Calculate the field of a point charge
Use the inverse-square field equation and infer direction from the sign of a source charge.
A Level; Cambridge International Physics 9702, 2025–2027 syllabus, Topic 18. These original explanations and calculations are study aids; full timed assessment and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding.
Before you begin
- Use force, charge, work, energy, potential difference, inverse-square relationships and SI units.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
How does point-charge field magnitude depend on distance?
What you will learn
- Use E = Q/(4πε₀r²) for a point charge in free space
- Determine radial field direction from source-charge sign
- Connect point-charge field strength to force on a test charge
Field strength decreases with the square of distance
For a point charge Q in free space, the electric-field strength magnitude at distance r is E = |Q|/(4πε₀r²). The field is radial and has unit N C⁻¹. Doubling r reduces E to one quarter for a fixed source charge.
The signed source charge determines direction: field lines point outward for Q > 0 and inward for Q < 0. The magnitude expression uses |Q|; apply direction separately. A spherical conductor has the same point-charge form for points outside it.
A test charge feels a force in the field
Once E is known, a test charge q experiences F = qE. This separates the field created by source charge Q from the force on a chosen test charge. A negative test charge's force is opposite to the radial field direction.
Do not substitute the test charge q into the source-field equation unless q itself is the charge creating the field being evaluated. Identify which charge creates the field and where the field is measured.
Pause and explain
What is the field direction around a negative point source?
Worked example
Find the field magnitude 0.30 m from a +4.0 nC point charge. State its direction.
Show the worked solution
- Use E = k|Q|/r².
- Substitute 8.99 × 10⁹, 4.0 × 10⁻⁹ C and 0.30 m.
- A positive source charge produces an outward field.
Answer E = 8.99 × 10⁹ × 4.0 × 10⁻⁹/0.30² ≈ 4.0 × 10² N C⁻¹, radially outward.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
Calculate E at 0.20 m from a +2.0 nC point charge. Use k = 8.99 × 10⁹ N m² C⁻².
Give me a hint
Use E = k|Q|/r² and convert nanocoulombs to coulombs.
Compare my reasoning
- Q = 2.0 × 10⁻⁹ C.
- E = (8.99 × 10⁹)(2.0 × 10⁻⁹)/(0.20²).
- Evaluate the magnitude and give the outward direction.
E ≈ 4.5 × 10² N C⁻¹, radially outward.
Look for these in your work
- Charge converted
- Distance squared used
- Magnitude and direction stated
At the same distance from two point charges, one +Q and one −Q, compare field magnitudes and directions.
Give me a hint
Use the magnitude equation and then apply the source signs.
Compare my reasoning
- The charges have equal magnitude, so |E| is equal at equal r.
- The +Q field points away from its source.
- The −Q field points towards its source.
Field magnitudes are equal; directions are radially outward for +Q and inward for −Q.
Look for these in your work
- Magnitude comparison correct
- Positive-source direction correct
- Negative-source direction correct
A +3.0 nC source charge creates a field of 600 N C⁻¹ at a point. Find the force on a −2.0 μC test charge there and give its direction relative to E.
Give me a hint
First use F = qE; the negative sign reverses the field direction.
Compare my reasoning
- |F| = |q|E = 2.0 × 10⁻⁶ × 600.
- |F| = 1.2 × 10⁻³ N.
- Because q is negative, the force is opposite to E.
The force magnitude is 1.2 × 10⁻³ N, opposite the field direction.
Look for these in your work
- Test charge used in force relation
- Magnitude calculated
- Negative-charge direction applied
Common mistakes
- Using r instead of r²
- Confusing the source charge with a test charge
- Reporting field magnitude without direction when direction is asked
- Using a negative field magnitude rather than a direction convention
What can you explain now?
How does point-charge field magnitude depend on distance?
Compare with the explanation
It is proportional to 1/r²
The field follows an inverse-square relationship.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
How do you keep the source charge and test charge roles separate in an electric-field calculation?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.