Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9700

Estimate tissue water potential from plant-tissue mass changes

Changes in standardized plant-tissue mass across known solutions can locate the concentration at which there is no net water movement.

Movement into and out of cells pathway · 4.2

AS Level · Cambridge International Biology 9700, 2028–2030. These lessons explain membrane transport and investigation reasoning. Written practice is self-checked; it does not demonstrate supervised practical competence or replace teacher-reviewed assessment.

Before you begin

  • Relate phospholipid and protein structure to their roles, and distinguish a concentration gradient from the direction of net movement.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does zero percentage mass change suggest in a plant-tissue osmosis investigation?

What you will learn

  • Investigate plant tissue in solutions of differing water potential
  • Estimate tissue water potential from a zero-net-change result using an appropriate calibration

Measure water movement consistently

Cut equal-sized plant-tissue cylinders, record initial masses and place them for equal times in a series of known solutions. Remove them, blot consistently and record final masses. Keep temperature, solution volume, tissue source and dimensions as constant as possible.

Calculate percentage mass change = (final mass − initial mass) ÷ initial mass × 100. Repeats help identify variability. Positive mass change indicates net water uptake; negative change indicates net water loss under the test conditions.

Use the isotonic point as an estimate

Plot percentage mass change against the known solution concentration or water potential. The point where percentage mass change is zero estimates the isotonic condition: no net water movement between tissue and solution.

Use a supplied calibration or known water potentials to estimate the tissue water potential at that point. Without a calibration linking solution concentration to water potential, report the isotonic concentration rather than inventing a numerical water potential.

Pause and explain

What additional information is needed to report tissue water potential from an isotonic concentration?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A tissue cylinder changes from 2.00 g to 2.10 g in one solution. Calculate percentage mass change and interpret its sign.

Show the worked solution
  1. Change = 0.10 g.
  2. 0.10 ÷ 2.00 × 100 = 5%.

Answer Percentage mass change = (2.10−2.00) ÷ 2.00 × 100 = +5%. The tissue gained mass, consistent with net water uptake under these conditions.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A 1.50 g tissue sample becomes 1.44 g. Calculate percentage mass change.

Give me a hint

Use (final−initial) ÷ initial × 100.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Change = −0.06 g.
  2. −0.06 ÷ 1.50 ×100 = −4%.

Percentage mass change = (1.44−1.50) ÷ 1.50 ×100 = −4%. The sample lost 4% of its starting mass.

Look for these in your work

  • Change sign correct
  • Initial mass used as denominator
2 · Independent

One solution causes +6% mass change and another causes −3%. What does the zero-change point between them estimate?

Give me a hint

Interpret where net uptake changes to net loss.

Compare my reasoning
  1. At the zero-change point, there is no net mass change.
  2. It estimates the isotonic solution condition for the tissue.

The solution at the zero percentage mass change estimates the isotonic condition, where there is no net water movement between tissue and solution under the method conditions.

Look for these in your work

  • Zero point interpreted
  • No-net-water-movement stated
3 · Transfer

A student reports tissue water potential as −0.35 MPa from an isotonic sucrose concentration but has no concentration-to-potential table or calibration. Explain the limitation.

Give me a hint

Separate the isotonic concentration from a numerical water potential.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The experiment locates the isotonic concentration.
  2. A calibration is needed to convert it to water potential.

The data may estimate the isotonic sucrose concentration, but a concentration-to-water-potential calibration or supplied reference is needed to justify −0.35 MPa. The numerical value should not be invented.

Look for these in your work

  • Measured inference stated
  • Missing calibration identified

Common mistakes

  • Using final mass as the percentage denominator
  • Failing to blot surface solution consistently
  • Converting isotonic concentration into a water potential without a calibration
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does zero percentage mass change suggest in a plant-tissue osmosis investigation?

Compare with the explanation

No net water movement under those conditions

Equal water potentials give no net osmosis.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How do mass changes identify an isotonic condition, and when can you report a numerical tissue water potential?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Biology

Course scope and assessment

Two hundred and fifty-nine new lessons map every published learning outcome in Cambridge International Biology 9700 Topics 1–19 for exams 2028–2030. Each topic lesson includes guided, independent and transfer practice. Fifteen additional practical-assessment lessons provide online preparation for Paper 3 and Paper 5 practical assessment skills. Online Paper 3 lessons cannot provide supervised laboratory competence. Full timed cumulative exam practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding, so this is not exam-readiness evidence.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.