Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9700

Use a t-test to compare two means

Use the supplied t-test formula and critical values to assess whether two sample means differ significantly.

Variation pathway · 17.1

A Level; Cambridge International Biology 9700, 2028–2030. Written answers and calculations are self-checked; this is not fieldwork or practical-skills certification.

Before you begin

  • Populations contain inherited variation, and alleles can be transmitted from parents to offspring.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does the t-test compare in this syllabus outcome?

What you will learn

  • Use a t-test to compare means of two samples
  • Interpret the result relative to a null hypothesis, degrees of freedom and supplied critical value

Original teaching model. Measurements, categories, DNA fragments and comparison records are invented; assumptions and sample boundaries are stated.

Group continuous length records into intervals without losing boundaries or frequenciesEqual-width numerical intervals adjoin; each original length is assigned once.Invented pod-length frequency histogramVertical scale: number of pods02468440–<50750–<60660–<70370–<80Pod body length / mmLower boundary included; upperboundary excludedTotal: 20 valid pods
Equal-width numerical intervals adjoin; each original length is assigned once.
Variation measurement and evidence key
FeatureMeaning
Classes40–<50 / 50–<60 / 60–<70 / 70–<80 mm
Counts4 / 7 / 6 / 3; total 20
Percentages20% / 35% / 30% / 15%
Raw-data mean1168 mm ÷ 20 = 58.4 mm

Build the evolutionary explanation

Use a t-test to assess the significance of a difference between two samples with continuous data, including samples with fewer than 30 observations. The data should come from normally distributed populations with approximately equal standard deviations. Compare their means using the supplied formula, then calculate degrees of freedom v=n1+n2−2. State a null hypothesis that the two population means do not differ significantly. Compare the calculated t with the supplied critical value at the chosen significance level. If calculated t exceeds the critical value, reject the null hypothesis; otherwise there is insufficient evidence to reject it.

Interpret data with care

A significant difference does not prove that the tested factor caused the difference. Check that samples are appropriate, the correct formula and degrees of freedom are used, and the comparison is at the stated significance level. The formula is supplied in the examination.

Pause and explain

You are given two sample means, sample sizes and a critical-value table. Outline the sequence for a t-test.

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A calculated t is below the critical t value at p=0.05. What is the conclusion?

Show the worked solution
  1. Compare calculated and critical values.
  2. A smaller calculated value is not significant at that level.

Answer There is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at p=0.05; the difference is not significant by this test.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A calculated t exceeds the supplied critical t value. State the statistical conclusion.

Give me a hint

Identify the population-level variable and sequence the mechanism.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The calculated statistic exceeds the rejection threshold.
  2. Reject the null hypothesis at the stated significance level.

Reject the null hypothesis: the sample means differ significantly at the stated significance level. This does not by itself identify the cause.

Look for these in your work

  • Population process identified
  • Cause and consequence linked
2 · Independent

A learner says p>0.05 proves that two population means are identical. Correct the claim.

Give me a hint

Use the supplied sample or condition to justify the conclusion.

Compare my reasoning
  1. A non-significant result is insufficient evidence to reject the null.
  2. It is not proof of exact equality.

A non-significant result means there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at that level; it does not prove the population means are identical.

Look for these in your work

  • Evidence interpreted
  • Assumptions stated
3 · Transfer

You are given two sample means, sample sizes and a critical-value table. Outline the sequence for a t-test.

Give me a hint

Apply the population model to the new example and qualify its limits.

Compare my reasoning
  1. State the null hypothesis and use the supplied formula.
  2. Find degrees of freedom and compare calculated and critical t.

State the null hypothesis; use the supplied t-test formula; determine the required degrees of freedom; compare calculated t with the critical value at the stated significance level; and state whether there is sufficient evidence to reject the null.

Look for these in your work

  • Model applied
  • Limits preserved

Common mistakes

  • Using a chi-squared test to compare sample means
  • Claiming a non-significant result proves the means are equal
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does the t-test compare in this syllabus outcome?

Compare with the explanation

Means of two samples

The test evaluates whether the difference between sample means is statistically significant.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How does the calculated t value determine the conclusion?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Biology

Course scope and assessment

Two hundred and fifty-nine new lessons map every published learning outcome in Cambridge International Biology 9700 Topics 1–19 for exams 2028–2030. Each topic lesson includes guided, independent and transfer practice. Fifteen additional practical-assessment lessons provide online preparation for Paper 3 and Paper 5 practical assessment skills. Online Paper 3 lessons cannot provide supervised laboratory competence. Full timed cumulative exam practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding, so this is not exam-readiness evidence.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.