Crocodiles · shelter, gratitude and a child’s work at the samavat
Distinguish offered shelter from paid employment · Read kindness and dependence without simplifying either · Analyse rushed instructions, metaphor and a refusal
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2025, 2026, 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for the 2025–2027 Paper 3 option In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, by Fabio Geda, translated by Howard Curtis. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters, with passage, whole-book essay, voice and retrieval workshops. All three complete 2025–2027 selected-work entries link this whole-book teaching pathway. Reading completion, qualified teacher assessment and calibrated full papers are not certified by these self-review exercises. Read the entire unabridged centre-selected book; lessons and models do not replace it. The public reader is a reflowed 133-page version; its page numbers are locators, not certified centre-edition pagination. Use your copy for exact wording, typography and paragraph breaks. The protected book is linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported readings can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. In 2025–2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This book is not a 2028–2030 Paper 3 option. It is excluded from 2025–2027 coursework because it is on those years’ Paper 3 lists; private candidates cannot enter 0408. The lessons analyse a narrative of past experience, not present-day travel, legal or personal-safety advice.
Before you begin
- Read the Author’s Note and the named chapter scenes in the centre’s complete Howard Curtis translation. Use the linked reader’s text version if needed; its page numbering differs from print editions.
- Distinguish the experiencing child, the later narrating Enaiat, Fabio’s conversational questions and the authorial/translation process. Reconstructed dialogue is not a certified recording.
- Read all six country chapters before the whole-book workshops. Teaching availability does not certify individual reading, mastery or an official assessment result.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Distinguish offered shelter from paid employment
- Read kindness and dependence without simplifying either
- Analyse rushed instructions, metaphor and a refusal
Crocodiles · an offer, a working day and a boundary
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected book or the linked public reading before answering. The protected book is not reproduced here.
- Reader page numbers identify this web version only. Use chapter and scene locators when working with another edition.
- Write your own developed response before opening the model. Use brief accurate evidence from your copy; paraphrase plainly when exact wording is uncertain.
Original whole-book teaching and self-review, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated full paper. The lessons and models do not replace reading the complete centre-selected book or qualified assessment.
A welcome that has conditions
Read the approach to Rahim and the revised offer, reader pp.21–23.
1. How does the account make gratitude coexist with an unequal arrangement?
Compare after trying
The child approaches Rahim because he can communicate with him and fears the unknown street. The changed offer therefore produces credible relief. Yet its terms exchange an entire working day for subsistence rather than money.
The later list of difficulties keeps relief from becoming a claim that everything is now fine. I read the gratitude as a response to an urgent need, not as proof that the child has equal bargaining power or that the reader should stop questioning the conditions.
Why this response fits
- Explain the actual terms of the offer.
- Keep immediate relief distinct from a judgement that all conditions are fair.
The limit of a refusal
Read the crowded calls, sewer task and Zaman’s introduction, reader pp.24–25.
1. How does the sewer episode present agency within continuing dependence?
Compare after trying
The repeated calls place Enaiat under competing demands, but his refusal introduces a boundary which Rahim’s appeal to gratitude does not overcome. His answer uses his physical smallness to challenge the claim that they face the same task on the same terms.
Other men provide the help, while Enaiat’s later avoidance shows that the workplace relationship is not simply reset as equal. The episode makes an act of resistance visible without offering a general promise of safety or ending his reliance on the samavat.
Why this response fits
- Use the dialogue’s argument and the actual outcome.
- Do not convert a limited refusal into complete freedom.
A mixed offer answers an immediate need
In the Pakistan chapter, unfamiliar accents make even hoped-for communication difficult. Rahim first limits assistance to a day, then changes the offer to food and a place to sleep in exchange for work, without wages. The relief is real because the child fears the street. That relief does not make the arrangement equal or every condition fair. A close response should retain both the help and the dependence, rather than classify Rahim instantly as either an entirely generous rescuer or someone incapable of any useful kindness.
The telling makes pressure felt in its rhythm
The exhausting first day is arranged through accumulating reasons, while repeated calls and overlapping demands later make the reader follow a body sent from task to task. Familiar food and farming comparisons render exhaustion through the child’s own stock of images. Those comparisons can be lively without making the labour harmless. The difference between being instructed and being taught how to do something also matters: expectations arrive before the knowledge needed to meet them. Analyse how the form of a passage recreates pressure, not only how much work the child says he does.
A refusal complicates absolute helplessness
During the blocked-sewer episode, Enaiat refuses to enter the sewage and answers Rahim’s argument by emphasising his smallness. Other men eventually help, and the child keeps out of Rahim’s way afterwards. The refusal is a limited act within dependence, not proof of secure freedom or a general guarantee that an exploited child can simply say no. Zaman’s advice and the gradual trust attached to deliveries also show that the workplace contains different relationships. Track those distinctions without converting survival competence into approval of the conditions that demand it.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Geda · In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · Howard Curtis translation · public 133-page reading and text version
- Howard Curtis · first-person account of translating Geda’s book · English PEN
- In the Sea There Are Crocodiles · publisher’s edition and translator record · Penguin
Pause and explain
Does Rahim’s continuing arrangement pay Enaiat a wage at the samavat?
Worked example
Improve “Rahim immediately gives the child a well-paid permanent job”.
Show the worked solution
- Follow the initial one-day offer and later change.
- Retain the explicit exchange of labour for food and sleeping space without wages.
Answer The arrangement gives immediate relief while keeping the child dependent and unpaid.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Why can the revised offer be both welcome and unequal?
Give me a hint
Keep the street fear beside the lack of wages.
Compare my reasoning
- It meets an urgent need for shelter and food.
- It requires extensive work without independent earnings.
The same offer can help materially while limiting the child’s choices.
Look for these in your work
- Hold both facts
- Avoid an absolute moral label
How do repeated calls recreate the working day?
Give me a hint
Consider the reader’s movement between demands.
Compare my reasoning
- Tasks and speakers overlap.
- The child must respond before finishing or understanding everything.
The passage’s pressured rhythm makes dependence bodily and immediate.
Look for these in your work
- Analyse the arrangement
- Connect rhythm with experience
Qualify a claim that the sewer refusal ends exploitation.
Give me a hint
Follow what changes and what remains.
Compare my reasoning
- He avoids one particular task.
- His dependence on the sleeping place and other work continues.
A limited assertion of agency does not resolve the larger conditions.
Look for these in your work
- Identify the actual outcome
- Keep the scale proportionate
Common mistakes
- Do not make gratitude proof that every condition is freely chosen or fair.
- Do not turn one successful refusal into a universal rule about safety.
What can you explain now?
Does Rahim’s continuing arrangement pay Enaiat a wage at the samavat?
Compare with the explanation
No; the child receives food and sleeping space in exchange for work, not money.
The later discussion with the shopkeeper depends on keeping this distinction accurate.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Does Rahim’s continuing arrangement pay Enaiat a wage at the samavat?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.