Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9702

Apply Faraday's and Lenz's laws

Relate induced e.m.f. to the rate of change of flux linkage and use Lenz's law to determine its opposing direction.

Magnetic fields · Cambridge International AS & A Level Physics 9702 · 20.5

A Level; Cambridge International Physics 9702, 2025–2027 syllabus, Topic 20. These original explanations and calculations are study aids; full timed assessment and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding.

Before you begin

  • Use current, charge, force, velocity, vectors, area and SI units; distinguish conventional current from electron flow.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does Faraday's law relate induced e.m.f. to?

What you will learn

  • Use Faraday's law for induced e.m.f. magnitude
  • Apply Lenz's law to determine induced direction
  • Explain how the induced effect opposes its cause

Faraday's law links e.m.f. to changing flux linkage

Faraday's law states that the magnitude of induced e.m.f. is proportional to the rate of change of magnetic flux linkage. For a coil of N turns, |ε| = |Δ(NΦ)/Δt| over an interval, or |ε| = N|dΦ/dt| for a uniform rate.

A larger change in flux or a shorter time produces a larger e.m.f. If the linkage stays constant, the rate of change is zero and there is no induced e.m.f.

Lenz's law gives the opposing direction

Lenz's law states that the induced current is in a direction such that its magnetic effect opposes the change in flux that produced it. It opposes the change, not necessarily the original field itself: if flux is increasing, the induced field acts against that increase; if flux is decreasing, it acts to support the original flux.

The minus sign in ε = −Δ(NΦ)/Δt represents this opposition. Use the sequence: identify the original flux direction, decide whether it is increasing or decreasing, choose the induced field that opposes that change, then use the coil orientation to infer current direction.

|ε| = |Δ(NΦ)/Δt| · Lenz: induced effect opposes the change producing it

Pause and explain

If flux linkage doubles in the same time interval, what happens to average induced e.m.f. magnitude?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A 100-turn coil's flux per turn changes from 0.80 mWb to 0.20 mWb in 0.050 s. Find the average induced e.m.f. magnitude.

Show the worked solution
  1. Find the change in flux linkage: NΔΦ.
  2. Convert mWb to Wb and divide by time.
  3. Use magnitude; infer direction separately with Lenz's law.

Answer |ε| = 100 × 0.60 × 10⁻³/0.050 = 1.2 V.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A 200-turn coil's flux per turn changes by 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ Wb in 0.020 s. Calculate average induced e.m.f. magnitude.

Give me a hint

Use |ε| = N|ΔΦ|/Δt and include the turn count before dividing by the time.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Δ(NΦ) = 200 × 3.0 × 10⁻⁴ = 0.060 Wb-turn.
  2. |ε| = 0.060/0.020.
  3. State volts.

|ε| = 3.0 V.

Look for these in your work

  • Turns included
  • Linkage change calculated
  • Time division and unit correct
2 · Independent

An upward magnetic flux through a coil is increasing. In which direction must the induced magnetic field act?

Give me a hint

Apply Lenz's law to oppose the increase in upward flux.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The original flux points upward and is increasing.
  2. The induced effect opposes that increase.
  3. The induced magnetic field points downward.

Downward, opposing the increase in upward flux.

Look for these in your work

  • Original direction identified
  • Increasing trend identified
  • Opposing field stated
3 · Transfer

A coil's flux linkage changes by the same amount in 0.10 s and in 0.025 s. Compare the induced e.m.f. magnitudes.

Give me a hint

For a fixed linkage change, e.m.f. magnitude is inversely proportional to time.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The second interval is one quarter of the first.
  2. The same linkage change occurs four times as quickly.
  3. The induced e.m.f. magnitude is four times as large in 0.025 s.

The shorter-interval change induces four times the e.m.f. magnitude.

Look for these in your work

  • Time ratio found
  • Rate comparison made
  • E.m.f. ratio stated

Common mistakes

  • Applying Faraday's law to flux but omitting the number of turns
  • Using a final flux instead of change in flux
  • Saying Lenz's law opposes the magnetic field in all cases
  • Ignoring the time interval when comparing induced e.m.f.
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does Faraday's law relate induced e.m.f. to?

Compare with the explanation

Rate of change of flux linkage

A more rapid linkage change gives a larger e.m.f.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How do Faraday's law and Lenz's law together determine induced e.m.f. magnitude and direction?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Physics

Course scope and assessment

One hundred and sixty-two original lessons cover all 12 published subject-content outcomes in Topic 1 (sections 1.1–1.4), all nine outcomes in Topic 2 (section 2.1), all 13 outcomes in Topic 3 (sections 3.1–3.3), all 13 outcomes in Topic 4 (sections 4.1–4.3), all 11 outcomes in Topic 5 (sections 5.1–5.2), all 10 outcomes in Topic 6 (sections 6.1–6.2), all 16 outcomes in Topic 7 (sections 7.1–7.5), all 12 outcomes in Topic 8 (sections 8.1–8.4), all 15 outcomes in Topic 9 (sections 9.1–9.3), all 16 outcomes in Topic 10 (sections 10.1–10.3), all 18 outcomes in Topic 11 (sections 11.1–11.2), all seven outcomes in Topic 12 (sections 12.1–12.2), all 12 outcomes in Topic 13 (sections 13.1–13.4), all eight outcomes in Topic 14 (sections 14.1–14.3), and all nine outcomes in Topic 15 (sections 15.1–15.3), plus all four outcomes in Topic 16 (sections 16.1–16.2), and all ten outcomes in Topic 17 (sections 17.1–17.3), plus all 12 outcomes in Topic 18 (sections 18.1–18.5), all nine outcomes in Topic 19 (sections 19.1–19.3), all 19 outcomes in Topic 20 (sections 20.1–20.5), and all eight outcomes in Topic 21 (sections 21.1–21.2), and all 17 outcomes in Topic 22 (sections 22.1–22.4), and all 13 outcomes in Topic 23 (sections 23.1–23.2), and all 16 outcomes in Topic 24 (sections 24.1–24.3), and all 11 outcomes in Topic 25 (sections 25.1–25.3), of the 2025–2027 syllabus. Each lesson has guided, independent and application practice with explained answers. All 25 syllabus topics now have mapped teaching and practice; the 2028–2030 changes outside Topics 23–25 still need reconciliation. Online study cannot demonstrate supervised Paper 3 laboratory competence. Paper 5 planning and analysis, full timed cumulative assessment and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.