Learn in your language
Skip to content
A Level · Cambridge (CIE) · 9701

Explain ionic polarisation in Group 2 compounds

Connect cation size to polarising power and to the distortion of a large anion.

Group 2 · Cambridge International AS & A Level Chemistry 9701 · 27.1

A Level; Cambridge International Chemistry 9701, 2028–2030 syllabus, Topic 27. Compare Group 2 ions at the same charge and distinguish lattice formation, lattice dissociation, hydration and solution enthalpy. Trend explanations are qualitative unless data are supplied. Written practice is self-checked

Before you begin

  • Use AS Group 2 reactivity trends, ionic charge and radius, Hess cycles, and balanced equations.

Work on paper. Try each question before revealing help, and explain why your method works.

Quick readiness check

Which factor increases the polarising power of a 2+ ion?

What you will learn

  • Relate cation radius to charge density and polarising power
  • Explain how a cation distorts a large anion
  • Connect anion polarisation to thermal decomposition

A smaller 2+ ion has greater polarising power

Across Group 2, each cation has charge 2+, but the ionic radius increases from Mg²⁺ to Ba²⁺. The smaller Mg²⁺ ion has the greater charge density and attracts the electron cloud of a neighbouring anion more strongly.

Polarising power describes the cation's ability to distort an anion's electron cloud. Keep the comparison controlled: the ions have the same charge, so the changing radius explains the difference.

Distortion weakens the large anion

A large anion such as CO₃²⁻ or NO₃⁻ is more readily polarised than a small anion. A small cation distorts its electron cloud, making the anion less stable and helping it break down when heated.

Down Group 2 the cation becomes larger and its polarising power decreases. The carbonate or nitrate anion is less distorted, so a higher temperature is needed to decompose the compound. This is a qualitative explanation, not a rule that every salt has a single universal decomposition temperature.

Pause and explain

What does a small Group 2 cation do to a large carbonate ion?

Put the idea to work

Worked example

Explain why Mg²⁺ polarises CO₃²⁻ more strongly than Ba²⁺ does.

Show the worked solution
  1. Both cations have charge 2+.
  2. Mg²⁺ has the smaller radius and higher charge density.
  3. Its stronger attraction distorts the carbonate electron cloud more.

Answer Mg²⁺ is smaller than Ba²⁺ but has the same charge, so it has greater charge density and stronger polarising power. It distorts the large CO₃²⁻ ion more strongly.

Try a topic test

Choose Easy, Normal or Difficult. Save your answers and open worked review after finishing.

Test this topic →

From guided practice to a new situation

Write your answer and reasoning first. Use a hint only if you are stuck. The model solution is for self-checking; your written work is not automatically marked.

1 · Guided

Rank Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺ and Ba²⁺ from greatest to least polarising power.

Give me a hint

All have the same charge; compare their ionic radii down the group.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The cation charge remains 2+.
  2. Ionic radius increases from Mg²⁺ to Ba²⁺.
  3. Smaller radius at equal charge means greater charge density.

Mg²⁺ > Ca²⁺ > Ba²⁺ in polarising power.

Look for these in your work

  • Charge held constant
  • Radius trend correct
  • Order correctly inferred
2 · Independent

A learner says Sr²⁺ polarises NO₃⁻ more than Mg²⁺ because strontium has more protons. Correct the reasoning.

Give me a hint

Compare the charge and ionic radius of the cations, not proton number alone.

Compare my reasoning
  1. Both ions carry a 2+ charge.
  2. Sr²⁺ is larger than Mg²⁺.
  3. At the same charge, the smaller Mg²⁺ has greater charge density.

Mg²⁺ has greater polarising power: both ions have charge 2+, but Mg²⁺ is smaller. Proton number alone does not determine the polarising power in this comparison.

Look for these in your work

  • Equal ionic charge stated
  • Ionic size compared
  • Conclusion linked to charge density
3 · Transfer

Two hypothetical 2+ cations have radii 70 pm and 135 pm. Which should distort a large 2− anion more, and what is the limitation of this prediction?

Give me a hint

Use radius to compare charge density, then state that this is a qualitative model.

Compare my reasoning
  1. The smaller ion concentrates the same charge into less space.
  2. Greater charge density gives stronger polarising power.
  3. Do not infer an exact bond type or decomposition temperature from radius alone.

The 70 pm ion should polarise the large anion more strongly because it has the same 2+ charge at smaller radius. This qualitative comparison does not by itself give a numerical decomposition temperature or complete bonding description.

Look for these in your work

  • Same charge recognised
  • Smaller-ion effect explained
  • Prediction limitation stated

Common mistakes

  • Saying the cation charge increases down Group 2
  • Explaining the trend using atomic radius rather than ionic radius
  • Claiming the anion polarises the cation in this comparison
  • Treating polarisation as a change in the formal ionic charge
Recall without your notes

What can you explain now?

Which factor increases the polarising power of a 2+ ion?

Compare with the explanation

A smaller ionic radius

The same charge concentrated into a smaller ion gives greater charge density.

After trying it yourself, choose your next review. This is your self-assessment.

Your review choice appears on Today. Sign in to sync it across devices.

Make it stick

At equal charge, how does ionic radius affect charge density and polarising power?

If you needed the solution, close it and solve the problem again from a blank page. A correct answer is stronger when you can explain the reason for each step.

Keep learning Chemistry

Course scope and assessment

Four hundred and forty-two original lessons map the published learning outcomes across AS Chemistry Topics 1–22 and A Level Topics 23–37, with guided, independent and transfer practice and explained answers. Every numbered subject-content topic and listed outcome tag now has a mapped lesson sequence. Topic 32 maps all 12 hydroxy-compound outcome tags in 11 lessons; Topic 33 maps all 15 carboxylic-acid and derivative outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 34 maps all 22 nitrogen-compound outcome tags in 20 lessons; Topic 35 maps all 12 polymerisation outcome tags in 16 lessons; Topic 36 maps all four organic-synthesis outcome tags in 14 lessons; Topic 37 maps all 22 chromatography and NMR outcome tags in 18 lessons. Cambridge's 2028–2030 Version 1 syllabus states that there are no significant changes which affect teaching from the preceding edition; the routes are aligned to that edition. This is 37 of the 37 numbered subject-content topics. Full cumulative exam assessment, Paper 3 laboratory competence, Paper 5 investigation practice and human subject-teacher review remain outstanding. Written practice is self-checked and does not certify exam readiness.

StudyForA · Learn with understanding

Original teaching content and links to official sources. Check your exam year and qualification before using a resource.