Learn in your language
Skip to content
IGCSE · Cambridge (CIE) · 0970

Evaluate original stem-cell descendant records with clear evidence limits

Invented descendant counts: six F and four G out of ten give sixty and forty per cent, a twenty-percentage-point difference. They establish no universal potential, division rate or treatment result.

Mitosis pathway · 0970 (9–1) · 17.2
Exam scope and assessment notes

Extended only (Supplement) · Biology 0970, 2026–2028. Use the stated specimen features and evidence. Diagrams are schematic. Written practice is self-checked; human subject-teacher review, supervised practical competence and cumulative assessment remain pending. Cambridge states that IGCSE 0970 has the same subject content as IGCSE 0610, with 9–1 grading. This StudyForA pathway maps the 2026–2028 syllabus only. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. Cambridge has published a separate syllabus for 2029. StudyForA has not reconciled that version yet; this page supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

Before you begin

  • Recall chromosomes, genes, chromosome sets, selective gene expression and the distinction between a nucleus and a whole cell.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Six of ten descendants show type F features. What is the observed proportion?

What you will learn

  • Interpret the observed specialised outcomes
  • Avoid unsupported universal or clinical claims

Original teaching model. Counts and records are stipulated; drawings are schematic.

Evaluate original stem-cell descendant records with clear evidence limitsInvented descendant counts: six F and four G out of ten give sixty and forty per cent, a twenty-percentage-point difference. They establish no universal potential, division rate or treatment result.Invented ten-descendant recordObserved states; not a clinical resultF660% of the ten descendantsG440% of the ten descendants0510Observed descendant count60% − 40% = 20 percentage pointsTwo observed types do not establishevery possible type
Invented descendant counts: six F and four G out of ten give sixty and forty per cent, a twenty-percentage-point difference. They establish no universal potential, division rate or treatment result.
Division, chromosome count and cell-state key
FeatureMeaning
Observed descendants10 total: 6 F and 4 G
F proportion60% of the observed record
G proportion40%; difference 20 percentage points
LimitNo universal potential, timed rate or clinical outcome

Interpret the observed specialised outcomes

An original fictional record follows ten descendants from a labelled stem-cell population. Six later show the supplied features of specialised type F, and four show the supplied features of type G. The record supports those two observed outcomes under the stated conditions. It does not demonstrate that the population can produce every other type of cell.

The proportions are six out of ten, or sixty per cent, for F and four out of ten, or forty per cent, for G. Their difference is twenty percentage points, not a twenty-per-cent relative increase. The record counts observed descendant states and supplies no times, so it does not establish a mitotic division rate or the probability of all future outcomes.

Avoid unsupported universal or clinical claims

A stem-cell explanation also needs the connection between an unspecialised source, mitotic daughter-cell production and potential specialisation. Shape observations alone do not directly test every chromosome sequence or exclude all alternative lineage histories. The teaching record stipulates its source and normal division so you can practise the stated mechanism without presenting those stipulations as laboratory proof.

These invented proportions are not results of a human trial, treatment success rates or instructions for cell culture. A real claim would need appropriate population identification, lineage evidence, controls and repeated observations. Within this lesson, give the supported conclusion, the denominator and the missing evidence rather than expanding a small record into a promise of universal biological or clinical performance.

Pause and explain

What does the fictional F/G record establish within its scope?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Ten descendants include six F and four G. What observed proportions apply?

Show the worked solution
  1. Use ten as the denominator for both.
  2. Compare percentage points separately.

Answer F is sixty per cent, G is forty per cent and the difference is twenty percentage points.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Calculate the observed F and G percentages from six F and four G descendants out of ten.

Give me a hint

Use the same denominator.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Calculate six divided by ten times one hundred.
  2. Calculate four divided by ten times one hundred.

F is sixty per cent and G is forty per cent of the ten observed descendants.

Look for these in your work

  • Show both denominators
  • Label observed proportions
2 · Independent

Calculate the percentage-point difference between those proportions and distinguish it from a guaranteed future outcome.

Give me a hint

Subtract the observed percentages.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Calculate sixty minus forty.
  2. Keep the result limited to the supplied record.

The difference is twenty percentage points in this observed fictional record; it does not guarantee the proportions of future descendants.

Look for these in your work

  • Use percentage points
  • Retain the record limit
3 · Transfer

A claim says the ten descendants prove the source can form every body-cell type and cure a disease. Evaluate it.

Give me a hint

Compare the claimed scope with the observed F/G outcomes.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Identify that only F and G are observed.
  2. State that other potential and treatment outcomes are untested.

The claim is unsupported. The record shows only the supplied F and G outcomes, not every cell type or clinical treatment success.

Look for these in your work

  • Identify the overreach
  • State what is actually supported

Common mistakes

  • Observed proportions are not guaranteed future probabilities.
  • Two supported types do not establish every possible cell type.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does the fictional F/G record establish within its scope?

Compare with the explanation

The two observed outcomes under the stated conditions

The record is limited to the given descendants.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Without your notes, interpret the observed specialised outcomes and avoid unsupported universal or clinical claims. Distinguish nuclear division, chromosome copies and completed daughter cells before opening the solutions.

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Biology (9-1)

Course scope and assessment

780 sequenced lessons provide 2340 guided, independent and application problems in characteristics, classification, cells, organisation, specimen size, membrane transport, biological molecules, enzymes, plant and human nutrition, plant transport, circulatory systems, the heart, blood vessels, blood, disease transmission, body defences, immunity, gas exchange in humans, respiration energy uses and investigations, aerobic respiration, anaerobic respiration and recovery, excretion in humans, coordination and response, sense organs, hormones, homeostasis, tropic responses, drugs, asexual reproduction, sexual reproduction, sexual reproduction in plants, sexual reproduction in humans, sex hormones in humans, sexually transmitted infections, chromosomes, genes and proteins, mitosis, meiosis, monohybrid inheritance, variation, adaptive features, selection, energy flow, food chains and webs, nutrient cycles, population, community, ecosystem, population-growth phases, food supply, habitat destruction, pollution, conservation, biotechnology and genetic modification. 61 of 61 syllabus sections have linked teaching and staged practice. The earlier inheritance overview remains introductory, and the monohybrid pathway develops the relevant Core and Supplement requirements. This is not full programme completion or guaranteed exam readiness. Written practice is self-checked. This is the separate 9–1 qualification 0970; Cambridge states that its 2026–2028 subject content is otherwise the same as 0610. This 9–1 graded qualification is available only in a limited number of administrative zones. Confirm that your centre can enter you for this code and exam series with Cambridge International. The 2029 syllabus is separately published at https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/764352-2029-syllabus.pdf and is not yet mapped here. This course supports exams in 2026, 2027 and 2028 only.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.