Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0408

Little Foxes · guarantees, cheap labour and a refusal of profit

Explain why profitability does not settle Horace’s judgement · Read the guarantees beside earlier rhetoric about improvement · Retain the refusing character’s admission of complicity

Cambridge IGCSE World Literature 0408 · 2027-P3-FOXES / 2025-P3-A / 2025-P3-B
Exam scope and assessment notes

0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes, listed as Little Foxes in Cambridge’s 2027 Paper 3 selection. Twenty-two lessons teach all three acts of Little Foxes and four whole-play workshops, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed-response models. The complete SET-2027-2 option links this teaching for 2027; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. Complete primary reading, qualified teacher review and full timed calibration remain separate requirements. Read the complete unabridged centre-selected script. The linked public scan is a Dramatists Play Service acting edition with printed pages through 79; reader scan numbers and printed page numbers differ. Check exact wording, revisions, blocking and punctuation against the centre edition. The protected play and its page images are linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. For 2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This play is not a prescribed 2025 or 2026 Paper 3 option, nor a 2028–2030 Paper 3 prose option. It is excluded from 2027 coursework because it is on that year’s Paper 3 list; private candidates cannot enter 0408. Analyse the play’s racism, unequal relationships and domestic violence critically rather than adopting a character’s claims as the author’s or a general truth.

Before you begin

  • Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected script; read all three acts before attempting the whole-play workshops. Reader scans are two-page views; printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition.
  • Distinguish stage directions, observable action, a character’s claim and an inference about intention. A performance can realise the written directions in different ways.
  • The teaching sequence does not prove individual mastery. Read the complete play, write your own responses and seek qualified literature-teacher feedback; full timed calibration remains unfinished.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What should support a claim about a literary text?

What you will learn

  • Explain why profitability does not settle Horace’s judgement
  • Read the guarantees beside earlier rhetoric about improvement
  • Retain the refusing character’s admission of complicity

Little Foxes · a profitable thing refused

  • Read the named scenes in the complete script before answering. The protected play is not reproduced here.
  • Printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition. Use the act and scene event when your centre edition differs.
  • Write a developed answer before opening the original model. Use brief checked wording from your copy and explain the effect of dialogue, movement or timing.

Original self-review for whole-play preparation, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated paper. These lessons do not replace the complete play, the learner’s own writing or qualified assessment; they do not certify individual mastery.

What the guarantees reveal

Read the investment presentation and its guarantees, printed pp.44–47.

  1. 1. How does the detail of the deal change the earlier language of improvement?

    Compare after trying

    Ben’s named guarantees attach prosperity to cheap resources, labour and control over opposition. Horace’s questions make those conditions audible where the earlier hospitality had offered a more attractive picture.

    The prospect of profit is not disproved. Instead, its means become part of the judgement. I find the scene critical because it asks what and who must be made cheap for the promised success, rather than merely exposing a bad business calculation.

    Why this response fits

    • Analyse the concrete guarantees.
    • Distinguish financial possibility from moral approval.

A refusal from inside the system

Compare Horace’s earlier questions with his speech and Regina’s reply at the curtain, printed pp.46–47 and 53.

  1. 1. How does the act make Horace’s opposition significant without making him an uncomplicated hero?

    Compare after trying

    He does not claim the mill will fail, and his refusal develops into an account of what its dividends would cost the town. That separates his judgement from Regina’s account of jealous obstruction.

    He also admits previous harm and recognises that approaching death may make honesty easier. I would call the resistance meaningful but compromised. Regina’s reply intensifies the conflict without yet turning this act’s death wish into the later staged crisis.

    Why this response fits

    • Retain the past admission.
    • Distinguish the actual refusal from the motives other characters assign to it.

The bargain acquires the detail earlier manners concealed

Ben’s account now names cheap water power, low wages and the promise of no trouble from workers. His joking reference to the governor’s price gives the guarantee an additional corrupt implication within the dialogue. These details develop the earlier industrial optimism rather than leave the mill a neutral image of progress. Horace’s questions direct attention from the investors’ likely return towards the conditions that will produce it. Treat Ben’s claims as part of a specific fictional bargain, not a verified description of every person or industry in the South.

The refusal is not caused by failure to recognise a return

Horace accepts that the venture may make a great deal of money. His response therefore cannot be explained simply as commercial ignorance or a mistaken belief that the mill will fail. He also refuses to let Alexandra’s future be folded into the bargain. The discussion keeps exposing links between money, family authority and the treatment of people outside the room. At first he cannot fully name all his reasons and asks to postpone the argument. That unfinished account should not be replaced with Regina’s certainty that only jealousy or irrationality can explain his refusal.

A final speech alters the meaning of earlier participation

At the act’s end, Horace condemns exploitation while admitting that he has already done enough harm. The admission makes refusal a change of conduct rather than proof of lifelong innocence. His reference to dying also qualifies the ease with which he can now speak honestly. Regina’s death wish answers a decision she cannot immediately overcome; it does not itself stage a death in this act. The contrast tests whether refusing one harmful investment can remain a meaningful choice despite past complicity. A well-supported response can judge the limits of his resistance without deleting either the admission or the actual refusal.

Sources for this lesson

Pause and explain

Does Horace’s final refusal present him as someone who has never contributed to harm?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Revise “Horace refuses because he thinks the mill cannot make money”.

Show the worked solution
  1. He accepts the forecast of a large return.
  2. He questions the means and later names the harm.

Answer The conflict concerns what profit requires and what he will support, rather than only whether it is possible.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Connect the guarantees with the earlier toast.

Give me a hint

Ask what becomes specific beneath the promise of prosperity.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The earlier occasion celebrates a shared future.
  2. The later account identifies wages, power and control over workers.

The new detail tests the moral appearance of the earlier rhetoric.

Look for these in your work

  • Use two stages
  • Explain what changes
2 · Independent

Why does his acceptance of likely profit matter?

Give me a hint

Separate success from approval.

Compare my reasoning
  1. He believes the return may be large.
  2. He still refuses to invest.

The refusal challenges the assumption that a profitable opportunity supplies its own moral justification.

Look for these in your work

  • Retain the concession
  • Explain its significance
3 · Transfer

Qualify a claim about Horace’s honesty.

Give me a hint

Keep the admission and the change of action together.

Compare my reasoning
  1. He acknowledges previous harm.
  2. He rejects further participation.

The play offers compromised resistance rather than a person whose past guarantees moral authority.

Look for these in your work

  • Use counterevidence
  • Do not erase the refusal

Common mistakes

  • Do not give Regina’s explanation of his motive the authority of a stage fact.
  • Do not turn the death wish at the Act II curtain into the later collapse.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Does Horace’s final refusal present him as someone who has never contributed to harm?

Compare with the explanation

No; he says he has already done enough and will do no more.

The admission complicates his resistance instead of cancelling it.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Does Horace’s final refusal present him as someone who has never contributed to harm?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning World Literature

Course scope and assessment

238 original lessons provide 714 guided, independent and transfer tasks, plus 431 reading-tracker and long-response prompts. Twenty skill and route entries, three year-specific Cherry Orchard entries, two Anowa entries, three Crocodiles entries, one 2027 Little Foxes entry, two year-specific Volume 1 poetry entries, one historical 2025 Volume 2 poetry entry and three year-specific Volume 2 story entries link teaching. Anowa has ten lessons through the Prologue and all three phases, with thirty staged tasks and ten original developed responses. Complete primary reading locators support analysis of the contested community frame, partnership, enslavement, the children, remembered dream, separation and ending. The protected play is linked rather than reproduced; editorial BECE material is not reused. Both eligible 2025–2026 Anowa rows link the whole-play pathway. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters of In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, with eighty-four staged tasks and sixty original developed responses. Four workshops teach passage analysis, whole-book argument, layered voice and retrieval/revision. All three complete 2025–2027 book entries link the whole-book pathway; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. The public reflowed reading is linked rather than reproduced, with edition limits explicit. Twenty-two Little Foxes lessons teach all three acts for 2027, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed responses. Hospitality, silenced voices, the mill, financial negotiation, the proposed marriage, Horace’s return and refusal, the bonds, Birdie’s disclosure, withheld help, the final bargain and Alexandra’s decision are taught through actual stage directions and dialogue locators. Four workshops develop passage analysis, whole-play argument, stagecraft and corrective retrieval. SET-2027-2 links the full sequence; the existing supplemental route remains available without inflating counted requirements. The protected acting script is linked rather than reproduced; exact centre-edition wording and revisions must be checked. The Cherry Orchard has an 18-lesson whole-text sequence with five actual Julius West excerpts and three argument models. The 2026–2027 poetry option has teaching for all fourteen members, three complete public-domain poems and close-reading, comparison and retrieval workshops. Twenty-four lessons teach all ten 2026–2028 Stories of Ourselves Volume 2 members, with named reading and writing sequences and evidence, passage-context, essay and ten-member retrieval workshops. Two complete public-domain narratives, nineteen actual prose extracts and Katie’s complete twenty-line poem within Besant’s prose story support close reading and whole-story writing. The Shrinking Shoe follows the original 1895 prose and its five sections; the embedded poem is not a Paper 2 set poem. All three eligible ten-story selection rows link the complete pathway. Wodehouse and Woolf use brief quotations and original commentary with complete reading sources; their full texts are not reproduced here. Twelve lessons teach twelve compulsory 2028–2030 Volume 3 poems, with thirty-six staged tasks and twenty-four developed-response prompts. The Dutt and Kingsley excerpts and Cissoko’s exact translation still need verified reading and teaching; full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so all three complete poetry rows remain unlinked. Fourteen lessons teach seven 2029–2030 Volume 3 stories with thirty-five developed-response prompts. Twelve actual older primary excerpts support four stories; Achebe, Desai and Danticat use original commentary with complete primary reading links rather than reproducing their protected texts. A separate partial-member pathway supports The Necklace, The Model Millionaire, Sultana’s Dream, The Interlopers, The Sacrificial Egg, Sale and New York Day Women without linking either complete ten-story row. The three other members and full-selection workshops remain unfinished. Read the full centre-selected works and protected anthology; check edition differences, including Weissenhorn’s older Necklace translation. The historical 2025 poetry pathway teaches all fourteen members through eighteen lessons, fifty-four staged tasks and fifty-one developed-response models. Three complete public-domain poems remain printed with line breaks; eleven protected poems use complete primary reading links and original commentary. Four workshops teach close analysis, whole-poem argument, preparation comparisons and specific retrieval of all fourteen members. The complete SET-2025-5 option links this sequence; the historical supplemental route remains without increasing counted requirements. Archival Cambridge and WJEC papers supply primary poems, not reused questions or later-year assessment rules. Centre-edition differences remain explicit. Forty-six lessons provide original teaching and practice for nine historical 2025 story members: The Doll’s House, The Gold Watch, A Visit, A Walk to the Jetty, In the Mountains, Mrs. Sen’s, Promenade, The Plantation and The Paper Menagerie. Together they provide one hundred and thirty-eight staged tasks and one hundred and one developed-response models. A Visit uses complete primary reading visually checked across printed pages 306–310. Promenade follows the complete seven-page narrative on printed pages 416–422; its four lessons trace bodily control, wordless meetings, the interrupted circuit and changed final walk. Mrs. Sen’s has six lessons through the complete story, with eighteen staged tasks and thirteen developed-response models. Teaching follows the collection scan from its unnumbered opening through printed p.135, with food, letters, recordings, separate journeys and the changed final care arrangement. The Plantation has five lessons, fifteen staged tasks and eleven developed-response models through all four numbered sections, visually checked against printed pages 423–429 through the final dawn bird-call. In the Mountains has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the final invitation to eat. The complete publisher transcription supports scene-based reading; automated-text errors and subscription access remain explicit, and original printed pages were not visually verified. A Walk to the Jetty has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the complete six-page retype’s final berth. Reader annotations and the appended question are separate; the complete publisher version has wording differences, so exact quotations require the approved edition. The centre edition remains required for exact quotations. The protected stories are linked, not reproduced. The partial member pathway is supplemental; Words and full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so SET-2025-6 stays unlinked. Fifteen year-specific prescribed-work entries remain unfinished; complete centre-selected coursework reading also needs substantive text-specific teaching. The 51-entry map is a StudyForA preparation map, not official numbered syllabus sections or a percentage of student mastery. Written practice is self-checked and is not officially marked. Full timed papers and qualified literature-teacher assessment remain unfinished. Fictional exercises are labelled separately from actual excerpts; alternative well-supported readings can be valid. Centre-authenticated coursework and Cambridge moderation are separate from self-check practice.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.