Construct a key with mutually exclusive choices
Build and check a two-choice key that reaches every supplied specimen.
Exam scope and assessment notes
Core and Extended · Biology 0970, 2026–2028. Use the stated specimen features and evidence. Diagrams are schematic. Written practice is self-checked; human subject-teacher review, supervised practical competence and cumulative assessment remain pending. Cambridge states that IGCSE 0970 has the same subject content as IGCSE 0610, with 9–1 grading. This StudyForA pathway maps the 2026–2028 syllabus only. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. Cambridge has published a separate syllabus for 2029. StudyForA has not reconciled that version yet; this page supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.
Before you begin
- Read the stated observations before choosing a group.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
Which pair makes a consistent two-way split?
What you will learn
- Write contrasting observable alternatives.
- Validate that each supplied specimen reaches one endpoint.
Start from a feature table
Suppose four leaf specimens are described: A is needle-shaped; B is broad, simple and smooth-edged; C is broad, simple and toothed; D is broad and compound. These are reported specimen features, not a taxonomic judgement about relatedness.
First separate needle-shaped from broad. For the broad leaves, separate compound from simple. Finally split the simple leaves into smooth-edged and toothed. Each decision uses the same feature on both alternatives, rather than contrasting unrelated observations such as small versus green.
Test every endpoint
Follow each supplied specimen through the finished key. A, B, C and D must each reach one distinct endpoint. A feature stated as broad or simple cannot be silently reinterpreted halfway through. Overlapping or missing choices can leave a specimen with two routes or no route.
An unfamiliar leaf outside the supplied set may not fit this key. Write not identifiable with this key rather than forcing a name. Identification does not replace a broader classification scheme or DNA evidence about evolutionary relationships.
Pause and explain
How should a finished key be checked?
Worked example
Write the final decision for two supplied simple broad leaves, one smooth-edged and one toothed.
Show the worked solution
- Use the same feature, edge type.
- Smooth-edged leads to B.
- Toothed leads to C.
Answer Smooth edge → B; toothed edge → C.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Construct the first two decisions for the four supplied leaves.
Give me a hint
Separate needle shape, then compound structure.
Compare my reasoning
- Needle-shaped → A; broad → decision 2.
- Compound → D; simple → decision 3.
- Decision 3 will compare edge type.
1: needle-shaped → A, broad → 2. 2: compound → D, simple → 3.
Look for these in your work
- Two alternatives per decision.
- Correct endpoints and continuation.
Complete decision 3 and trace leaf C.
Give me a hint
Leaf C is broad, simple and toothed.
Compare my reasoning
- Decision 1 broad.
- Decision 2 simple.
- Decision 3 toothed → C.
3: smooth → B, toothed → C; C follows broad → simple → toothed.
Look for these in your work
- Complete both final alternatives.
- Trace C consistently.
An extra specimen has a broad simple leaf with a lobed edge, described as neither smooth nor toothed. What revision is needed?
Give me a hint
The existing final decision lacks a route.
Compare my reasoning
- The new observation reaches decision 3.
- Neither old alternative matches.
- Revise the restricted set or add a valid two-choice decision separating the new feature.
The key needs an additional valid split or a narrower stated scope.
Look for these in your work
- Identify the missing route.
- Keep decisions dichotomous.
Common mistakes
- Do not pair alternatives that overlap, such as green versus broad.
- Test the key on every supplied specimen, not just the first one.
What can you explain now?
Why is small versus green a poor pair of alternatives?
Compare with the explanation
A leaf can be both small and green.
The choices overlap rather than providing exclusive routes.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
Reconstruct the leaf key from its feature table and test all four endpoints.
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.