Little Foxes · missing bonds and an unfinished new will
Trace how information moves from the bank into the room · Distinguish the earlier unauthorised use from the later proposed cover story · Analyse the effect of an inheritance plan on Regina’s choices
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2027. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching for Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes, listed as Little Foxes in Cambridge’s 2027 Paper 3 selection. Twenty-two lessons teach all three acts of Little Foxes and four whole-play workshops, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed-response models. The complete SET-2027-2 option links this teaching for 2027; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. Complete primary reading, qualified teacher review and full timed calibration remain separate requirements. Read the complete unabridged centre-selected script. The linked public scan is a Dramatists Play Service acting edition with printed pages through 79; reader scan numbers and printed page numbers differ. Check exact wording, revisions, blocking and punctuation against the centre edition. The protected play and its page images are linked, not reproduced here. Questions and models are original self-review and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other well-supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. For 2027, Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each. This play is not a prescribed 2025 or 2026 Paper 3 option, nor a 2028–2030 Paper 3 prose option. It is excluded from 2027 coursework because it is on that year’s Paper 3 list; private candidates cannot enter 0408. Analyse the play’s racism, unequal relationships and domestic violence critically rather than adopting a character’s claims as the author’s or a general truth.
Before you begin
- Read the named scenes in the complete centre-selected script; read all three acts before attempting the whole-play workshops. Reader scans are two-page views; printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition.
- Distinguish stage directions, observable action, a character’s claim and an inference about intention. A performance can realise the written directions in different ways.
- The teaching sequence does not prove individual mastery. Read the complete play, write your own responses and seek qualified literature-teacher feedback; full timed calibration remains unfinished.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Trace how information moves from the bank into the room
- Distinguish the earlier unauthorised use from the later proposed cover story
- Analyse the effect of an inheritance plan on Regina’s choices
Little Foxes · who controls the account?
- Read the named scenes in the complete script before answering. The protected play is not reproduced here.
- Printed page locators refer to the linked acting edition. Use the act and scene event when your centre edition differs.
- Write a developed answer before opening the original model. Use brief checked wording from your copy and explain the effect of dialogue, movement or timing.
Original self-review for whole-play preparation, not official Cambridge questions, marks, coursework or a calibrated paper. These lessons do not replace the complete play, the learner’s own writing or qualified assessment; they do not certify individual mastery.
The message and the box
Read Horace’s instruction to Cal, the report from the bank and the disclosure, printed pp.57, 62–64.
1. How does the sequence make information an instrument of pressure?
Compare after trying
Horace’s insistence that the thanks and the lawyer’s visit be announced publicly makes an apparently courteous message reach the people most troubled by the box. Cal’s report of Leo’s reaction lets the audience see the effect without returning the stage to the bank.
Horace then reveals that he has known about the missing bonds for several days. The audience can place this beside the earlier scheme, but his account still reconstructs actions he did not witness. I find the pressure strongest in the different meanings the same message carries for its listeners.
Why this response fits
- Connect the instruction with its reported effect.
- Distinguish reconstruction from eyewitness action.
An intended inheritance
Read the proposed loan, new will and marriage recollection, printed pp.64–65.
1. How does the proposed will change the struggle between Horace and Regina?
Compare after trying
By assigning her the bonds and proposing to describe their use as a loan, Horace attempts to tie Regina’s hands while directing the remainder towards Alexandra. The plan turns knowledge of wrongdoing into control over what she can gain from disclosing it.
Regina’s account of being left out of her father’s money makes this restriction part of a longer struggle over access to wealth. Her repetition of the assurance about Horace’s lifetime gives the future tense a darker force. The will remains intended, so I would analyse the pressure of the plan without claiming its execution has been shown.
Why this response fits
- Explain how the intended arrangement changes leverage.
- Keep contextual explanation distinct from excuse and completion.
The audience knows more than a messenger is told
Horace asks Cal to thank Mander publicly for bringing the deposit box and to announce the expected visit with Sol Fowler. Cal notices the odd instruction, and his return reports Leo’s agitation at the bank. The message works through an uneven distribution of knowledge: a public courtesy becomes pressure on someone who knows what is missing. Horace later says that he discovered the absence three days earlier. The audience can connect his account with the earlier scheme, but he did not personally witness every stage of the removal and delivery. Keep his reconstruction distinct from what the play previously disclosed.
A loan is now a proposed story with a different purpose
Horace tells Regina that he will let the bonds remain as a loan from her and will say that he lent them. That proposed account does not make the original use authorised: Act II established access without his consent. It instead removes the leverage Regina expects to gain from exposing her brothers. The repetition of the loan description therefore changes its speaker and immediate purpose while preserving the earlier wrongdoing. Financial vocabulary can conceal coercion in more than one direction; the scene need not make Horace’s punitive control an uncomplicated form of justice.
The future tense becomes a source of pressure
Horace plans a new will leaving Regina the eighty-eight thousand dollars in bonds and Alexandra the rest. He does not execute that will on stage. Regina’s repetition of the assurance lasting while he lives makes his limited future newly significant before the crisis. Her account of the father who left his money to Ben and Oscar explains an old exclusion from power and the marriage she pursued instead. Explanation does not excuse the harm that follows. Analyse the changing value of the same words and the painful marriage history without claiming that a proposed document has already made a legally verified transfer.
Sources for this lesson
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2025–2027 · Version 2
- Cambridge 0408 · revised 2025–2027 component weightings
- Cambridge World Literature 0408 · 2028–2030 · Version 1
- Hellman · The Little Foxes · public Dramatists Play Service scan, 40 two-page reader views
- The Little Foxes · playwright and script record · Concord Theatricals
Pause and explain
Does the proposed loan account prove Horace agreed to the original use of the bonds?
Worked example
Repair “The new will proves Alexandra has already received everything”.
Show the worked solution
- Horace describes what he intends to arrange.
- The lawyer’s expected visit and completed execution are different events.
Answer The scene creates a future plan whose completion remains unshown.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
How does Cal’s message create pressure?
Give me a hint
Follow the listeners rather than the polite form alone.
Compare my reasoning
- Cal thanks Mander and announces the lawyer publicly.
- Leo reacts because he knows about the missing bonds.
An apparently ordinary message becomes alarming through knowledge unevenly shared.
Look for these in your work
- Trace the information
- Explain the different response
Compare the two uses of the loan description.
Give me a hint
Identify the speaker, timing and purpose.
Compare my reasoning
- Oscar uses it to justify unauthorised access.
- Horace proposes it to prevent Regina exploiting the discovery.
The repeated label changes its tactical use without changing the earlier absence of consent.
Look for these in your work
- Use the chronology
- Keep the wrongdoing explicit
Why repeat the assurance about Horace’s lifetime?
Give me a hint
Read it beside his illness and the intended will.
Compare my reasoning
- His promise restrains Regina while he can maintain the account.
- She repeats the duration before the crisis.
The repeated words acquire a threatening implication without becoming an external medical or legal verdict.
Look for these in your work
- Use the changed emphasis
- Avoid inventing a completed will
Common mistakes
- Do not confuse Horace’s reconstruction with his eyewitness knowledge.
- Do not treat a character’s financial or legal plan as a verified completed transaction.
What can you explain now?
Does the proposed loan account prove Horace agreed to the original use of the bonds?
Compare with the explanation
No; it is a later cover story proposed after he discovers their absence.
Changing the account afterwards does not supply the consent absent from the earlier scheme.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Does the proposed loan account prove Horace agreed to the original use of the bonds?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.