Anowa · wealth, idleness and the argument over belonging
Track the changed distribution of loads and work · Explain why material comfort does not answer Anowa’s concerns · Read the parents and elders as changing, limited commentators
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2025, 2026. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for Anowa, the 2025 and 2026 Paper 3 drama option. Read the complete unabridged centre-selected play; these notes and models do not replace it. The linked 2003 pupils’ edition explicitly contains the complete play, with separate editorial notes and BECE exercises. Its page numbers are reading locators, not Cambridge question numbers; those editorial notes and exercises are not reproduced or used as StudyForA models. Exact wording and pagination may differ from your centre’s edition. The protected play is not reproduced on this site. All questions and models are original self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, grades or calibrated full papers. Other well-supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review remains required. In 2025–2026, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract question and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. Anowa is not the 2027 drama option or a revised 2028–2030 Paper 3 prose option. It is excluded from 2025–2026 coursework because it is on that year’s Paper 3 list; private candidates cannot enter 0408.
Before you begin
- Read Anowa’s Prologue and all three phases in the complete centre-selected play. Follow the reading locators before attempting each response.
- Distinguish dialogue, stage directions, recollection, dream and reported rumour. A character’s explanation is not automatically an established cause.
- Use the correct 2025 or 2026 option. Read the whole play before the final whole-text workshop; this sequence does not certify coursework eligibility or a Cambridge grade.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Track the changed distribution of loads and work
- Explain why material comfort does not answer Anowa’s concerns
- Read the parents and elders as changing, limited commentators
Anowa · prosperity and the place of a person
- Open the complete primary reading in Sources for this lesson, or use your centre’s unabridged play. The protected play is not reproduced here.
- Use the phase and scene locator; printed and PDF page numbers differ. Skip the separate editorial notes and BECE exercises when locating the primary dialogue.
- Write your own developed response before opening the model. Use brief accurate evidence from your copy and explain dramatic effects.
Original self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, assessed coursework or a calibrated full paper. The model is one supported interpretation and is not a substitute for the complete play.
Read, argue and reconsider
Read the parents’ return and the later road sequence to the end of Phase Two: printed pp.53–64, PDF pp.55–66.
1. Why does increasing wealth fail to give the characters a shared idea of a good life?
Compare after trying
The redistribution of loads gives Kofi relief and status, but removes the work through which Anowa understood herself as a partner. Their opposed responses to permanent rest show that prosperity does not have one agreed meaning. Her concern also extends to the people whose bodies now sustain it.
The wayfarer debate makes belonging depend on more than comfort, while the commentators disagree about which difference should be tolerated. I find the failure collective as well as personal: the community can celebrate the visible result without agreeing to hear the ethical and human costs on which it rests.
Why this response fits
- Ground the argument in a visible change and a debated idea.
- Keep the analogy with bondage qualified and include the surrounding community.
Time passes through visible changes
The later travelling procession gives other people the heavy loads while Kofi carries something conspicuously light. Anowa is no longer carrying a basket, yet her clothes and bare feet connect her to the earlier working life. The shift is an argument staged through bodies before it is explained in words. Her difficulty keeping up cannot simply be read as proof that less work has made her happy. When Kofi proposes permanent rest, their disagreement concerns what gives a day purpose, not merely whether a tired person deserves a break.
Belonging is not guaranteed by ownership
The wayfarer discussion turns on several meanings of attachment: place, kinship, freedom and being owned. Anowa’s insistence that someone may belong to themselves resists the assumption that attachment must mean possession by another. Her comparison with the bought people exposes her felt exclusion, but does not erase differences between a wife with resources and an enslaved person. Kofi’s account of inclusion is challenged by her point about the priority of the free-born. A careful response can recognise a powerful analogy without converting it into an exact legal equivalence.
The return to commentators broadens responsibility
Badua’s wish to look for her daughter reveals continuing attachment, even as her advice about a good wife repeats the silencing Anowa resists. Osam’s sympathy also sits beside his gendered dismissals. The Old Man now questions prosperity founded on enslavement, while the Old Woman celebrates Kofi’s wealth and condemns Anowa. He is not automatically a wholly modern or infallible voice; his own reasoning still belongs to the community’s fears and assumptions. These returns move the question beyond one difficult marriage to the values by which success, normality and belonging are judged.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
Does Anowa’s comparison with wayfarers make her position identical to that of the people bought?
Worked example
Improve “Because Anowa has servants, her only problem is that she refuses happiness”.
Show the worked solution
- Use the change from shared labour to permanent idleness.
- Consider her moral objection and the loss of a meaningful role.
Answer Comfort is offered as an answer to concerns about purpose and exploitation that it does not itself resolve.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
How do the new loads change the meaning of prosperity?
Give me a hint
Compare the earlier pair with the later line of carriers.
Compare my reasoning
- Their earlier work was embodied by both partners.
- Other people now carry the loads while Kofi’s burden is light.
Prosperity becomes visible as a redistribution of effort and control, not an abstract increase in money.
Look for these in your work
- Compare two stages
- Explain who carries the cost
Why does another wife fail to resolve the disagreement about work?
Give me a hint
Ask what Anowa seeks beyond household management.
Compare my reasoning
- Kofi proposes idleness and a house role.
- Anowa seeks continued purposeful activity and a future she can recognise.
A different domestic arrangement cannot by itself restore the lost partnership or answer her ethical objection.
Look for these in your work
- Identify the actual disagreement
- Avoid reducing it to jealousy
Develop a qualified judgement about the Old Man’s sympathy.
Give me a hint
Compare his earlier inclusiveness with later criticism.
Compare my reasoning
- He challenges simple blame and the celebration of wealth.
- His arguments still draw on communal fears and inherited assumptions.
He opens a space for reconsideration without becoming a neutral substitute for the playwright.
Look for these in your work
- Trace change
- Keep the speaker situated
Common mistakes
- Do not assume the Old Man has no changing position across the play.
- Do not confuse temporary rest with Kofi’s proposal to stop their own work permanently.
What can you explain now?
Does Anowa’s comparison with wayfarers make her position identical to that of the people bought?
Compare with the explanation
No; it illuminates exclusion while material and legal differences remain.
A literary analogy can be revealing without making every condition the same.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Does Anowa’s comparison with wayfarers make her position identical to that of the people bought?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.