Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9702

Compare potential differences with a potentiometer null method

Use a balanced potential gradient and a galvanometer zero reading to compare e.m.f.s or potential differences.

D.C. circuits · Cambridge International AS & A Level Physics 9702 · 10.3

AS Level; Cambridge International Physics 9702, 2025–2027 syllabus, Topic 10. These original circuit diagrams and calculations are study aids; full timed assessment, supervised practical competence and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding.

Before you begin

  • Use current, potential difference, resistance, energy and charge with consistent circuit directions.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does zero galvanometer deflection indicate at potentiometer balance?

What you will learn

  • Recall and use the potentiometer principle for comparing p.d.s
  • Explain the galvanometer's role as a null detector
  • Relate balance lengths to potential differences under the same gradient

A potentiometer compares voltage using a balance length

A potentiometer wire carrying a steady current can provide a uniform potential gradient along its length if the wire is uniform and operating conditions stay fixed. A sliding contact is moved until the wire segment p.d. matches the unknown source or component p.d.

At balance, the galvanometer shows zero current in the comparison branch. The unknown p.d. equals the p.d. along the measured balance length. With the same gradient, p.d.s are proportional to their balance lengths: V₁/V₂ = l₁/l₂.

A galvanometer detects the null condition

A sensitive galvanometer indicates both the direction and presence of a small current in the test branch. At the null point it reads zero, so the comparison branch draws no current from the unknown source in the ideal method.

A null comparison avoids loading the unknown source during the balanced measurement. Keep the potentiometer-wire current and gradient unchanged when comparing lengths; if the gradient changes, the simple ratio no longer compares the same volts per unit length.

at the same potential gradient: V₁/V₂ = l₁/l₂

Pause and explain

On the same gradient, what happens to balance length if the compared p.d. doubles?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Two sources balance at lengths 0.30 m and 0.45 m on the same potentiometer wire. The first has e.m.f. 1.2 V. Find the second.

Show the worked solution
  1. The gradient is the same, so ε₁/ε₂ = l₁/l₂.
  2. ε₂ = 1.2 × 0.45/0.30.
  3. Check the longer balance length corresponds to larger e.m.f.

Answer ε₂ = 1.8 V.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

On a fixed potentiometer gradient, 0.25 V balances at 0.20 m. Find the balance length for 0.60 V.

Give me a hint

Use direct proportionality between p.d. and length at the same gradient.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The voltage ratio is 0.60/0.25 = 2.4.
  2. l₂ = 2.4 × 0.20 m.
  3. State the length.

0.48 m.

Look for these in your work

  • Same gradient assumed
  • Ratio calculated
  • Length found
2 · Independent

An unknown source balances at 0.35 m. A 1.4 V reference balances at 0.50 m on the unchanged wire. Find the unknown e.m.f.

Give me a hint

Use εunknown/εreference = lunknown/lreference.

Compare my reasoning
  1. εunknown/1.4 = 0.35/0.50.
  2. εunknown = 1.4 × 0.70.
  3. State volts.

0.98 V.

Look for these in your work

  • Length ratio formed
  • Voltage calculated
  • Unit stated
3 · Transfer

The galvanometer reads zero at a potentiometer balance. Explain why this helps compare an unknown source without drawing current from it at balance.

Give me a hint

Relate the null reading to equal potential and branch current.

Compare my reasoning
  1. At balance the sliding contact and unknown source terminals are at equal potential.
  2. With no p.d. across the comparison branch, its current is zero.
  3. The unknown source is therefore not supplying current to the detector branch at the null point.

The zero indicates equal p.d. at the comparison point; no current is drawn from the unknown branch at balance, reducing loading.

Look for these in your work

  • Equal potential identified
  • Zero branch current reasoned
  • Loading benefit stated

Common mistakes

  • Assuming galvanometer zero means no current in the potentiometer wire
  • Changing the wire current between balance measurements without recalibration
  • Using balance-length ratios when the potential gradient changed
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does zero galvanometer deflection indicate at potentiometer balance?

Compare with the explanation

No current flows in the comparison branch

The potentials match at the balance point.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

Why is a zero-current balance useful for comparing a source's e.m.f.?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Physics

Course scope and assessment

One hundred and sixty-two original lessons cover all 12 published subject-content outcomes in Topic 1 (sections 1.1–1.4), all nine outcomes in Topic 2 (section 2.1), all 13 outcomes in Topic 3 (sections 3.1–3.3), all 13 outcomes in Topic 4 (sections 4.1–4.3), all 11 outcomes in Topic 5 (sections 5.1–5.2), all 10 outcomes in Topic 6 (sections 6.1–6.2), all 16 outcomes in Topic 7 (sections 7.1–7.5), all 12 outcomes in Topic 8 (sections 8.1–8.4), all 15 outcomes in Topic 9 (sections 9.1–9.3), all 16 outcomes in Topic 10 (sections 10.1–10.3), all 18 outcomes in Topic 11 (sections 11.1–11.2), all seven outcomes in Topic 12 (sections 12.1–12.2), all 12 outcomes in Topic 13 (sections 13.1–13.4), all eight outcomes in Topic 14 (sections 14.1–14.3), and all nine outcomes in Topic 15 (sections 15.1–15.3), plus all four outcomes in Topic 16 (sections 16.1–16.2), and all ten outcomes in Topic 17 (sections 17.1–17.3), plus all 12 outcomes in Topic 18 (sections 18.1–18.5), all nine outcomes in Topic 19 (sections 19.1–19.3), all 19 outcomes in Topic 20 (sections 20.1–20.5), and all eight outcomes in Topic 21 (sections 21.1–21.2), and all 17 outcomes in Topic 22 (sections 22.1–22.4), and all 13 outcomes in Topic 23 (sections 23.1–23.2), and all 16 outcomes in Topic 24 (sections 24.1–24.3), and all 11 outcomes in Topic 25 (sections 25.1–25.3), of the 2025–2027 syllabus. Each lesson has guided, independent and application practice with explained answers. All 25 syllabus topics now have mapped teaching and practice; the 2028–2030 changes outside Topics 23–25 still need reconciliation. Online study cannot demonstrate supervised Paper 3 laboratory competence. Paper 5 planning and analysis, full timed cumulative assessment and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.