Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0408

Little Foxes · medicine, stillness and the staircase

Trace the crisis through the precise written actions · Distinguish the audience’s view from Alexandra’s later question · Compare practical care with demands which interrupt it

Cambridge IGCSE World Literature 0408 · 2027-P3-FOXES / 2025-P3-A / 2025-P3-B
Exam scope and assessment notes

0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes, listed as Little Foxes in Cambridge’s 2027 Paper 3 selection. Twenty-two lessons teach all three acts of Little Foxes and four whole-play workshops, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed-response models. The complete SET-2027-2 option links this teaching for 2027; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. Complete primary reading, qualified teacher review and full timed calibration remain separate requirements. Read the complete unabridged centre-selected script. The linked public scan is a Dramatists Play Service acting edition with printed pages through 79; reader scan numbers and printed page numbers differ. Check exact wording, revisions, blocking and punctuation against the centre edition. The protected play and its page images are linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. For 2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This play is not a prescribed 2025 or 2026 Paper 3 option, nor a 2028–2030 Paper 3 prose option. It is excluded from 2027 coursework because it is on that year’s Paper 3 list; private candidates cannot enter 0408. Analyse the play’s racism, unequal relationships and domestic violence critically rather than adopting a character’s claims as the author’s or a general truth.

Before you begin

  • Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected script; read all three acts before attempting the whole-play workshops. Reader scans are two-page views; printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition.
  • Distinguish stage directions, observable action, a character’s claim and an inference about intention. A performance can realise the written directions in different ways.
  • The teaching sequence does not prove individual mastery. Read the complete play, write your own responses and seek qualified literature-teacher feedback; full timed calibration remains unfinished.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What should support a claim about a literary text?

What you will learn

  • Trace the crisis through the precise written actions
  • Distinguish the audience’s view from Alexandra’s later question
  • Compare practical care with demands which interrupt it

Little Foxes · the sequence the audience sees

  • Read the named scenes in the complete script before answering. The protected play is not reproduced here.
  • Printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition. Use the act and scene event when your centre edition differs.
  • Write a developed answer before opening the original model. Use brief checked wording from your copy and explain the effect of dialogue, movement or timing.

Original self-review for whole-play preparation, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated paper. These lessons do not replace the complete play, the learner’s own writing or qualified assessment; they do not certify individual mastery.

Help withheld

Read from Horace reaching for the bottle through Regina summoning help, printed p.66.

  1. 1. How does the staging make Regina’s lack of movement dramatically disturbing?

    Compare after trying

    The bottle slips from Horace’s shaking fingers before he asks her to tell Addie about the other one. The insistence that she remains still places the absence of help directly beside a request which she has heard. His weak call then makes the consequence of that silence bodily and immediate.

    The desperate movement up the stairs contrasts with her continuing stillness and refusal to turn. His collapse is out of view, and she waits before calling the others. I would judge the sequence through that sustained withholding rather than invent poison or a push which the stage directions do not supply.

    Why this response fits

    • Follow request, stillness, effort and delay in order.
    • Interpret the exact action rather than substituting a different event.

Different knowledge after the crisis

Read Alexandra’s return, Leo’s arrival and the attempts to fetch the doctor, printed pp.66–70.

  1. 1. How does the aftermath distinguish the audience’s knowledge from the characters’?

    Compare after trying

    Alexandra returns to an empty wheelchair and Addie’s urgent instruction to go upstairs, so she encounters evidence of a crisis after its decisive exchange. Leo is preoccupied with the bank, while Cal’s refusal to be detained makes practical care visible beside another demand.

    The audience can connect these responses with the earlier request and Regina’s stillness, but the arriving characters have not watched them. The later staircase question can therefore suggest suspicion without becoming eyewitness proof. I would preserve that difference instead of supplying an onstage doctor’s verdict or making everyone immediately know the same facts.

    Why this response fits

    • Locate each arrival after the decisive sequence.
    • Keep suspicion, observation and medical certainty separate.

Stillness becomes an action the audience must judge

During the painful conversation, Horace reaches for his medicine, loses the bottle from shaking fingers and asks Regina to tell Addie about the other bottle upstairs. The direction insists that Regina has not moved and does not move now. The sequence gives the request, her continued stillness and his recognition a clear relationship in time. It does not show Regina poisoning him, throwing the bottle or pushing him. Describe the refusal of help precisely before interpreting intention or responsibility. The frightening effect depends on what is withheld in a room where another person urgently needs a response.

The visible effort ends beyond the audience’s sight

His call is too weak to be heard outside. He forces himself towards the stairs, slips, catches the rail and reaches the landing before collapsing out of view. Regina has not turned during the climb; after waiting, she calls him and then summons Addie and Cal. The audience has seen more of the sequence than those arriving to help, but even its view has a spatial boundary. Alexandra returns from accompanying Birdie only afterwards and sees the empty wheelchair. Her later question about the staircase is therefore an inference from circumstances, not testimony from having watched the refusal.

The aftermath tests what each interruption asks for

Addie and Cal run to help, while Alexandra goes upstairs and arrangements are made to fetch the doctor. Leo arrives agitated about the bank and demands answers from Cal, who breaks his hold because practical care is urgent. That contrast recalls earlier differences between service and commands. Do not invent a doctor’s onstage diagnosis, an observed cause of death beyond the written sequence, or immediate complete knowledge for Ben. The scene distributes action and knowledge unevenly. A strong response can judge the deliberate stillness while being exact about the limits of the stage, witnesses and later reports.

Sources for this lesson

Pause and explain

What does Alexandra directly see when she returns after walking Birdie home?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Correct “Alexandra watches Regina push Horace downstairs”.

Show the worked solution
  1. No pushing is staged.
  2. Horace climbs and collapses out of view before Alexandra returns.

Answer The invented action and invented witness both distort the actual dramatic method.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Explain the effect of the repeated stillness direction.

Give me a hint

Place it immediately after the request.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Horace asks for help in reaching the other medicine.
  2. The direction explicitly sustains Regina’s lack of movement.

The withheld response becomes visible through its timing and contrast with urgent need.

Look for these in your work

  • Use the order
  • Interpret the absence of movement
2 · Independent

Where does the audience’s view end?

Give me a hint

Trace the climb rather than inventing a fall down the stairs.

Compare my reasoning
  1. He struggles towards the landing.
  2. He collapses there out of view.

The effort is visible but the final position has a spatial limit which should remain in the analysis.

Look for these in your work

  • Give the correct direction of travel
  • Retain the visibility limit
3 · Transfer

How does Cal’s response to Leo continue the care theme?

Give me a hint

Compare the demand for answers with his current task.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Leo tries to detain him.
  2. Cal breaks away to attend to urgent needs.

Practical care takes precedence over a privileged visitor’s demand for immediate service.

Look for these in your work

  • Use the interruption
  • Connect action with priority

Common mistakes

  • Do not substitute poisoning, pushing or a deliberately thrown bottle for the written actions.
  • Do not make an offstage collapse into an onstage medical verdict.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does Alexandra directly see when she returns after walking Birdie home?

Compare with the explanation

She sees the empty wheelchair after the crisis, rather than witnessing Regina’s refusal to move.

Her later question is powerful without giving her the audience’s earlier view.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

What does Alexandra directly see when she returns after walking Birdie home?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning World Literature

Course scope and assessment

238 original lessons provide 714 guided, independent and transfer tasks, plus 431 reading-tracker and long-response prompts. Twenty skill and route entries, three year-specific Cherry Orchard entries, two Anowa entries, three Crocodiles entries, one 2027 Little Foxes entry, two year-specific Volume 1 poetry entries, one historical 2025 Volume 2 poetry entry and three year-specific Volume 2 story entries link teaching. Anowa has ten lessons through the Prologue and all three phases, with thirty staged tasks and ten original developed responses. Complete primary reading locators support analysis of the contested community frame, partnership, enslavement, the children, remembered dream, separation and ending. The protected play is linked rather than reproduced; editorial BECE material is not reused. Both eligible 2025–2026 Anowa rows link the whole-play pathway. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters of In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, with eighty-four staged tasks and sixty original developed responses. Four workshops teach passage analysis, whole-book argument, layered voice and retrieval/revision. All three complete 2025–2027 book entries link the whole-book pathway; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. The public reflowed reading is linked rather than reproduced, with edition limits explicit. Twenty-two Little Foxes lessons teach all three acts for 2027, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed responses. Hospitality, silenced voices, the mill, financial negotiation, the proposed marriage, Horace’s return and refusal, the bonds, Birdie’s disclosure, withheld help, the final bargain and Alexandra’s decision are taught through actual stage directions and dialogue locators. Four workshops develop passage analysis, whole-play argument, stagecraft and corrective retrieval. SET-2027-2 links the full sequence; the existing supplemental route remains available without inflating counted requirements. The protected acting script is linked rather than reproduced; exact centre-edition wording and revisions must be checked. The Cherry Orchard has an 18-lesson whole-text sequence with five actual Julius West excerpts and three argument models. The 2026–2027 poetry option has teaching for all fourteen members, three complete public-domain poems and close-reading, comparison and retrieval workshops. Twenty-four lessons teach all ten 2026–2028 Stories of Ourselves Volume 2 members, with named reading and writing sequences and evidence, passage-context, essay and ten-member retrieval workshops. Two complete public-domain narratives, nineteen actual prose extracts and Katie’s complete twenty-line poem within Besant’s prose story support close reading and whole-story writing. The Shrinking Shoe follows the original 1895 prose and its five sections; the embedded poem is not a Paper 2 set poem. All three eligible ten-story selection rows link the complete pathway. Wodehouse and Woolf use brief quotations and original commentary with complete reading sources; their full texts are not reproduced here. Twelve lessons teach twelve compulsory 2028–2030 Volume 3 poems, with thirty-six staged tasks and twenty-four developed-response prompts. The Dutt and Kingsley excerpts and Cissoko’s exact translation still need verified reading and teaching; full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so all three complete poetry rows remain unlinked. Fourteen lessons teach seven 2029–2030 Volume 3 stories with thirty-five developed-response prompts. Twelve actual older primary excerpts support four stories; Achebe, Desai and Danticat use original commentary with complete primary reading links rather than reproducing their protected texts. A separate partial-member pathway supports The Necklace, The Model Millionaire, Sultana’s Dream, The Interlopers, The Sacrificial Egg, Sale and New York Day Women without linking either complete ten-story row. The three other members and full-selection workshops remain unfinished. Read the full centre-selected works and protected anthology; check edition differences, including Weissenhorn’s older Necklace translation. The historical 2025 poetry pathway teaches all fourteen members through eighteen lessons, fifty-four staged tasks and fifty-one developed-response models. Three complete public-domain poems remain printed with line breaks; eleven protected poems use complete primary reading links and original commentary. Four workshops teach close analysis, whole-poem argument, preparation comparisons and specific retrieval of all fourteen members. The complete SET-2025-5 option links this sequence; the historical supplemental route remains without increasing counted requirements. Archival Cambridge and WJEC papers supply primary poems, not reused questions or later-year assessment rules. Centre-edition differences remain explicit. Forty-six lessons provide original teaching and practice for nine historical 2025 story members: The Doll’s House, The Gold Watch, A Visit, A Walk to the Jetty, In the Mountains, Mrs. Sen’s, Promenade, The Plantation and The Paper Menagerie. Together they provide one hundred and thirty-eight staged tasks and one hundred and one developed-response models. A Visit uses complete primary reading visually checked across printed pages 306–310. Promenade follows the complete seven-page narrative on printed pages 416–422; its four lessons trace bodily control, wordless meetings, the interrupted circuit and changed final walk. Mrs. Sen’s has six lessons through the complete story, with eighteen staged tasks and thirteen developed-response models. Teaching follows the collection scan from its unnumbered opening through printed p.135, with food, letters, recordings, separate journeys and the changed final care arrangement. The Plantation has five lessons, fifteen staged tasks and eleven developed-response models through all four numbered sections, visually checked against printed pages 423–429 through the final dawn bird-call. In the Mountains has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the final invitation to eat. The complete publisher transcription supports scene-based reading; automated-text errors and subscription access remain explicit, and original printed pages were not visually verified. A Walk to the Jetty has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the complete six-page retype’s final berth. Reader annotations and the appended question are separate; the complete publisher version has wording differences, so exact quotations require the approved edition. The centre edition remains required for exact quotations. The protected stories are linked, not reproduced. The partial member pathway is supplemental; Words and full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so SET-2025-6 stays unlinked. Fifteen year-specific prescribed-work entries remain unfinished; complete centre-selected coursework reading also needs substantive text-specific teaching. The 51-entry map is a StudyForA preparation map, not official numbered syllabus sections or a percentage of student mastery. Written practice is self-checked and is not officially marked. Full timed papers and qualified literature-teacher assessment remain unfinished. Fictional exercises are labelled separately from actual excerpts; alternative well-supported readings can be valid. Centre-authenticated coursework and Cambridge moderation are separate from self-check practice.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.