Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0408

Ten-story pathway · recall every member and revise a specific gap

Test the whole ten-story selection beyond title recognition · Correct perspective, sequence and ending errors · Turn a weak response into a concrete reading and writing task

Cambridge IGCSE World Literature 0408 · SET-2026-6 / SET-2027-6 / SET-2028-4 / 2025-P3-A / 2025-P3-B / 2028-P3-A / 2028-P3-B
Exam scope and assessment notes

0408 preparation for exam year(s) 2026, 2027, 2028. The assessment changes in 2028; follow the component and selected texts for your year. Original StudyForA teaching and practice for the 2026, 2027 and 2028 Stories of Ourselves Volume 2 Paper 3 option. Read all ten prescribed stories in your centre-selected anthology. Teaching is available for all ten stories: twenty named reading and writing lessons plus four full-selection workshops. Complete reading and independently supported writing are still required. The protected anthology is not reproduced in full. Public-domain texts and selected extracts are primary transcriptions; Wodehouse and Woolf use brief quotations and original commentary with linked complete reading sources. These are not Cambridge examination passages; punctuation and spelling may differ from the anthology. Models do not award Cambridge marks or grades. Other supported interpretations can be valid. Qualified teacher assessment and calibrated full papers remain unfinished. This is not the different 2025 Volume 2 selection or the 2029–2030 Volume 3 selection. Listed stories are not eligible for 2026–2027 coursework, and the revised 2028 coursework requires drama.

Before you begin

  • Confirm your exam year is 2026, 2027 or 2028 and your centre selected this ten-story option. Read the complete story before the analysis and writing lesson. All ten members need preparation; private candidates cannot enter 0408.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What should support a claim about a literary text?

What you will learn

  • Test the whole ten-story selection beyond title recognition
  • Correct perspective, sequence and ending errors
  • Turn a weak response into a concrete reading and writing task

All ten stories · retrieval and evidence review

  • Read the complete story before analysing. Use the linked primary source for any portions not printed here.
  • Write your response before opening the model. Explain the effect of your textual evidence.
  • Check references and quotations against the complete story in your centre’s anthology.

Original self-check practice, not Cambridge examination passages, marked examination scripts or coursework submissions. Models illustrate an argument; they are not the only valid interpretation. Read all ten selected stories. Teacher judgement and full timed assessment remain unfinished.

Death of the Laird’s Jock · Walter Scott

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How do the father’s grief and final effort differ from the daughter’s response?

    Compare after trying

    The father centres his loss on the sword and clan honour, while the daughter mourns her brother and cares for her father. His final exertion does not restore health: he dies three days later.

    The contrast invites a judgement about what a code of honour values and neglects. Explain the narrative’s treatment of that difference, keeping the unnamed son and the letter’s traditional frame accurate.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

George Silverman’s Explanation · Charles Dickens

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does George’s fear of appearing worldly shape his choices, and how does the ending qualify a wholly hopeless reading?

    Compare after trying

    The childhood label becomes an inward pressure that makes George vulnerable to accusations about money. He arranges Adelina’s marriage to Granville and denies his own attachment rather than risk that charge.

    The later accusation is not proved payment, and resignation does not end his life. Support and a new living qualify the suffering; explain the continuing limits of the retrospective voice rather than claim that all religious faith is rejected.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

The Nightingale and the Rose · Oscar Wilde

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does the price of the rose compare with what the Student understands and values at the end?

    Compare after trying

    The Nightingale’s making culminates in sacrifice, but the Student finds the rose without learning its cost or understanding her language. The girl’s preference for jewels and status defeats his hoped-for reward.

    The crushed rose and return to a book refuse an easy reward for the ideal. Explain the gap between the reader’s knowledge and the Student’s judgement; do not invent his gratitude, the bird’s rescue or a successful romance.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

The Copper Beeches · Arthur Conan Doyle

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How do Violet’s observation and the later explanation qualify Holmes’s interpretation of the empty room?

    Compare after trying

    Violet’s mirror gives her access to the watcher and prompts an inference about Mrs Rucastle. At the empty room Holmes supposes the father has removed Alice, but Mrs Toller later explains the earlier escape with Fowler.

    A developed response distinguishes observed detail, provisional inference and later correction. It can value Violet’s resourcefulness without making Holmes the successful rescuer, killing Rucastle or inventing a romance between Violet and Holmes.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

A Story of a Wedding Tour · Margaret Oliphant

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How do the accidental separation, Janey’s later choice and the final return complicate a simple liberation story?

    Compare after trying

    The missed train creates an unplanned separation; Janey subsequently chooses to use the opportunity. The ten-year interval includes work, community and care for John rather than an immediate effortless happiness.

    She helps the dying man before recognising her husband and continues to care for him. He never explains his motive; her guilt does not prove murder. Explain the unresolved emotional cost beside the independent life, without turning reported historical rights into current legal advice.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

The Shrinking Shoe · Walter Besant

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does the five-year contrast change the meaning of the shoe’s promise?

    Compare after trying

    Geoffrey’s anticipated public achievement gives way to inherited status and leisure, while Katie becomes useful through nursing. The poem imagines her ideal of him; it is not evidence that he fulfilled it.

    The later shoe’s change and the departure make renewal conditional. A response should explain the relation between symbol and changed lives without inventing achieved reform, a restored shoe or a wedding that the story never narrates.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

Gabriel-Ernest · Saki (Hector Hugh Munro)

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does the final memorial differ from the evidence available to the reader?

    Compare after trying

    Threatening speech, fearful animals and Cunningham’s transformation report make the assumed rescue doubtful. Van Cheele hears the final scream but does not witness the final attack or transformation.

    The commemorative account gives comforting permanence to a limited inference. Explain how the earlier warnings make it ironic, while keeping probable predation distinct from a narrated eyewitness scene and the refusal to donate distinct from public proof.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

A Warning to the Curious · M R James

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. Why does returning the crown not provide a secure resolution?

    Compare after trying

    Paxton reburies the crown with the helpers and briefly sleeps better, but the later false calls draw him away. His death is real within the account, while the inquest identifies murder by an unknown attacker.

    The nested voices and local history make a supernatural reading powerful without supplying an official finding that a ghost killed him. Explain the failed attempt at restitution alongside those limits of witness and testimony.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

Indian Summer of an Uncle · P G Wodehouse

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does the final admission change the apparent purpose of the luncheon?

    Compare after trying

    Jeeves knew that Mrs Wilberforce was Maudie and intended the reunion. Bertie’s supposed deterrent becomes an effective meeting, and George announces an engagement to the aunt rather than to Rhoda.

    The plan also serves Smethurst’s continuing understanding with Rhoda. Explain the inversion of practical knowledge and formal rank while retaining Agatha’s incomplete information and the unshown future marriage.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

Lappin and Lapinova · Virginia Woolf

Recall first, then verify against the complete story. Add two precise references and explain a method; matching the model’s idea alone is insufficient.

  1. 1. How does the shared game change, and what is actually ended by the final scene?

    Compare after trying

    The private rabbit-and-hare world begins in mutual participation and later protects Rosalind’s sense of self. Ernest briefly returns to it after forgetting, before the final dismissal leaves her need unanswered.

    Lapinova is a white hare, and the apparent gunshot is a key turning. Explain the narrative’s decisive relational ending without inventing a literal killing, a legal divorce, a diagnosis or objective animal identities for the relatives.

    Why this response fits

    • Check each event, speaker and time relation against the complete primary text.
    • Develop an independent supported paragraph and revise any invented outcome before treating this skill as secure.

Recall first, then verify

Answer every member’s prompt without the story, then reopen the complete text. Add two precise references from different moments and explain a narrative method that connects them. Do not interpret a remembered title or model phrase as evidence of complete knowledge. The review deliberately tests vulnerable distinctions: who sees or reports an event, what a character believes, whether an ending states a fact, predicts a future or leaves a motive unknown. A confident but invented event should be corrected before the prose is polished.

Make the revision fit the weakness

If Scott’s final exertion becomes a recovery in your answer, revisit the final time interval. If Holmes becomes Alice’s rescuer, trace the escape and the later account separately. If Woolf’s imagery becomes a literal shooting, read the key at the door beside the ordinary final actions. If Besant’s promise becomes a completed reform, mark conditional language and the point at which the narration stops. Then write a new paragraph answering the actual question; merely copying a model does not demonstrate an independent revision.

Keep completion claims proportionate

This review covers all ten prescribed members in the 2026–2028 option. It accompanies full teaching and explained practice, but it is not a calibrated paper, authenticated coursework or an official grade. Complete reading, independently developed responses and qualified feedback remain necessary. A checked site map reports the availability of preparation resources, not a learner’s percentage mastery. For examination practice retain the year’s required one extract response and one essay, and use your centre’s edition to check any wording or layout differences.

Sources for this lesson

Pause and explain

Do these self-check answers certify Cambridge marks or complete mastery?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A James answer correctly recalls the crown but says reburial makes everyone safe. Choose the next revision.

Show the worked solution
  1. Reread the brief relief, later false calls and Paxton’s death.
  2. Write a paragraph explaining why restitution does not remove the pursuit.
  3. Qualify identification of the attacker with the limits of witness and the inquest.

Answer Target the failed resolution and limits of proof instead of repeating a general plot summary.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A Scott answer says the father mainly mourns his dead son. What should be checked?

Give me a hint

Compare the grief given to father and daughter.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The father centres the sword and honour.
  2. The daughter mourns her brother and cares for him.

Revisit their contrasted grief and explain what the honour code values; retain the son’s unnamed status.

Look for these in your work

  • Correct the attribution
  • Explain the contrast
2 · Independent

A review of Saki gives Van Cheele an eyewitness account of the final attack. Revise it.

Give me a hint

Trace report, sound and public inference.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Cunningham reports a transformation.
  2. Van Cheele hears a scream; the village assumes a rescue.

Keep these separate kinds of evidence and analyse the memorial’s irony without inventing a witnessed attack.

Look for these in your work

  • Identify each witness
  • Limit the certainty
3 · Transfer

A strong-sounding essay has no explanation of its quotations. Choose a revision action.

Give me a hint

Work on one relevant detail before adding more.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Identify the particular effect needed by the question.
  2. Explain how the detail and its position create that effect and test a complication.

Replace quotation display with a supported detail–effect–argument link, then practise independently.

Look for these in your work

  • Explain the method
  • Connect to the actual task

Common mistakes

  • Do not replace rereading with memorising model wording.
  • A linked preparation entry is not a student-completion record.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Do these self-check answers certify Cambridge marks or complete mastery?

Compare with the explanation

No; they guide revision and do not certify assessed performance.

Accurate recall needs developed independent writing and formal assessment before a performance claim.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Do these self-check answers certify Cambridge marks or complete mastery?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning World Literature

Course scope and assessment

238 original lessons provide 714 guided, independent and transfer tasks, plus 431 reading-tracker and long-response prompts. Twenty skill and route entries, three year-specific Cherry Orchard entries, two Anowa entries, three Crocodiles entries, one 2027 Little Foxes entry, two year-specific Volume 1 poetry entries, one historical 2025 Volume 2 poetry entry and three year-specific Volume 2 story entries link teaching. Anowa has ten lessons through the Prologue and all three phases, with thirty staged tasks and ten original developed responses. Complete primary reading locators support analysis of the contested community frame, partnership, enslavement, the children, remembered dream, separation and ending. The protected play is linked rather than reproduced; editorial BECE material is not reused. Both eligible 2025–2026 Anowa rows link the whole-play pathway. Twenty-eight lessons teach the Author’s Note and all six country chapters of In the Sea There Are Crocodiles, with eighty-four staged tasks and sixty original developed responses. Four workshops teach passage analysis, whole-book argument, layered voice and retrieval/revision. All three complete 2025–2027 book entries link the whole-book pathway; the existing supplemental route remains available without adding another counted requirement. The public reflowed reading is linked rather than reproduced, with edition limits explicit. Twenty-two Little Foxes lessons teach all three acts for 2027, with sixty-six staged tasks and forty-eight original developed responses. Hospitality, silenced voices, the mill, financial negotiation, the proposed marriage, Horace’s return and refusal, the bonds, Birdie’s disclosure, withheld help, the final bargain and Alexandra’s decision are taught through actual stage directions and dialogue locators. Four workshops develop passage analysis, whole-play argument, stagecraft and corrective retrieval. SET-2027-2 links the full sequence; the existing supplemental route remains available without inflating counted requirements. The protected acting script is linked rather than reproduced; exact centre-edition wording and revisions must be checked. The Cherry Orchard has an 18-lesson whole-text sequence with five actual Julius West excerpts and three argument models. The 2026–2027 poetry option has teaching for all fourteen members, three complete public-domain poems and close-reading, comparison and retrieval workshops. Twenty-four lessons teach all ten 2026–2028 Stories of Ourselves Volume 2 members, with named reading and writing sequences and evidence, passage-context, essay and ten-member retrieval workshops. Two complete public-domain narratives, nineteen actual prose extracts and Katie’s complete twenty-line poem within Besant’s prose story support close reading and whole-story writing. The Shrinking Shoe follows the original 1895 prose and its five sections; the embedded poem is not a Paper 2 set poem. All three eligible ten-story selection rows link the complete pathway. Wodehouse and Woolf use brief quotations and original commentary with complete reading sources; their full texts are not reproduced here. Twelve lessons teach twelve compulsory 2028–2030 Volume 3 poems, with thirty-six staged tasks and twenty-four developed-response prompts. The Dutt and Kingsley excerpts and Cissoko’s exact translation still need verified reading and teaching; full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so all three complete poetry rows remain unlinked. Fourteen lessons teach seven 2029–2030 Volume 3 stories with thirty-five developed-response prompts. Twelve actual older primary excerpts support four stories; Achebe, Desai and Danticat use original commentary with complete primary reading links rather than reproducing their protected texts. A separate partial-member pathway supports The Necklace, The Model Millionaire, Sultana’s Dream, The Interlopers, The Sacrificial Egg, Sale and New York Day Women without linking either complete ten-story row. The three other members and full-selection workshops remain unfinished. Read the full centre-selected works and protected anthology; check edition differences, including Weissenhorn’s older Necklace translation. The historical 2025 poetry pathway teaches all fourteen members through eighteen lessons, fifty-four staged tasks and fifty-one developed-response models. Three complete public-domain poems remain printed with line breaks; eleven protected poems use complete primary reading links and original commentary. Four workshops teach close analysis, whole-poem argument, preparation comparisons and specific retrieval of all fourteen members. The complete SET-2025-5 option links this sequence; the historical supplemental route remains without increasing counted requirements. Archival Cambridge and WJEC papers supply primary poems, not reused questions or later-year assessment rules. Centre-edition differences remain explicit. Forty-six lessons provide original teaching and practice for nine historical 2025 story members: The Doll’s House, The Gold Watch, A Visit, A Walk to the Jetty, In the Mountains, Mrs. Sen’s, Promenade, The Plantation and The Paper Menagerie. Together they provide one hundred and thirty-eight staged tasks and one hundred and one developed-response models. A Visit uses complete primary reading visually checked across printed pages 306–310. Promenade follows the complete seven-page narrative on printed pages 416–422; its four lessons trace bodily control, wordless meetings, the interrupted circuit and changed final walk. Mrs. Sen’s has six lessons through the complete story, with eighteen staged tasks and thirteen developed-response models. Teaching follows the collection scan from its unnumbered opening through printed p.135, with food, letters, recordings, separate journeys and the changed final care arrangement. The Plantation has five lessons, fifteen staged tasks and eleven developed-response models through all four numbered sections, visually checked against printed pages 423–429 through the final dawn bird-call. In the Mountains has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the final invitation to eat. The complete publisher transcription supports scene-based reading; automated-text errors and subscription access remain explicit, and original printed pages were not visually verified. A Walk to the Jetty has seven lessons, twenty-one staged tasks and fifteen developed-response models through the complete six-page retype’s final berth. Reader annotations and the appended question are separate; the complete publisher version has wording differences, so exact quotations require the approved edition. The centre edition remains required for exact quotations. The protected stories are linked, not reproduced. The partial member pathway is supplemental; Words and full-selection workshops remain unfinished, so SET-2025-6 stays unlinked. Fifteen year-specific prescribed-work entries remain unfinished; complete centre-selected coursework reading also needs substantive text-specific teaching. The 51-entry map is a StudyForA preparation map, not official numbered syllabus sections or a percentage of student mastery. Written practice is self-checked and is not officially marked. Full timed papers and qualified literature-teacher assessment remain unfinished. Fictional exercises are labelled separately from actual excerpts; alternative well-supported readings can be valid. Centre-authenticated coursework and Cambridge moderation are separate from self-check practice.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.