Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0444

Complete the square and interpret a quadratic model

Rewrite a quadratic in completed-square form · Solve using the resulting square equation · Identify an extremum and select feasible contextual roots

Mathematics (US) 0444 · historical 2025 study · E2.11
Exam scope and assessment notes

Extended content; not a Core requirement. Historical study of Cambridge IGCSE Mathematics (US) 0444, 2025 Version 2. The final assessment was June 2025; the syllabus was available only to schools in Arizona, USA. This is not a current exam-entry option. Original self-check teaching and explained practice are not Cambridge papers, official marks or predicted grades. Linked teaching foundations do not establish full syllabus mastery. Calibrated cumulative assessment, reliable drawn-work review and qualified mathematics-teacher review remain unfinished.

Before you begin

  • Binomial squares
  • Quadratic equations

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What should you establish before applying the method in this lesson?

What you will learn

  • Rewrite a quadratic in completed-square form
  • Solve using the resulting square equation
  • Identify an extremum and select feasible contextual roots

Add and subtract the same square

For x²+bx+c, take half of b and square it: x²+bx+c = (x+b/2)²+c−(b/2)². Thus x²+6x+4 = (x+3)²−5. A squared term is non-negative, revealing minimum −5 at x = −3.

For a non-unit leading coefficient, factor it from the quadratic and linear terms first. A negative leading coefficient makes a downward parabola with a maximum. The turning-point input must lie in any restricted domain.

Equation and context

Setting (x+3)²−5 = 0 gives x+3 = ±√5, hence x = −3±√5. In a rectangle problem, if width w and length w+3 have area 40, then w²+3w−40 = 0; factorisation gives 5 or −8, but only the positive dimensions are feasible.

Sources for this lesson

Pause and explain

What is the minimum of (x+3)²−5 on all real x?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Complete the square for x²+6x+4, state its minimum and solve it equal to zero.

Show the worked solution
  1. (x+3)²−9+4 = (x+3)²−5.
  2. Minimum −5 at −3. Solving gives x+3 = ±√5.

Answer (x+3)²−5; minimum −5; roots −3±√5.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Complete the square for x²−8x+3 and state its minimum.

Give me a hint

Half of −8 is −4.

Compare my reasoning
  1. x²−8x+3 = (x−4)²−16+3.
  2. The square is non-negative.

(x−4)²−13; minimum −13 at x = 4.

Look for these in your work

  • Keep the added/subtracted square
  • Locate the zero-square input
2 · Independent

Solve x²−8x+3 = 0 by completing the square.

Give me a hint

Use the form from the previous method.

Compare my reasoning
  1. (x−4)² = 13.
  2. x−4 = ±√13.

x = 4±√13.

Look for these in your work

  • Use both square roots
  • Keep exact values
3 · Transfer

A rectangular garden has width w, length w+3 and area 40 square units. Find the dimensions and explain the rejected root.

Give me a hint

Create an area equation before factorising.

Compare my reasoning
  1. w(w+3) = 40 gives (w+8)(w−5) = 0.
  2. w = 5 gives length 8; w = −8 gives negative width and length and is infeasible.

Width 5 and length 8; reject w = −8.

Look for these in your work

  • Construct the quadratic
  • Apply physical constraints

Common mistakes

  • Subtract the square you added.
  • An algebraic negative length is not feasible.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What is the minimum of (x+3)²−5 on all real x?

Compare with the explanation

−5, at x = −3.

The square is zero there and non-negative elsewhere.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

What is the minimum of (x+3)²−5 on all real x?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Mathematics (US)

Course scope and assessment

191 original lessons provide 573 guided, independent and application tasks. All 142 tier entries have linked teaching foundations: 55 Core and 87 Extended entries across 87 unique numbered sections in ten areas. Extended includes Core, so the tier-entry count is not a percentage of teaching time or student mastery. This is not full programme completion: qualified mathematics-teacher review, cumulative and exam-length assessment, and reliable drawn-work review remain unfinished. Historical study of Cambridge IGCSE Mathematics (US) 0444, 2025 Version 2. The final assessment was June 2025; the syllabus was available only to schools in Arizona, USA. This is not a current exam-entry option. Original self-check teaching and explained practice are not Cambridge papers, official marks or predicted grades. Linked teaching foundations do not establish full syllabus mastery. Calibrated cumulative assessment, reliable drawn-work review and qualified mathematics-teacher review remain unfinished.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.