endings.
Use the syllabus vocabulary list and morphology to narrow meanings. A plausible English sentence is not enough if it changes who acted or why.
Make the English natural but faithful
Cambridge expects a sensible English rendering rather than a word-for-word substitution. Keep tense, negation, condition and reference clear.
Re-read against the Latin: every finite verb, modifier and clause should have an accounted-for meaning.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
What should you do after drafting a translation?
Worked example
Translate “Cum imber caderet, viatores in villa manserunt, quod via periculosa erat.”
Show the worked solution
- The cum-clause gives the weather context.
- Viatores is the subject of manserunt; in villa gives their location.
- Quod introduces a reason for staying.
Answer While rain was falling, the travellers stayed in the house because the road was dangerous. The translation preserves the background and the stated reason in clear English.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Translate “Puella epistulam amico misit, sed responsum exspectare noluit.”
Give me a hint
Find the two finite verbs and keep the contrast sed.
Compare my reasoning
- Misit is perfect singular; epistulam is its object.
- Amico is the recipient.
- Noluit governs exspectare; sed marks contrast.
The girl sent a letter to her friend, but did not want to wait for a reply. The infinitive completes noluit, and the negative remains attached to wanting.
Look for these in your work
- Parses both clauses
- Finds object and recipient
- Preserves negation and contrast
Translate “Dux, quod milites fessi erant, iter breviavit.”
Give me a hint
Separate the causal clause from the main action.
Compare my reasoning
- Quod introduces a stated reason.
- Milites fessi erant describes the soldiers.
- Iter breviavit is the main action.
Because the soldiers were tired, the leader shortened the journey. The causal clause explains why the leader changed it.
Look for these in your work
- Recognises the reason clause
- Identifies the main subject
- Keeps cause and result distinct
A first draft translates “Puer librum puellae dedit” as “The girl gave the boy a book.” Correct it and state the evidence.
Give me a hint
Check which noun is nominative, dative and accusative.
Compare my reasoning
- Puer is nominative.
- Puellae is dative; librum is accusative.
- Match dedit to puer as the giver.
The boy gave a book to the girl. Puer is the giver, librum is what was given, and puellae is the recipient; the first draft reversed the roles.
Look for these in your work
- Corrects the roles
- Uses all three cases
- Explains why the draft was wrong
Common mistakes
- Guessing before identifying the finite verbs
- Dropping a subordinate clause
- Producing smooth English that changes a case relationship
What can you explain now?
What should you do after drafting a translation?
Compare with the explanation
Check each English clause against the Latin form and relationship
A back-check catches omitted negation, tense shifts and misassigned subjects.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
What should you do after drafting a translation?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.