Little Foxes · wishes, percentages and who can make a bargain
Trace the movement from shared celebration to unequal negotiation · Distinguish the family stake from the entire mill arrangement · Analyse Regina’s tactical use of an absent person’s silence
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes, listed as Little Foxes in Cambridge’s 2027 Paper 3 selection. Twenty-two lessons teach all three acts of Little Foxes and four whole-play workshops, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed-response models. The complete SET-2027-2 option links this teaching for 2027; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. Complete primary reading, qualified teacher review and full timed calibration remain separate requirements. Read the complete unabridged centre-selected script. The linked public scan is a Dramatists Play Service acting edition with printed pages through 79; reader scan numbers and printed page numbers differ. Check exact wording, revisions, blocking and punctuation against the centre edition. The protected play and its page images are linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. For 2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This play is not a prescribed 2025 or 2026 Paper 3 option, nor a 2028–2030 Paper 3 prose option. It is excluded from 2027 coursework because it is on that year’s Paper 3 list; private candidates cannot enter 0408. Analyse the play’s racism, unequal relationships and domestic violence critically rather than adopting a character’s claims as the author’s or a general truth.
Before you begin
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected script; read all three acts before attempting the whole-play workshops. Reader scans are two-page views; printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition.
- Distinguish stage directions, observable action, a character’s claim and an inference about intention. A performance can realise the written directions in different ways.
- The teaching sequence does not prove individual mastery. Read the complete play, write your own responses and seek qualified literature-teacher feedback; full timed calibration remains unfinished.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Trace the movement from shared celebration to unequal negotiation
- Distinguish the family stake from the entire mill arrangement
- Analyse Regina’s tactical use of an absent person’s silence
Little Foxes · from a wish to a demand
- Read the named scenes in the complete script before answering. The protected play is not reproduced here.
- Printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition. Use the act and scene event when your centre edition differs.
- Write a developed answer before opening the original model. Use brief checked wording from your copy and explain the effect of dialogue, movement or timing.
Original self-review for whole-play preparation, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated paper. These lessons do not replace the complete play, the learner’s own writing or qualified assessment; they do not certify individual mastery.
Not all requests are heard alike
Read the family’s wishes and the return to profit shares, printed pp.15–19, reader scans 8–10.
1. How does this part of the act expose unequal power inside an apparently shared celebration?
Compare after trying
Regina invites wishes as though the new wealth will make everyone’s future available. Birdie’s picture of Lionnet and objection to wasteful shooting nevertheless continue after others have stopped giving her full attention.
The return to shares brings a different kind of speech, one backed by needed money and a threat to the arrangement. I read the contrast as a test of who can turn a desire into an effective demand, rather than simply a catalogue of what each person wants.
Why this response fits
- Use attention and interruption as evidence.
- Connect the celebration with the emerging bargain.
Interpreting a silence for profit
Read the discussion of Horace’s unanswered business letters and negotiated share, printed pp.19–23, reader scans 10–12.
1. How does Regina use the absence of Horace in her negotiation?
Compare after trying
His uncommitted replies leave a gap which Regina fills with an explanation about bargaining for more. That explanation places a price on her willingness to persuade him, while Ben’s response recognises her interest in the argument.
The larger proposed family portion and deadline show that the tactic changes the discussion, but not that Horace has agreed or that she has correctly described his mind. I find her agency forceful and limited by dependence on money and consent which are not yet in the room.
Why this response fits
- Distinguish an effective tactic from a verified account of motive.
- Keep the family share and the entire venture separate.
An invitation to wish does not give every wish equal force
After the visitor leaves, imagined pleasures make profit personal. Ben wants a stable, Regina a metropolitan social life, and Oscar values property and shooting. Birdie asks for Lionnet restored and for less killing when others need food. The stage directions make her continuing speech and the others’ withdrawal of attention visible. Her concerns are not all given the power of a proposal at the bargaining table. The transition from an apparently shared future to dismissal shows why an invitation to speak is different from a practical ability to have a request considered.
Be precise about the money being divided
Marshall is to provide four hundred thousand dollars for forty-nine per cent, while the family provides two hundred and twenty-five thousand for fifty-one per cent and local advantages. Horace’s proposed seventy-five thousand is one third of the family contribution, not one third of the entire cost or an automatic one-third ownership of the whole mill. The dialogue’s dispute concerns the division within the family stake. Knowing that distinction supports a literary reading of control and dependence; it does not require treating the scene as advice about how a real partnership or present-day business law works.
A silence becomes a resource for someone else’s demand
The others have letters from Horace but no answer about the venture. Regina proposes that his silence may be a trader’s attempt to obtain a larger share; Ben recognises her own interest in that explanation. Act I does not yet establish Horace’s actual reason. Her suggestion pressures the brothers because they want family control and need the missing funds. The eventual offer increases his proposed part of the family stake to forty per cent, with a deadline, and the extra comes from Oscar’s portion. The moment reveals tactical agency without making every person equally able to bargain or every claimed motive a verified fact.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Hellman · The Little Foxes · public Dramatists Play Service scan, 40 two-page reader views
- The Little Foxes · playwright and script record · Concord Theatricals
Pause and explain
Does Regina’s explanation of Horace’s silence establish his actual motive in Act I?
Worked example
Correct “Horace is offered forty per cent of the whole mill in Act I”.
Show the worked solution
- The family’s controlling stake is fifty-one per cent of the venture.
- The argument reallocates parts within that family stake.
Answer The scene offers a larger family portion, not an unqualified forty per cent of the entire mill.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
How does Birdie’s wish differ from an effective demand?
Give me a hint
Follow who continues to receive attention.
Compare my reasoning
- Her descriptions keep developing.
- Others return to their own plans and dismiss the request.
The staging shows that permission to speak does not guarantee power over the result.
Look for these in your work
- Use divided attention
- Explain the inequality
State the financial distinction without a false percentage.
Give me a hint
Name the whole before naming a fraction.
Compare my reasoning
- The family has a fifty-one per cent stake.
- Horace’s proposed contribution is a third of the family’s funding.
A claim about his negotiated family portion should not silently become a claim about ownership of the entire mill.
Look for these in your work
- Identify the denominator
- Keep the two arrangements separate
What does Ben’s response to Regina reveal?
Give me a hint
Compare her attributed motive with the interest he identifies.
Compare my reasoning
- She speaks as if protecting Horace’s bargaining position.
- Ben locates her own wish for a larger share.
The exchange makes interpretation itself part of the negotiation, while Horace’s actual motive remains unconfirmed in Act I.
Look for these in your work
- Use both positions
- Retain the absent voice
Common mistakes
- Do not confuse one third of the family contribution with one third of the total venture.
- Do not turn the negotiated deadline into proof that Horace has already agreed or paid.
What can you explain now?
Does Regina’s explanation of Horace’s silence establish his actual motive in Act I?
Compare with the explanation
No; it is her tactical explanation, and Ben recognises that it serves her own demand.
An absent person’s intention cannot be certified merely because another character claims to interpret it.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Does Regina’s explanation of Horace’s silence establish his actual motive in Act I?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.