Crocodiles · an argument across the whole journey
Build a qualified argument from separated parts of the book · Use counterevidence to develop rather than abandon an interpretation · Distinguish chapter arrival, settlement and narrative closure
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2025, 2026, 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for the 2025–2027 Paper 3 option In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, by Fabio Geda, translated by Howard Curtis. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters, with passage, whole-book essay, voice and retrieval workshops. All three complete 2025–2027 selected-work entries link this whole-book teaching pathway. Reading completion, qualified teacher assessment and calibrated full papers are not certified by these self-review exercises. Read the entire unabridged centre-selected book; lessons and models do not replace it. The public reader is a reflowed 133-page version; its page numbers are locators, not certified centre-edition pagination. Use your copy for exact wording, typography and paragraph breaks. The protected book is linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported readings can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. In 2025–2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This book is not a 2028–2030 Paper 3 option. It is excluded from 2025–2027 coursework because it is on those years’ Paper 3 lists; private candidates cannot enter 0408. The lessons analyse a narrative of past experience, not present-day travel, legal or personal-safety advice.
Before you begin
- Read the Author’s Note and the named chapter scenes in the centre’s complete Howard Curtis translation. Use the linked reader’s text version if needed; its page numbering differs from print editions.
- Distinguish the experiencing child, the later narrating Enaiat, Fabio’s conversational questions and the authorial/translation process. Reconstructed dialogue is not a certified recording.
- Read all six country chapters before the whole-book workshops. Teaching availability does not certify individual reading, mastery or an official assessment result.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Build a qualified argument from separated parts of the book
- Use counterevidence to develop rather than abandon an interpretation
- Distinguish chapter arrival, settlement and narrative closure
Crocodiles · three whole-book arguments
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected book or the linked public reading before answering. The protected book is not reproduced here.
- Reader page numbers identify this web version only. Use chapter and scene locators when working with another edition.
- Write your own developed response before opening the model. Use brief accurate evidence from your copy; paraphrase plainly when exact wording is uncertain.
Original whole-book teaching and self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated full paper. The lessons and models do not replace reading the complete centre-selected book or qualified assessment.
What does a home need?
Use Nava, an Iranian workplace, the Athens park and the Italian hostel/family sequence. Select precise scenes from the full book.
1. How does the book develop your understanding of what it means to find a home?
Compare after trying
Nava is remembered through valued ordinary life, so leaving is a loss even when staying is dangerous. Later shelter answers some needs but repeatedly fails to secure belonging: Baharestan feels familiar before expulsion, and the Athens park gives company without protection.
The hostel complicates an answer based only on food and warmth, because Enaiat needs study, contact and purposeful time. Family relationships create conditions for that future rather than a perfect place without difficulty. I read home as an attachment which needs safety and agency, not simply the last country on a route.
Why this response fits
- Develop a claim through different combinations of needs.
- Use the hostel as counterevidence to a purely material definition.
Survival and other people
Compare help, unequal bargains, deception and harm across at least three country chapters.
1. How does the narrative challenge a simple account of survival as individual strength?
Compare after trying
Enaiat makes decisions, resists some demands and works hard, but Hamid, contributing friends, the Greek woman and Payam provide resources he cannot create alone. The chain of contacts is as important as any solitary act of endurance.
Those relationships do not make the world or the protagonist innocent. Unequal labour, deceptive reassurance, the friends’ joke and his assault for water expose dependence under pressure. I find survival relational and morally difficult: strength matters, but it cannot account for the help, luck and costs which the book retains.
Why this response fits
- Keep agency and dependence together.
- Use contrary evidence to refine the argument instead of deleting it.
How much does the ending resolve?
Return to the opening, school desire and uncertain time, then read the hearing and phone call through the coda.
1. How far does the ending answer the needs and uncertainties established earlier?
Compare after trying
Schooling and asylum answer exclusion and the danger of being unable to remain, while the telephone contact returns to the mother’s absence at the opening. Shared breathing and crying make recognition possible where a neat explanatory speech would be inadequate.
The call is not a physical reunion, disturbed sleep has carried the journey into the new home, and the coda keeps age qualified even beside an administrative birthday. I find substantial resolution without total repair: the story can end while a life, relationships and some uncertainties continue.
Why this response fits
- Trace specific earlier needs into later developments.
- Name the remaining distances and uncertainties without denying real change.
Choose a question that needs more than one country
An argument about belonging should not merely list Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Greece and Italy. Select moments which test a developing idea. Nava has remembered value as well as danger; the samavat answers urgent needs under unequal terms; Baharestan briefly feels like home before expulsion. The Athens park offers companionship without security, while the Italian hostel supplies material care without the purposeful life Enaiat wants. These different combinations give an argument its shape. Countries are settings for changing conditions, not fixed moral characters which can be labelled wholly kind or cruel.
Use difficulty as evidence, not as an exception to hide
A claim that relationships make survival possible must answer the watch thief, violent transport and the friends’ joke as well as Hamid, the Greek woman, Payam and the family. It must also acknowledge the protagonist’s own deception and enacted violence. Qualification can make the central claim more exact: particular acts sustain a life inside unequal conditions, but neither friendship nor survival guarantees innocence. Organise paragraphs around such distinctions. Use a small number of well-chosen scenes in detail rather than many place names with no analysis.
Let an ending change an argument without closing every question
The phone call returns to the opening separation through sound, but does not physically reunite the family or erase the elapsed years. Asylum and schooling answer some earlier needs while disturbed sleep shows a continuing past. A conclusion should say what has changed and what has not. The whole-book model is a developed argument to compare after writing, not a paragraph bank to memorise. In closed-book preparation, practise accurate scene recall and brief checked wording; a centre or teacher must still assess the response. There is no automatic Cambridge grade for reaching the last lesson.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Geda · In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · Howard Curtis translation · public 133-page reading and text version
- Howard Curtis · first-person account of translating Geda’s book · English PEN
- In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · publisher’s edition and translator record · Penguin
Pause and explain
Which comparison can develop a whole-book argument about care most effectively?
Worked example
Develop “Italy is good and all earlier countries are bad”.
Show the worked solution
- Find kindness and attachment before Italy.
- Find restriction and uncertainty after arrival in Italy.
Answer The book tests belonging through conditions and relationships, which vary within places as well as between them.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Plan three paragraphs about belonging.
Give me a hint
Choose scenes that change rather than repeat the claim.
Compare my reasoning
- Begin with the value and danger of Nava.
- Test temporary homes against purposeful family life in Italy.
An argument can trace belonging from attachment, through conditional shelter, towards relationships that allow a future.
Look for these in your work
- Use separated scenes
- Explain development
Add counterevidence to a claim about friendship.
Give me a hint
Choose an action which does not fit an idealised rule.
Compare my reasoning
- Friends help fund travel and provide contacts.
- Friends also exploit a hope through the false clinic story.
Friendship remains important without becoming a guarantee that every act is protective.
Look for these in your work
- Retain both kinds of action
- Qualify the rule
Write a conclusion about the mother.
Give me a hint
Name a change and a remaining distance.
Compare my reasoning
- The opening makes her unavailable.
- The final call establishes mutual life without a physical meeting.
The ending reconnects what separation interrupted while refusing to pretend that time and distance have vanished.
Look for these in your work
- Connect the structure
- Keep the ending open
Common mistakes
- Do not make the narrator morally flawless by removing deception and the lorry assault.
- Do not describe the final phone call as a completed physical family reunion.
What can you explain now?
Which comparison can develop a whole-book argument about care most effectively?
Compare with the explanation
The samavat’s subsistence and the hostel’s material provision, each compared with what the child still needs.
The connection tests the meaning of care across different stages instead of treating each arrival as a complete solution.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Which comparison can develop a whole-book argument about care most effectively?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.