The Interlopers · inherited hatred, changed intentions and approaching wolves
Distinguish the court’s ruling from the characters’ hostile claims · Trace the tree fall, threatened revenge and developing friendship · Explain the final correction of hoped-for rescue without inventing an aftermath
Exam scope and assessment notes
0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2029, 2030. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA reading and writing practice for the 2029–2030 Stories of Ourselves Volume 3 prose option. Teaching and practice are available for 7 of the ten prescribed stories. The remaining 3 members and full-selection workshops need substantive teaching. Both complete 2029 and 2030 selection entries remain content gaps. Prepare all ten members if your centre selects this anthology option; not every prose alternative is compulsory. The pathway links complete primary readings and prints selected older public-domain excerpts. Achebe’s, Desai’s and Danticat’s protected stories are not reproduced; use the linked reading and centre anthology beside the original commentary and tasks. These are not Cambridge examination passages or a reproduction of the protected anthology. Translation, spelling, punctuation and paragraph layout may differ from the prescribed edition. Bracketed block counters are navigation aids, not original line numbers. Models illustrate supported arguments and do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Alternative supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified literature-teacher review and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. This is not the different 2025 or 2026–2028 Volume 2 selection. Revised coursework requires complete drama works, not these stories. Paper 3 is closed book: 90 minutes, one extract response and one whole-text essay, 25 marks each.
Before you begin
- Confirm your examination year is 2029 or 2030 and your centre has selected the complete ten-story Volume 3 option. Read the complete story in the centre’s anthology before analysing an extract. Private candidates cannot enter 0408.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
What should support a claim about a literary text?
What you will learn
- Distinguish the court’s ruling from the characters’ hostile claims
- Trace the tree fall, threatened revenge and developing friendship
- Explain the final correction of hoped-for rescue without inventing an aftermath
The Interlopers · actual passages and changing expectations
- Read the complete story. For passage work, locate the specified scene in your centre’s anthology and connect it with earlier and later events.
- Write before opening the model. Explain the effect of precise evidence on the question.
- Bracketed block counters are StudyForA aids. Use your centre’s anthology for exact wording, translation and paragraph layout.
Original self-review practice, not official Cambridge questions, marked scripts, coursework or calibrated full timed papers. The linked reading edition is not certified identical to the prescribed anthology. Prepare all ten stories if selecting this option; models are not the only valid interpretations.
A meeting, a tree and a changed proposal
The first extract follows Ulrich’s patrol; the second occurs after the trapped men have exchanged threats and Georg has refused the wine. Read the intervening events in the complete story.
Saki · meeting and the falling tree
[1] He strayed away by himself from the watchers whom he had placed in ambush on the crest of the hill, and wandered far down the steep slopes amid the wild tangle of undergrowth, peering through the tree trunks and listening through the whistling and skirling of the wind and the restless beating of the branches for sight and sound of the marauders. If only on this wild night, in this dark, lone spot, he might come across Georg Znaeym, man to man, with none to witness—that was the wish that was uppermost in his thoughts. And as he stepped round the trunk of a huge beech he came face to face with the man he sought.
[2] The two enemies stood glaring at one another for a long silent moment. Each had a rifle in his hand, each had hate in his heart and murder uppermost in his mind. The chance had come to give full play to the passions of a lifetime. But a man who has been brought up under the code of a restraining civilisation cannot easily nerve himself to shoot down his neighbour in cold blood and without word spoken, except for an offence against his hearth and honour. And before the moment of hesitation had given way to action a deed of Nature’s own violence overwhelmed them both. A fierce shriek of the storm had been answered by a splitting crash over their heads, and ere they could leap aside a mass of falling beech tree had thundered down on them. Ulrich von Gradwitz found himself stretched on the ground, one arm numb beneath him and the other held almost as helplessly in a tight tangle of forked branches, while both legs were pinned beneath the fallen mass. His heavy shooting-boots had saved his feet from being crushed to pieces, but if his fractures were not as serious as they might have been, at least it was evident that he could not move from his present position till some one came to release him. The descending twig had slashed the skin of his face, and he had to wink away some drops of blood from his eyelashes before he could take in a general view of the disaster. At his side, so near that under ordinary circumstances he could almost have touched him, lay Georg Znaeym, alive and struggling, but obviously as helplessly pinioned down as himself. All round them lay a thick-strewn wreckage of splintered branches and broken twigs.
Saki · a change of mind and its imagined future
[1] Ulrich was silent for a few minutes, and lay listening to the weary screeching of the wind. An idea was slowly forming and growing in his brain, an idea that gained strength every time that he looked across at the man who was fighting so grimly against pain and exhaustion. In the pain and languor that Ulrich himself was feeling the old fierce hatred seemed to be dying down.
[2] “Neighbour,” he said presently, “do as you please if your men come first. It was a fair compact. But as for me, I’ve changed my mind. If my men are the first to come you shall be the first to be helped, as though you were my guest. We have quarrelled like devils all our lives over this stupid strip of forest, where the trees can’t even stand upright in a breath of wind. Lying here to-night thinking I’ve come to think we’ve been rather fools; there are better things in life than getting the better of a boundary dispute. Neighbour, if you will help me to bury the old quarrel I—I will ask you to be my friend.”
[3] Georg Znaeym was silent for so long that Ulrich thought, perhaps, he had fainted with the pain of his injuries. Then he spoke slowly and in jerks.
[4] “How the whole region would stare and gabble if we rode into the market-square together. No one living can remember seeing a Znaeym and a von Gradwitz talking to one another in friendship. And what peace there would be among the forester folk if we ended our feud to-night. And if we choose to make peace among our people there is none other to interfere, no interlopers from outside . . . You would come and keep the Sylvester night beneath my roof, and I would come and feast on some high day at your castle . . . I would never fire a shot on your land, save when you invited me as a guest; and you should come and shoot with me down in the marshes where the wildfowl are. In all the countryside there are none that could hinder if we willed to make peace. I never thought to have wanted to do other than hate you all my life, but I think I have changed my mind about things too, this last half-hour. And you offered me your wine-flask . . . Ulrich von Gradwitz, I will be your friend.”
[5] For a space both men were silent, turning over in their minds the wonderful changes that this dramatic reconciliation would bring about. In the cold, gloomy forest, with the wind tearing in fitful gusts through the naked branches and whistling round the tree-trunks, they lay and waited for the help that would now bring release and succour to both parties. And each prayed a private prayer that his men might be the first to arrive, so that he might be the first to show honourable attention to the enemy that had become a friend.
1. How does Saki make the change from hatred to friendship convincing within the scene?
Compare after trying
The meeting gives both men their wished-for opportunity, but hesitation and the falling tree replace that apparent power with bodily helplessness. Their later threats initially preserve the quarrel even in captivity, so the storm does not mechanically make them kind.
The friendship passage then shows thought and attention to shared pain. Ulrich’s promise to help Georg first alters the competition, and Georg’s long pause leads to a detailed imagined future of visits and public peace. I find the change persuasive because it develops through response and specific commitments, while recognising that the future they describe has not yet occurred.
Why this response fits
- Place the extracts within the continuing threats and refused wine.
- Explain the developing intention without inventing a shared drink or accomplished public reconciliation.
The figures that appear to be help
This is the complete final approach and identification after the new friends have called together.
Saki · hoped-for help and the last word
[1] There was silence again for some minutes, and then Ulrich gave a joyful cry.
[2] “I can see figures coming through the wood. They are following in the way I came down the hillside.”
[3] Both men raised their voices in as loud a shout as they could muster.
[4] “They hear us! They’ve stopped. Now they see us. They’re running down the hill towards us,” cried Ulrich.
[5] “How many of them are there?” asked Georg.
[6] “I can’t see distinctly,” said Ulrich; “nine or ten,”
[7] “Then they are yours,” said Georg; “I had only seven out with me.”
[8] “They are making all the speed they can, brave lads,” said Ulrich gladly.
[9] “Are they your men?” asked Georg. “Are they your men?” he repeated impatiently as Ulrich did not answer.
[10] “No,” said Ulrich with a laugh, the idiotic chattering laugh of a man unstrung with hideous fear.
[11] “Who are they?” asked Georg quickly, straining his eyes to see what the other would gladly not have seen.
[12] “Wolves.”
1. How does the ending turn relief into fear?
Compare after trying
The approach is first interpreted through hopeful speech and a rough count. Because Georg’s party is smaller, the figures seem to belong to Ulrich, and their movement is praised as brave assistance. That interpretation gives the reader a temporary position beside the men’s relief.
Repeated questions, the absent answer and the altered laugh then interrupt the certainty. The single final identification of wolves sharply revises the meaning of the same movement. The ending creates severe danger by correcting knowledge, rather than by describing a completed attack. Its brevity leaves the expected rescue overturned at the point of recognition.
Why this response fits
- Trace the actual changes in speech, inference and response.
- Explain the force of the final word without adding a narrated death or escape.
A human enemy is introduced as quarry
Ulrich patrols a narrow disputed woodland on a winter night. The opening initially suggests a hunter waiting for an animal, then reveals a human target. A court ruling had awarded the strip to his family in his grandfather’s time, but Georg’s family never accepted it; personal hatred sustains an inherited quarrel. Georg’s description of a stolen forest is a partisan claim, not the court’s finding. The narrator also notes that the strip is not especially valuable for game, making the intensity of the rivalry striking beside what is contested.
The opportunity for murder becomes shared helplessness
The men meet with rifles, hatred and intentions of killing. The account gives a moment of hesitation under a code of civilisation before the storm breaks a beech over them. Neither has fired before the fall. Both are alive but pinned, and each threatens to have his own followers kill the other when help arrives. Their confident calculations coexist with uncertainty about whose men will find them first. Nature’s force changes the situation, but the text does not identify it as a conscious moral judge assigning guilt to one owner.
Pity develops into a reciprocal commitment
Ulrich manages to drink wine and offers the flask across. Georg declines, citing his injured sight and enmity. Ulrich then thinks, watches the other’s pain and lets the hatred weaken; the offered aid is part of a developing change rather than a drink that Georg accepts and instantly makes them friends. Ulrich promises to have Georg helped first and asks for friendship. After a long pause, Georg imagines public meetings, visits and peace among their people, and accepts. These are genuine stated changes of intention, not a reconciliation already enacted throughout the countryside.
The rescue assumption is corrected at the last word
The pair shout together. Ulrich sees indistinct figures and counts nine or ten; because Georg brought only seven men, they take these to be Ulrich’s followers. Their expectation makes the approach hopeful before Ulrich’s silence and frightened laughter alter it. The final answer identifies wolves. Fatal danger is strongly suggested, but the story stops before narrating an attack, death or later rescue. A reading can take the ending as bleak without supplying a witnessed event the narrative withholds.
Sources for this lesson
Pause and explain
Who are the approaching figures identified by the last word?
Worked example
Why should “they are saved because they have forgiven each other” be corrected?
Show the worked solution
- The men make peace and call for assistance.
- The approaching figures are initially mistaken for human rescuers.
- The final word corrects that expectation to wolves.
Answer A changed relationship does not produce a reported rescue; the reversal separates moral intention from control over the outcome.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
How does the first paragraph change the meaning of a hunting scene?
Give me a hint
Locate the correction from expected animal to actual target.
Compare my reasoning
- The opening resembles a watch for quarry.
- The target is revealed as a human enemy.
The delayed correction makes the patrol’s violence and the rivalry disturbing; this is not an ordinary lawful hunt.
Look for these in your work
- Use the initial expectation
- Explain its correction
Trace the change from the flask offer to the promise of friendship.
Give me a hint
Retain Georg’s refusal and both men’s pauses.
Compare my reasoning
- Georg refuses wine with an enemy.
- Ulrich’s pity develops into an offer of priority help; Georg later accepts friendship.
The reconciliation develops through physical vulnerability, thought and reciprocal commitment rather than follows an immediately shared drink.
Look for these in your work
- Use the actual order
- Distinguish offer and acceptance
Revise “The figures prove that peace controls the forest”.
Give me a hint
Compare the counting with the final identification.
Compare my reasoning
- The men interpret the figures through their followers’ numbers.
- The wolves overturn this human expectation.
Peace changes their intentions, but the ending exposes limits to their knowledge and control of the surrounding world.
Look for these in your work
- Use the counting and correction
- Avoid an invented aftermath
Common mistakes
- Do not present Georg’s claim of theft as the narrator’s account of the legal ruling.
- Do not turn a strongly suggested fatal outcome into a described attack or invent a rescue.
What can you explain now?
Who are the approaching figures identified by the last word?
Compare with the explanation
Wolves; the story then stops before narrating an attack or rescue.
The final identification overturns the men’s assumption that their followers are coming.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Who are the approaching figures identified by the last word?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.