Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9701

Compare ligand exchange colours in copper(II) and cobalt(II)

Use the syllabus examples to explain how changing ligands changes d-orbital splitting and observed complex colour.

Chemistry of transition elements · Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701 · 28.3 / 28.2

A Level; Cambridge International Chemistry 9701, 2028–2030 syllabus, Topic 28. Use the first-row transition elements titanium to copper and the species explicitly named in the syllabus. Where redox potentials or stability constants are needed, use the values supplied in the question. Colour descriptions can depend on conditions and concentration. Written practice is self-checked

Before you begin

  • Use electron configurations, oxidation numbers, ionic equations, equilibrium expressions and the AS redox and bonding models.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Why can Cu²⁺ complexes with different ligands have different colours?

What you will learn

  • Use Cu²⁺ aqua/ammine/chloro examples to connect ligand exchange and colour
  • Use Co²⁺ aqua/chloro examples to connect ligand exchange and colour
  • Explain that colour differences reflect changed ligand fields rather than necessarily a redox change

Copper(II) changes colour when its ligand set changes

The pale-blue Cu²⁺ aqua complex and the deep-blue ammine complex have different ligands around Cu²⁺. In chloride-rich solution, a chloro complex can also form. These observations illustrate ligand exchange and different d-orbital energy gaps.

The ligand change can alter ΔE, which changes the frequency absorbed and the complementary colour seen. Keep the copper oxidation state at +2 unless a redox equation gives evidence otherwise.

Cobalt(II) aqua/chloro exchange changes the observed colour

Pink [Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺ and blue [CoCl₄]²⁻ illustrate the effect of replacing water ligands with chloride ligands. Their geometries and ligand fields differ, so the splitting and absorbed light differ.

A colour change supports a change in coordination environment; it does not by itself prove a change in oxidation state. For a mixture at equilibrium, observed colour can be intermediate and depends on composition.

Pause and explain

What remains the same in the pink-aqua to blue-chloro cobalt(II) ligand exchange?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Explain why pink cobalt(II) aqua solution can become blue in excess chloride without invoking redox.

Show the worked solution
  1. Write the aqua/chloro ligand exchange.
  2. The cobalt remains +2 on both sides.
  3. Different ligands give a different splitting and absorbed frequency.

Answer Chloride replaces water to form [CoCl₄]²⁻ from [Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺. Co remains +2; the ligand environment changes ΔE and the absorbed frequency, giving a different complementary colour.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Identify the ligand and colour change in the Cu²⁺ aqua-to-excess-ammonia example.

Give me a hint

Name the starting and final ligand environments.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Starting species is pale-blue [Cu(H₂O)₆]²⁺.
  2. Excess NH₃ forms the deep-blue ammine complex.
  3. Cu remains +2.

Water ligands are partly replaced by NH₃ to form deep-blue [Cu(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]²⁺ from the pale-blue aqua complex; copper remains Cu(II).

Look for these in your work

  • Starting complex identified
  • Final ligand set identified
  • Oxidation state retained
2 · Independent

Compare pink [Co(H₂O)₆]²⁺ and blue [CoCl₄]²⁻ in terms of what is replaced and why colour differs.

Give me a hint

Use ligand exchange followed by ligand-field absorption.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Cl⁻ replaces coordinated water.
  2. The coordination environment and splitting change.
  3. The absorbed and complementary observed colours can change.

Chloride replaces water around Co(II). The ligand field changes ΔE and the frequency absorbed, so a different complementary colour is observed.

Look for these in your work

  • Ligand substitution stated
  • Energy splitting linked
  • Colour mechanism stated
3 · Transfer

A student reports that the colour change proves Cu²⁺ became Cu⁺. What additional evidence would be needed to make a redox claim?

Give me a hint

Distinguish a change in ligands from transfer of electrons.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Ligand exchange alone changes the coordination environment.
  2. A redox claim needs oxidation-state/electron-transfer evidence.
  3. The colour observation alone is not sufficient.

A colour change alone is not proof of reduction. The complexes can have different colours because their ligand fields differ while Cu remains +2; a redox claim needs an equation or other evidence of electron transfer and a changed oxidation state.

Look for these in your work

  • Coordination explanation considered
  • Electron transfer required
  • Colour evidence qualified

Common mistakes

  • Attributing every colour change to oxidation-state change
  • Describing absorbed light rather than observed colour
  • Ignoring geometry when comparing complexes
  • Assuming a mixture has the exact colour of one pure complex
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Why can Cu²⁺ complexes with different ligands have different colours?

Compare with the explanation

Different ligand fields change ΔE and the light absorbed

The observed colour follows the complementary transmitted/reflected light.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How do the Cu(II) and Co(II) examples connect ligand exchange, ΔE and observed colour?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Chemistry

Course scope and assessment

Four hundred and forty-two original lessons map the published learning outcomes across AS Chemistry Topics 1–22 and A Level Topics 23–37, with guided, independent and transfer practice and explained answers. Every numbered subject-content topic and listed outcome tag now has a mapped lesson sequence. Topic 32 maps all 12 hydroxy-compound outcome tags in 11 lessons; Topic 33 maps all 15 carboxylic-acid and derivative outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 34 maps all 22 nitrogen-compound outcome tags in 20 lessons; Topic 35 maps all 12 polymerisation outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 36 maps all four organic-synthesis outcome tags in 14 lessons; Topic 37 maps all 22 chromatography and NMR outcome tags in 18 lessons. Cambridge's 2028–2030 Version 1 syllabus states that there are no significant changes which affect teaching from the preceding edition; the routes are aligned to that edition. This is 37 of the 37 numbered subject-content topics. Full cumulative exam assessment, Paper 3 laboratory competence, Paper 5 investigation practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding. Written practice is self-checked and does not certify exam readiness.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.