Calculate electrode potentials with the Nernst equation
Apply the 298 K Nernst equation to aqueous redox couples using the correct electron number and concentration ratio.
A Level; Cambridge International Chemistry 9701, 2028–2030 syllabus, Topic 24. Treat all tabulated electrode potentials as reduction potentials; state conditions, phases, signs and units. Written practice is self-checked
Before you begin
- Use AS redox half-equations, oxidation states, mole ratios, current and charge.
Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.
Quick readiness check
For Fe³⁺ + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺, what is z in the Nernst equation?
What you will learn
- Use E = E° + (0.059/z) log([Ox]/[Red]) at 298 K
- Use the electron number z in the denominator
- Apply the equation to metal-ion and same-element oxidation-state couples
Use the Nernst form supplied in the syllabus
At 298 K, for Ox + ze⁻ ⇌ Red, E = E° + (0.059/z) log([Ox]/[Red]) in volts, using base-10 logarithms and concentrations in the ratio.
For Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s), z=2 and the pure solid is omitted, so E = E° + (0.059/2)log[Cu²⁺]. For Fe³⁺ + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺, z=1 and E = E° + 0.059log([Fe³⁺]/[Fe²⁺]).
Check ratio, logarithm and units
Use the ratio oxidised form over reduced form as written for the reduction half-equation. A ratio below one gives a negative logarithm; a ratio above one gives a positive contribution.
The factor 0.059 is for 298 K in this syllabus form. Use the equation and conditions given by the question; do not use it unchanged at another temperature.
Pause and explain
For Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻ ⇌ Cu(s), which species is omitted from the concentration ratio?
Worked example
For Cu²⁺/Cu, E°=+0.34 V and [Cu²⁺]=0.010 mol dm⁻³. Calculate E at 298 K.
Show the worked solution
- Use z=2 and omit pure Cu(s).
- E = 0.34 +(0.059/2)log(0.010).
- log(0.010)=−2.
Answer E = 0.34 + 0.0295(−2) = +0.281 V.
Try a topic test
Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.
Test this topic →From guided practice to a new situation
Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.
For Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺, E°=+0.77 V, [Fe³⁺]=0.10 mol dm⁻³ and [Fe²⁺]=0.010 mol dm⁻³. Calculate E at 298 K.
Give me a hint
Use z=1 and the ratio [Fe³⁺]/[Fe²⁺].
Compare my reasoning
- The ratio is 10.
- E = 0.77 + 0.059 log(10).
- log(10)=1.
E = +0.829 V.
Look for these in your work
- Ratio correct
- Electron number applied
- Potential and unit correct
For Cu²⁺/Cu, E°=+0.34 V and [Cu²⁺]=1.0×10⁻⁴ mol dm⁻³. Calculate E at 298 K.
Give me a hint
Use z=2 and log(10⁻⁴)=−4.
Compare my reasoning
- E = 0.34 +(0.059/2)log(10⁻⁴).
- The logarithm is −4.
- Calculate the signed correction.
E = 0.34 + 0.0295(−4) = +0.222 V.
Look for these in your work
- Correct ratio
- Log value correct
- Signed result correct
A student calculates Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ potential using log([Fe²⁺]/[Fe³⁺]). Explain the reversal and state the correct ratio for the reduction equation.
Give me a hint
Write the half-equation as reduction and identify Ox and Red.
Compare my reasoning
- Fe³⁺ is oxidised form in Fe³⁺ + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺.
- Fe²⁺ is reduced form.
- Use [Fe³⁺]/[Fe²⁺].
The ratio was reversed. For the reduction half-equation Fe³⁺ + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺, use [Fe³⁺]/[Fe²⁺].
Look for these in your work
- Ox/Red identified
- Ratio corrected
- Reduction form linked
Common mistakes
- Using z=1 for Cu²⁺/Cu
- Putting reduced/oxidised in the logarithm
- Including a pure solid in the concentration ratio
- Using natural logarithm or the 298 K factor at another temperature
What can you explain now?
For Fe³⁺ + e⁻ ⇌ Fe²⁺, what is z in the Nernst equation?
Compare with the explanation
1
One electron appears in the half-equation.
After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.
Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.
Make it stick
How do the reduction equation, electron number and oxidised-to-reduced ratio determine a Nernst calculation?
If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.