Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0972

Detect electrostatic charge with an electroscope

Explain leaf divergence, distinguish non-contact redistribution from contact transfer, and use a known reference when identifying sign.

Electric charge pathway · 0972 (9–1) · 4.2.1
Exam scope and assessment notes

Core and Extended · Physics 0972, 2026–2028. Follow the selected magnetism or charge section. Field lines are explanatory models, not material threads or measured force values. Written practice is self-checked. Human subject-teacher review, supervised practical competence and cumulative assessment remain pending. Cambridge states that IGCSE 0972 has the same subject content as IGCSE 0625, with 9–1 grading. This StudyForA pathway maps the 2026–2028 syllabus only. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. Cambridge has published a separate syllabus for 2029. StudyForA has not reconciled that version yet; this page supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

Before you begin

  • Recall like-charge repulsion.
  • Distinguish electron movement inside an object from transfer across its boundary.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Why can two like-charged leaves separate?

What you will learn

  • Describe simple electroscope charge detection.
  • Explain why initial state and contact determine the interpretation.
Original qualitative electroscope sketch contrasts initially closed leaves with divergence when a positive rod is brought near without contact. Electrons redistribute toward the cap and the leaves are left with like positive charge. Leaf divergence can show an electrostatic response but does not alone determine an unknown rod's sign or prove net charge transfer into the detector.Electroscope: separate observationsInitially neutralPositive rod+−++Approach: charge redistributesContact is a different process
Original qualitative electroscope sketch contrasts initially closed leaves with divergence when a positive rod is brought near without contact. Electrons redistribute toward the cap and the leaves are left with like positive charge. Leaf divergence can show an electrostatic response but does not alone determine an unknown rod's sign or prove net charge transfer into the detector.

Approach without touching

A leaf electroscope connects a conducting cap and stem to light conducting leaves, held on an insulating support. Begin with a neutral detector and closed leaves. Bring a charged rod near the cap without touching it. The detector's electrons redistribute; the leaves acquire like charge and repel, so they diverge.

For a positive nearby rod, electrons move toward the cap, leaving the leaves relatively positive. For a negative rod, electrons are pushed away from the cap toward the leaves, which become negative. In either ideal isolated non-contact case, the detector's total charge remains zero while its regions have different balances.

Control the initial condition

Remove the rod: an initially neutral isolated detector can return to its original distribution and the leaves close. Touching the cap with a charged object is a different procedure that can transfer charge and leave persistent divergence after removal. Do not treat every observation of divergence as evidence of net charge transferred to the detector.

Divergence of initially neutral leaves detects a response but does not determine an unknown sign. A known precharged electroscope can help compare a weak approaching charge under controlled conditions, but large approach can redistribute enough charge to make a naive leaf rule ambiguous. A clear repulsion test against a known charge is a simpler sign reference. Humidity, leakage and detector sensitivity remain practical limitations.

Pause and explain

A rod approaches a neutral isolated cap without contact. Must the detector gain net charge?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A positive rod approaches an initially neutral isolated electroscope without contact. Explain the cap and leaf responses.

Show the worked solution
  1. Electrons are attracted toward the cap.
  2. The leaves are left with an electron deficit and like positive charge.
  3. They repel while the whole detector remains net neutral.

Answer Cap becomes relatively negative; both leaves relatively positive and divergent; total detector charge stays zero.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Describe how a neutral electroscope can detect a nearby charged rod.

Give me a hint

State the initial leaves, approach method and observed response.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Begin with closed leaves on a neutral isolated detector.
  2. Approach the cap with the rod without touching it.
  3. A charge response can redistribute electrons and cause leaf divergence.

Non-contact approach produces like-charge leaves and divergence in a responding detector.

Look for these in your work

  • Describe the observation.
  • Keep contact separate.
2 · Independent

For separate positive-rod and negative-rod approaches, give the leaf signs in the ideal neutral detector.

Give me a hint

Track whether electrons move toward or away from the cap.

Compare my reasoning
  1. A positive rod draws electrons toward the cap, leaving positive leaves.
  2. A negative rod pushes electrons toward the leaves, making them negative.
  3. Both like-sign leaf pairs repel.

Positive rod: positive leaves; negative rod: negative leaves; both can diverge.

Look for these in your work

  • State both cases.
  • Explain the electron redistribution.
3 · Transfer

Leaves remain divergent after a rod touches the cap and is removed. Is this the same evidence as a non-contact approach?

Give me a hint

Check whether charge could cross the detector boundary.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Contact permits charge transfer.
  2. Retained net charge can sustain leaf divergence after removal.
  3. Non-contact divergence alone need not change the total charge.

No; contact can leave transferred net charge, whereas non-contact redistribution alone need not.

Look for these in your work

  • Name the changed boundary condition.
  • Avoid identifying the unknown sign from persistence alone.

Common mistakes

  • Initial neutrality is a stated condition.
  • Non-contact redistribution is not net transfer.
  • Leaf divergence alone does not reveal an unknown sign.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Can both positive and negative rods make initially neutral leaves diverge?

Compare with the explanation

Yes.

Each can produce like charges on the two leaves, with opposite signs in the two trials.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Explain detection using electron redistribution and separate charge sign, net transfer and leaf divergence.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Physics (9-1)

Course scope and assessment

491 sequenced Physics lessons provide 1473 guided, independent and application problems. 58 of 58 syllabus sections have full linked teaching sequences; 0 sections remain pending. Three earlier starter overviews remain available but are not counted as full sequences. The map covers all six subject areas for 2026–2028 and keeps review and assessment limits visible. This is available content, not full programme completion, an exam grade or certified mastery. Written practice is self-checked. Supervised practical experience, cumulative assessment and human subject-teacher review remain pending. Paper method exercises do not demonstrate practical competence or complete either practical-assessment route. This is the separate 9–1 qualification 0972; Cambridge states that its 2026–2028 subject content is otherwise the same as 0625. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. The 2029 syllabus is separately published at https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/764368-2029-syllabus.pdf and is not yet mapped here. This course supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.