Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9701

Predict feasibility from Gibbs energy and temperature

Use the sign of Gibbs energy to assess feasibility under stated conditions and predict how temperature changes the result.

Chemical energetics · Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701 · 23.4

A Level; Cambridge International Chemistry 9701, 2028–2030 syllabus, Topic 23. Use the syllabus sign convention for lattice enthalpy (gaseous ions forming the ionic solid); state phases, signs, units and temperature. Written practice is self-checked

Before you begin

  • Use AS enthalpy changes and Hess's law, formulae for ions, balanced equations, and temperature in kelvins.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

What does ΔG < 0 indicate for the forward reaction under the stated conditions?

What you will learn

  • Use the sign of ΔG to assess feasibility under stated conditions
  • Predict temperature effects from the signs of ΔH and ΔS
  • Distinguish feasibility from reaction rate and observed completion

The sign of ΔG indicates feasibility, not speed

For the conditions considered, ΔG < 0 indicates a feasible change, ΔG > 0 indicates it is not feasible in the forward direction, and ΔG = 0 indicates equilibrium. This thermodynamic test does not predict how fast the reaction occurs.

A feasible reaction may be slow, and a reaction can appear incomplete because it reaches equilibrium. Do not use ΔG alone to claim a reaction is rapid, quantitative or safe.

Combine enthalpy and entropy signs to predict temperature effects

If ΔH < 0 and ΔS > 0, both terms favour feasibility at all temperatures. If ΔH > 0 and ΔS < 0, neither favours it. If ΔH < 0 and ΔS < 0, lower temperature favours feasibility; if ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0, higher temperature favours feasibility.

These patterns follow ΔG = ΔH − TΔS. At a temperature where ΔG = 0, the system is at the boundary; use consistent units if calculating that temperature.

Pause and explain

When ΔH > 0 and ΔS > 0, which temperature direction can favour feasibility?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

A reaction has ΔH° = +40 kJ mol⁻¹ and ΔS° = +100 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. Is it feasible at 298 K and at 500 K?

Show the worked solution
  1. Convert ΔS° to +0.100 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.
  2. At 298 K, ΔG° = 40−29.8=+10.2.
  3. At 500 K, ΔG° = 40−50=−10.

Answer It is not feasible in the forward direction at 298 K (ΔG° = +10.2 kJ mol⁻¹) but is feasible at 500 K (ΔG° = −10 kJ mol⁻¹), under standard conditions.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

A reaction has ΔH° = −55 kJ mol⁻¹ and ΔS° = −120 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. Predict whether lower or higher temperature favours feasibility.

Give me a hint

Use ΔG = ΔH−TΔS and notice the sign of the entropy term.

Compare my reasoning
  1. ΔH is negative and favours the reaction.
  2. ΔS is negative, so −TΔS is positive.
  3. Increasing T makes the unfavourable positive term larger; lower T favours feasibility.

Lower temperature favours feasibility because it reduces the positive −TΔS term while ΔH remains negative.

Look for these in your work

  • Both signs identified
  • TΔS sign interpreted
  • Temperature direction correct
2 · Independent

A reaction has ΔH° = +25 kJ mol⁻¹ and ΔS° = +80 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹. Calculate the crossover temperature at which ΔG° = 0.

Give me a hint

Set ΔH° = TΔS° and convert entropy to kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.

Compare my reasoning
  1. ΔS° = 0.080 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.
  2. T = ΔH°/ΔS° = 25/0.080.
  3. Report kelvins and state the limiting condition.

T = 312.5 K. At this temperature ΔG° = 0; above it, ΔG° becomes negative for these values.

Look for these in your work

  • Equation set to zero
  • Units made consistent
  • Temperature and interpretation correct
3 · Transfer

A learner says a reaction with ΔG° < 0 is guaranteed to finish instantly. Correct the claim.

Give me a hint

Separate thermodynamic direction from reaction rate and equilibrium extent.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Negative ΔG° indicates thermodynamic feasibility under the stated conditions.
  2. It does not give an activation barrier or reaction rate.
  3. A reaction can be slow or establish equilibrium before complete conversion.

ΔG° < 0 indicates that the forward change is thermodynamically feasible under standard conditions. It does not imply an instant reaction or guarantee complete conversion; kinetics and equilibrium matter.

Look for these in your work

  • Feasibility stated
  • Rate distinction made
  • Completion claim limited

Common mistakes

  • Equating feasibility with reaction rate
  • Calling a positive ΔG feasible in the forward direction
  • Ignoring the sign of ΔS when predicting temperature effects
  • Using Celsius in the Gibbs equation
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

What does ΔG < 0 indicate for the forward reaction under the stated conditions?

Compare with the explanation

It is thermodynamically feasible

A negative Gibbs change favours the forward change.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

How does the sign of ΔG establish feasibility, and how do ΔH, ΔS and temperature determine the balance?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Chemistry

Course scope and assessment

Four hundred and forty-two original lessons map the published learning outcomes across AS Chemistry Topics 1–22 and A Level Topics 23–37, with guided, independent and transfer practice and explained answers. Every numbered subject-content topic and listed outcome tag now has a mapped lesson sequence. Topic 32 maps all 12 hydroxy-compound outcome tags in 11 lessons; Topic 33 maps all 15 carboxylic-acid and derivative outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 34 maps all 22 nitrogen-compound outcome tags in 20 lessons; Topic 35 maps all 12 polymerisation outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 36 maps all four organic-synthesis outcome tags in 14 lessons; Topic 37 maps all 22 chromatography and NMR outcome tags in 18 lessons. Cambridge's 2028–2030 Version 1 syllabus states that there are no significant changes which affect teaching from the preceding edition; the routes are aligned to that edition. This is 37 of the 37 numbered subject-content topics. Full cumulative exam assessment, Paper 3 laboratory competence, Paper 5 investigation practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding. Written practice is self-checked and does not certify exam readiness.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.