Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0625

Compare wire resistance when cross-sectional area changes

Explain qualitatively why a thicker matching metallic wire has lower resistance and distinguish transverse area from surface area.

Section 4.2.4 · Resistance

Resistance pathway · 4.2.4

Core and Extended; Physics 0625, 2026–2028. Use the stated source, operating conditions and meter ranges. Written practice is self-checked.

Before you begin

  • Explain mobile electrons in a metal.
  • Identify a section perpendicular to the wire's length.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Which cut gives a wire's cross-sectional area?

What you will learn

  • State the qualitative cross-sectional-area relationship.
  • Distinguish cross-section, surface area and changed material conditions.
Original equal-length wire cross-section comparison draws conducting areas A and 2A with circle radii in the ratio 1 to square-root two. Larger conducting area lowers resistance under matched material and temperature. Insulating coating is excluded; the Core comparison is qualitative.Same length, material, temperatureArea AArea 2ALarger conducting areaLower resistanceCoating is not conducting area
Original equal-length wire cross-section comparison draws conducting areas A and 2A with circle radii in the ratio 1 to square-root two. Larger conducting area lowers resistance under matched material and temperature. Insulating coating is excluded; the Core comparison is qualitative.

Use the transverse conducting area

For metallic wires with the same material, length and temperature, a larger cross-sectional area gives lower resistance. The larger transverse conducting region provides more room for carrier flow. A thinner matching wire has greater resistance.

Cross-sectional area is the area of a cut perpendicular to the length. It is not the total outside surface area of the wire and not merely its circumference. For a round wire, diameter and area are related but are not the same quantity. Quantitative area and diameter scaling is handled in the Supplement sequence.

Make a controlled comparison

A thicker wire of a different material cannot be ranked by thickness alone. Likewise, strong heating may change resistance during a trial. Match material, conducting length and temperature, and use secure comparable contacts so contact changes do not masquerade as sample behaviour.

An insulating coating increases an object's outside diameter without necessarily changing the metal core's conducting cross-section. Compare the actual conducting material, not the whole coated outline. This lesson states a qualitative change rather than a calibrated drawing-thickness ratio.

Pause and explain

A plastic coating thickens a wire's outside outline without changing the metal core. Does this alone increase the conducting cross-section?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Two metallic wires have the same material, length and temperature. One has greater conducting cross-sectional area. Which has lower resistance?

Show the worked solution
  1. The other relevant conditions match.
  2. Larger conducting area gives lower resistance.
  3. The thicker conducting wire has lower resistance.

Answer The wire with larger conducting cross-sectional area.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Compare thin and thick conducting wires with matching material, length and temperature.

Give me a hint

Use conducting cross-section rather than the outside coated outline.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The comparison holds the other influences fixed.
  2. The thicker conducting wire has greater transverse area.
  3. Its resistance is lower.

The thicker conducting wire has lower resistance.

Look for these in your work

  • State the controls.
  • Identify the conducting area.
2 · Independent

Explain why a wire's outside surface area is not the area meant in the resistance comparison.

Give me a hint

Specify the direction of the relevant cut.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The relevant section is perpendicular to length.
  2. Outside surface area extends along the wire.
  3. These are different geometric quantities.

The relevant area is the transverse conducting cross-section, not the outside surface.

Look for these in your work

  • Describe the cut.
  • Distinguish the two areas.
3 · Transfer

A metal core gets a thicker plastic coat but keeps the same core, length and temperature. Can lower core resistance be inferred from the larger outside diameter?

Give me a hint

Ask whether more conducting metal has been added.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The plastic is an insulating coating.
  2. The metal conducting cross-section is unchanged.
  3. The controlled area relationship gives no lower core resistance from the coat alone.

No; the conducting core area has not changed.

Look for these in your work

  • Identify the conducting region.
  • Avoid using the coated diameter as metal area.

Common mistakes

  • Use conducting cross-section, not outside surface area.
  • Hold material, length and temperature fixed.
  • An insulating coating need not change the metal area.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Under matched conditions, what happens when conducting cross-sectional area increases?

Compare with the explanation

Resistance decreases.

The qualitative relationship concerns the conducting core's transverse area.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Compare resistance by conducting cross-sectional area while retaining material, length and temperature controls.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Physics

Course scope and assessment

491 sequenced Physics lessons provide 1473 guided, independent and application problems. 58 of 58 syllabus sections have full linked teaching sequences; 0 sections remain pending. Three earlier starter overviews remain available but are not counted as full sequences. The map covers all six subject areas for 2026–2028 and keeps review and assessment limits visible. This is available content, not full programme completion, an exam grade or certified mastery. Written practice is self-checked. Supervised practical experience, cumulative assessment and human subject-teacher review remain pending. Paper method exercises do not demonstrate practical competence or complete either practical-assessment route.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.